Trending December 2023 # Chatgpt Updated Data Policy: What You Need To Know # Suggested January 2024 # Top 21 Popular

You are reading the article Chatgpt Updated Data Policy: What You Need To Know updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Chatgpt Updated Data Policy: What You Need To Know

OpenAI is a leader in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP). One of its popular offerings is ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot that can converse with humans on various topics. However, this service has been scrutinized recently due to data privacy and security concerns. In March 2023, ChatGPT’s source code bug led to a data breach. Thus, resulting in the leak of some user information. As a result, OpenAI has updated its data policy to address these concerns and reassure its users.

Also Read: Navigating Privacy Concerns: The ChatGPT User Chat Titles Leak Explained

What Has Changed In The Data Policy?

OpenAI’s data policy governs how it uses the data submitted to its API services, including ChatGPT. The company has updated its data privacy and security policy to emphasize data confidentiality and security. It has also clarified how it uses the data submitted by users of its non-API consumer services, which include ChatGPT.

One of the fundamental changes is that Open AI will not use data submitted by customers via its API to train or improve its models unless they are explicitly opt-in to share their data. The API will retain any data sent for abuse and misuse monitoring purposes for 30 days. Users can ensure control over their data and choose how to use it.

For non-API consumer services like ChatGPT, Open AI may use the data users provide to improve its models. However, users can actively turn off training for any conversations created in ChatGPT by accessing the Data Controls settings and switching off the training feature. Users can actively prevent using their data to improve Open AI’s models if they wish to do so.

How Does This Affect Users Of ChatGPT?

If you are a user of ChatGPT, the updated data policy means that your data will be handled with excellent care and security. OpenAI has taken steps to protect user data from unauthorized disclosure or access. It is also providing more transparency about how user data is used. Moreover, users can now control the use of their data.

For example, if you subscribe to ChatGPT Plus, you can rest assured that your payment information is secure and OpenAI will not leak it. OpenAI has acknowledged a previous incident in March 2023 where some payment information of premium users was revealed. Still, the organization has since taken steps to prevent such occurrences.

Also Read: The Dark Side of AI Innovation: ChatGPT Bug Exposes User Payment Data

If you use ChatGPT as a non-paying user, it is essential to be aware that OpenAI may utilize your data to enhance their models unless you actively disable training in the settings. However, OpenAI has clarified that it will not use your data for any other purpose without your explicit consent.

What Are The Risks Of Using Free Translation Services?

While ChatGPT is a powerful tool for natural language processing, it is not the only option for users. Users can use many other free translation services to translate text from one language to another. However, these services come with their risks and challenges.

One of the main risks of using free translation services is that they may not be secure. As we saw with ChatGPT, even reputable companies like OpenAI can experience data breaches that compromise user data. If you provide sensitive information to a free translation service, you should know there is a risk of being leaked or accessed by unauthorized parties.

Also Read: AI Is Stealing Your Data – Say, Experts

Another risk is that free translation services may not be accurate or reliable. These services often rely on machine learning algorithms to translate text, which can result in errors or mistranslations. This can be especially problematic when translating technical or legal documents that require precise language.

Our Say

OpenAI’s updated data policy for ChatGPT is a step in the right direction for data privacy and security. The company has taken steps to protect user data from unauthorized disclosure or access. However, users should still be aware of the risks of using free translation services and take steps to protect their data. By understanding the risks and benefits of these services, users can make better-informed decisions about how to use them.


You're reading Chatgpt Updated Data Policy: What You Need To Know

What You Need To Know About The Telegram Messenger

Telegram Messenger is an instant messaging app that uses phone numbers (or optionally usernames) to connect users. With Telegram, users can send messages, pictures, videos, audios and any other type of file. The instant messenger app category is a hotly contested field, and some of Telegram’s competitors include WhatsApp, Google’s Hangout, BBM, WeChat, Facebook’s Messenger and LINE (among many others).

About Telegram Messenger

Telegram Messenger launched in 2013, created and backed financially by Russian billionaire brothers Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the founders of Russian social networking site VKontakte who wanted to build a communications system that couldn’t be accessed by the Russian security agencies.

It is built on the open source MTProto protocol. Telegram boasts of being fast, reliable and available on (and accessible from) multiple devices at the same time. It also uses a distributed server architecture with multiple data centres spread out in different jurisdictions around the world.

Telegram is available for Android, iPhone, Windows Phone, Linux, Windows, OSX and via the web.


To begin using Telegram, you must register with a phone number. The phone number then becomes the your identity on Telegram. In addition, you can set a username through which other users can connect and chat without having access to the phone number tied to the username. Usernames are optional and can be deleted at anytime by simply saving an empty username.

In addition to text messages, users can send files of any type up to 1.5 GB. Telegram messages also indicate the status of messages sent. One check signifies the message has been delivered to Telegram cloud, and the recipient has been sent a notification, while two checks indicate the recipient has read the message.

Messages sent with Telegram are encrypted by default, between the user device and telegram servers, which guards against man-in-the-middle attacks. In addition, the messages and files are stored encrypted on Telegram servers, while the decryption keys are stored in Data Centres in other jurisdictions. This way, neither Telegram staff nor government agencies with subpoenas can get to user data.

For the truly paranoid, Telegram has Secret Chats which are conversations between users that make use of end-to-end encryption. That is the chat is visible only to the two parties involved in the discussion, and even Telegram servers cannot view the contents of the chat. When a secret chat is set up between two devices, Telegram helpfully generates a picture visualization of the encryption key for the chat, which both users can compare, and if the image matches, then the chat is secure.

For secret chats, a self destruct timer can also be set on messages. This has to be set before the message is sent. The timer begins when the recipient views the message, and when it runs out the message is deleted from both devices. Photos sent with a timer less than one minute can only be viewed while holding a finger on them, and helpfully Telegram notifies the sender if a screenshot is taken.

Users can create groups containing as many as 200 users and can send broadcast messages to as many as 100 contacts. The difference between groups and broadcasts is that in a broadcast message recipients don’t know about each other, while in a group all participants see all other participants.


Obaro Ogbo

Always on the look out for easier methods of solving complex problems, especially using computers. Obsessed with everything software related (languages, operating systems, frameworks, etc).

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Bu Student Government Elections: What You Need To Know

BU Student Government Elections: What You Need to Know

Members of BUnited, this year’s uncontested e-board slate: Shahaf Dan (CAS’22) (from left), vice president of finance; Hessann Farooqi (CAS’22), executive vice president; Aimee Mein (COM’22), vice president, internal affairs; and Nyah Jordan (CGS’20, COM’22), president. Photo by Meghan Cronin (CGS’19, COM’21)

Student Life

BU Student Government Elections: What You Need to Know Voting period for Executive Board and Senate-at-Large runs March 22 through 25

You might have thought election season was behind us, but Boston University Student Government is just now headed to the finish line. After several weeks of hectic campaigning, candidates are making a final push to show voters why they should be elected. 

Students will be able to cast their votes on the Student Link between Monday, March 22, and Thursday, March 25. The results will be announced March 26. 

So, who is on the ballot? The Executive Board, consisting of student body president, executive vice resident, vice president of finance, and vice president, internal affairs, all run together on one slate—this year BUnited is running unopposed. Voters will also get to choose a Senate-at-Large party (these parties represent student interests to the administration) and representatives from their individual colleges. 

Next week, the Student Elections Commission is hosting two virtual town halls. The first, on Monday, March 22, will provide students a chance to ask BUnited e-board candidates questions and learn more about their platform. The second, a virtual Senate Town Hall, is Tuesday, March 23. Students can chat with current and future BU Student Government senators and tell them what issues matter most to them. Find more information about both events in the kicker below.  

Here’s a look at BUnited and this year’s at-large parties, and what a vote for them could mean:

President: Nyah Jordan (CGS’20, COM’22)

Executive Vice President: Hessann Farooqi (CAS’22)

Vice President of Finance: Shahaf Dan (CAS’22)

Vice President, Internal Affairs: Aimee Mein (COM’22)

Platform: The slate’s vision for BU’s future has been shaped by the experiences and hardships they have witnessed over the past pandemic year. BUnited is focusing on three main categories to improve the overall well-being of the student body: health, justice, and community.

Regarding health, their proposed initiatives include a therapy program, more workout/wellness spaces on East Campus, and a communal food pantry available to all members of the BU community.

Addressing justice, BUnited is calling for increased support for LGBTQ+ students, helping students register to vote in US elections by making voter registration part of Orientation, and holding monthly student government town halls.

To find out more about what BUnited wants to do, take a look at the full platform here.

Senate-at-Large race

For the Senate-at-Large race, voters should pick the party that most aligns with their interests. There are a total of 10 seats for at-large parties in the Senate and votes are counted proportionally (if one party gets 40 percent of the votes, it will earn 4 of the 10 open seats.) To decide which party to vote for, below is your cheat sheet with the party names and platform descriptions, in their own words. 

Party Leader: Ricky Nieto (CGS’21)

Platform: We are the group tackling the major concerns of our generation, both on campus and in state and national legislatures. Specifically, we work to protect the environment, make college more affordable, fight hunger and homelessness, and promote civic engagement.

Party Leader: Ana Paola Trujillo (CAS’22)

Platform: Women in Politics wants to discuss ongoing domestic and international political issues and laws that affect the city of Boston and members of the BU community. We want to brainstorm ideas on how to reach out to Massachusetts council members and legislators with issues important to the BU community. As a collective, we want to voice our opinions for more political and pre-law opportunities at BU, such as internships, classes, and guest speakers. We want to be a part of the Senate because women are often underrepresented in these spheres, and we want to be the voice for them.

Party Leader: Hessann Farooqi (CAS’22)

Platform: In just one year, our members have passed bills and resolutions to:

Investigate BU’s response to COVID-19

Bring back Credit/No Credit

Make US elections a BU holiday

Increase transparency in Student Government

And we’re just getting started! Next year, we will:

With tangible accomplishments, you know we’ll unite BU to transform our campus!

The Student Elections Commission is hosting a virtual Executive Board Town Hall on Monday, March 22, where students can pose questions to the candidates for next year’s e-board. Find more information here.  

The commission will also host a virtual Senate Town Hall on Tuesday, March 23, where students can chat with current and future BU Student Government senators. Find more information here. 

Explore Related Topics:

Massachusetts Ballot Questions 2023: What You Need To Know

What Massachusetts Voters Need to Know about 2023 Ballot Questions Here’s a little help in figuring out Tuesday’s three referenda

In addition to a number of competitive state and congressional races, Massachusetts voters will decide three ballot questions on Tuesday, on issues including nursing regulations and transgender rights. Photo courtesy of iStock/razihusin


Question 1: restricting the number of patients assigned to a nurse

Question 2: studying ways to roll back the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision

Question 3: retaining protections for transgender people

But wait just a minute, and another ad pops up with a different group of nurses explaining why they’re against Question 1.

Those bombarded by the commercials won’t be surprised to learn that collectively the two sides have spent more than $27 million in the campaign. Many are left wondering what most nurses really think.

Whether to limit the number of patients assigned to nurses is one of three questions on the Massachusetts ballot this year. Because voting in this year’s midterm elections is seen as a referendum on President Trump, voter turnout is expected to be higher than usual.

Unsure what the ballot questions are about? BU Today has put together a quick rundown on the three questions and who’s on which side.

It’s about quality of care. Or profits. Or both.

Question 1, put forth by the Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA), would limit the number of patients that could be assigned to a single nurse. The actual rules would depend on the type of care the patients require—for example, a maximum of four medical or surgical patients could be assigned per nurse—with fines up to $25,000 a day for hospitals that fail to comply. Currently only intensive care unit staffing is regulated that way.

The MNA, the union representing about a quarter of the commonwealth’s nurses, calls its campaign the Committee to Ensure Safe Patient Care and says the new regulations would protect the public by preventing hospitals from overassigning patients to nurses to keep costs down and protect profits. More of a nurse’s time per patient means better care, they argue. They tout an April phone survey where 84 percent of nurses supported the question.

According to figures available last week from the Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance, the Committee to Ensure Safe Patient Care (the yes side) has raised more than $11 million, while the Coalition to Protect Patient Safety (the no side) has raised more than $25 million.

A WBUR poll conducted last month showed voters about evenly split over the question. A yes vote would mean that the new limits would go into effect on January 1, but anyone who’s seen what it takes to get a regulatory framework set up in Massachusetts—such as implementing the sale of recreational marijuana—knows that it will likely be weeks or months before enforcement begins.

Even a quixotic effort has to start somewhere

The same WBUR poll showed strong voter support for Question 2, which would create a state commission to recommend amendments to the US Constitution that would establish that corporations do not have the same free speech rights as individual citizens and that campaign finance can be regulated. Essentially this is an attempt to roll back the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which opened American political campaigns to a new era of corporate spending and PAC money influence.

Ironically, perhaps, ad spending on this question has been minimal. Supporters of The People Govern Not Money Initiative, which is driving the ballot question, have raised just over $200,000, while their opponents, No on Two for Freedom of Speech, have not reported raising or spending anything. Perhaps both sides know that forming a commission to recommend Constitutional amendments is at best the first step on a long road, and perhaps more symbolic than anything.

A tricky question on gender

The WBUR poll also showed strong support for a yes vote on Question 3, which would retain the state law that protects transgender people from discrimination in public places and allows them to use restrooms and other public accommodations that match their gender identity (rather than the sex on their birth certificate).

Supporting a yes vote is the Freedom for All Massachusetts coalition and its Yes on 3 campaign, which is running an ad featuring a Massachusetts father and his transgender teenage son talking about why the protections matter.

Keep Massachusetts Safe has raised more than $442,000 to convince voters to repeal the law that provides protection to transgender people, while the Freedom for All Massachusetts group has raised substantially more— nearly $5 million—to persuade voters to keep the law in place.

Explore Related Topics:

What Is Intel Optane Memory? Everything You Need To Know

If you’ve been following the latest news from Intel, you’ve probably heard of Optane memory. If you’re confused about what that is and why it matters, you’ve come to the right place. Optane is Intel’s upcoming storage technology that can compete with SSDs at an affordable price. Whenever we think of SSDs, what comes first to our minds is speed. From being able to provide speeds of 500 MB/s on SATA based SSDs, to being able to provide speeds upwards of 2500 MB/s on PCIe based NVMe SSDs, solid state drives have come a long way. These high speed drives are trying to get rid of the good old mechanical hard drives that offer you terabytes of storage space for under a hundred bucks. This is where Intel Optane kicks in and that’s exactly what we’re going to discuss in detail today. So, without further ado, let me first tell you what is Intel Optane Memory:

What Is Intel Optane Memory?

Intel’s Optane Memory technology is an upcoming storage technology that aims at making your mechanical hard drives much faster for an affordable price, using a non-volatile memory technology known as 3D XPoint. With Optane, Intel wants to provide high speed and system responsiveness without compromising the user’s system storage capacity. Their way of doing it is by using a super-fast cache memory to work in conjunction with your traditional mechanical hard drive. So basically, the most recently accessed data is put into a high-speed SSD cache, which includes Windows OS files, game data and much more. This, in turn helps to considerably speed up systems that are still using mechanical hard drives without breaking the bank.

What Is 3D XPoint?

3D XPoint is a non-volatile memory technology that promises to fill the huge gap between DRAM and NAND flash, by offering huge improvements in latency and performance. 3D XPoint was announced by Intel and Micron Technology back in July 2023, although the development started 3 years earlier. Intel claims that 3D XPoint is 1000 times faster than NAND Flash, but take that with a grain of salt. It has been considered as the solution to physical constraints and DRAM cost that have limited data center design for years. The first storage devices to use the 3D XPoint technology are Intel’s own Optane drives. Although not as fast as some of the high-end NVMe SSDs on the market, the Optane based memory is still considered as one of the fastest that is currently in production.

How Does Optane Perform?

The initial Optane drives where announced by Intel earlier this year at the CES in 16GB and 32GB variants, which promised to serve as cache memory and speed up traditional hard drives. Although that’s the case, Intel also has larger capacity SSDs based on Optane Memory in the works, like the Intel Optane SSD DC P4800X Series, which has a capacity of 375GB. Intel has recently shared the benchmarks on the Optane drives with larger capacity and compared them to NAND flash based Intel SSD DC P3700, which is almost 3 years old now. Although benchmarks have indicated that the Optane drives won’t reach the performance levels that Intel has claimed, atleast in real world usage, it shows enough potential and could end up as the storage technology of the future.

Another thing which Optane drives excel in is latency. Today, there’s a significant gap between the latencies of NAND flash and DRAM. Optane bridges the gap between NAND and DRAM, by offering much lower latencies than NAND flash and just 10 times higher latencies than DRAM. This is a huge improvement, considering Optane is non-volatile memory.

Why Does Intel Optane Matter?

One of the biggest reasons why Intel’s Optane memory is a big deal is because it can make our old mechanical hard drives relevant again. By using Optane as a cache memory and the hard drive as primary storage, it can significantly speed up our system and improve the responsiveness multifold at an affordable price. Yes, you don’t necessarily have to spend hundreds of dollars on PCIe based NVMe SSDs anymore. These Optane cache drives are in M.2 form factor and can be easily inserted into the M.2 slot on your computer’s motherboard. On the other hand, the 375GB Optane based solid state drive is fast enough that it can be used as a RAM. Well, If that doesn’t excite you enough, I have no idea what will.

Release Dates and Pricing

As we discussed earlier, the Optane cache memory will be available in 16GB and 32GB variants in an M.2 form factor for a price of $44 and $77 respectively. Now that’s affordable pricing for something that can speed up your good old mechanical hard drive up to 14 times faster. It can also improve the overall speed of your HDD based PC by 28%. These drives are expected to be available starting April 24.

Device Support for Octane

Intel Optane will be supported by almost all the Kaby Lake processors except the Kaby Lake based Pentium and Celeron CPUs. Even higher end Skylake processors are not compatible with Intel Optane memory. Most of the older motherboards aren’t supported either. Motherboard manufacturers like ASUS, MSI and Gigabyte have updated their BIOS on their recent motherboards to provide support for Optane memory technology. You can check out the complete compatibility list right here.

Also, Intel Optane Memory is initially aimed for desktop PC usage and support for Notebook and smartphones is coming at a later stage.

Is Optane The Future of Storage?

Dominating Your Ecommerce Category In 2023: What You Need To Know

First-Touch Personalization: Why It Dominates

When the shopper is new and arriving from a search, we only have one point to personalize around: the search term.

And shoppers expect us – no, need us – to solve the problem as they described it: in the form of that search term.

This “first-touch personalization” is easy to do in a physical shop. I need shampoo, and I have very specific needs. (I’m an oily, wavy hair, salt-and-peppery kind of guy.)

I go to the Body Shop and tell them, “Hey, I’m looking for a good shampoo.” They look at my hair, ask me a couple of questions, take me to the right section, and point to the part of the shelf that most likely contains the shampoo meeting my particular criteria.

So let’s summarize what a shopgoer like you or me wants when we walk in a store:

A store with products in stock that solve our problem.

Knowledgeable staff who can direct us to the section of the store with only those products.

A pleasant buying experience.

This is all simple to achieve in a physical store with real people running it.

But now, shoppers are moving online in droves. Physical retail is dying. Malls are closing. Staff are getting laid off.

So the onerous task of providing that first-touch personalization in the shopping experience falls to landing pages on your website. And they only have one point of data to personalize around – a search term.

What First-Touch Personalization Looks Like for Ecommerce

Here are a couple of examples of the difference between the traditional way ecommerce teams tried to convert shoppers from search – vs. adding first-touch personalization.

The first is for Adore Beauty, an online cosmetics that does about $100 million in revenue per year.

Adding first-touch personalization for Adore Beauty:

Increased shopper conversion rate by 98%.

Reduced customer acquisition cost (CAC) by 64%.

(Here’s the full case study.)

The concepts behind these results are well known, as studies have proven the average conversion rate increase for pages satisfying these two shopper expectations is 108% and CAC reduction is 48%.

The improvements make sense when you look at the before and after customer experience for one customer need, “eyelash serum for growth.”

“Before” first-touch personalization, the landing page has only one product. Shoppers dislike this landing page experience when they’re searching, because they want to see multiple options that solve their problem – then compare, select, and buy.

Regardless of what goes on below the page fold, to a shopper, this page contains only that product. A full 75% of shoppers will never scroll down a page that has only one product above the fold.

But, having more than one product above the fold makes them scroll and stay:

Makes them scroll: 116% more likely to scroll down the page

Makes them stay: 88% more likely to visit more than one page on your site

Here’s the “after” first-touch personalization experience for an Adore Beauty shopper looking for “eyelash serum for growth.” This properly recreates the experience a shopper wants when they walk in the store:

They see many options (7 products) matching their need.

The options are ranked by how well they match the need.

The revenue returns for brands that move to first-touch personalization are extraordinary, too. On average, internal data from our clients shows they increase their average new customer revenue from organic search by 63%.

Take chúng tôi an online retailer that does $500 million a year. Tens of thousands of their new customers started their lifetime of buying on a Longtail UX page, generating:

More than $10 million in revenue from new shoppers per year.

105% year-on-year growth from Longtail UX as a channel.

The “before” first-touch experience for a shopper with a need for a “mini displayport to hdmi female adapter” – only one buying option presented:

The “after,” providing more than 20 buying options varied by type, hertz, voltage, length, color, and more:

(Here’s the full case study.)

The digital transformation looks simple, but there is complex machine learning matching going on behind the scenes.

To find out how much more revenue your ecommerce site would get, how much you can reduce customer acquisition cost, and what categories you can easily take on, run our free Scorecard tool here.

Unprecedented Results for Google Shopping With First-Touch Personalization

Considering Google Shopping Ads is 76% of the average search marketing budget, you would think all ecommerce sites would already be providing multiple options matching a shopper’s needs when they land.

They’re not.

Multiple products on the page.

All matching the customer’s immediate need.

At least 4 products visible above the page fold.

The rest are either showing unrelated products, putting the products below the fold, or showing none at all.

Some notable examples providing the lowest-rated first-touch shopping experience include Walmart and Home Depot, as well as major stores with recent bankruptcies:


Neiman Marcus

The Paper Store

Their landing pages all provide the worst possible experience – costing them double the customer acquisition cost of ecommerce brands that do this right.

Brand GNC Neiman Marcus The Paper Store Customer need vegan protein fjallraven kanken lol surprise pets Number of similar products above the fold 1 1 1

This means 48% of spend on Google Shopping Ads is wasted on most ecommerce sites industry-wide; it’s a huge opportunity for an up-and-coming contender in any category to compete – and win against brands that aren’t getting this right yet.

Some internal results from our own clients confirm that first-touch personalization can make an emerging brand a force to be reckoned with in any category.

Outbax Camping, an emerging brand in the outdoor recreation space, dominates in categories against bigger brands like Decathlon and UGG with first-touch personalization, improving:

Conversion rate: Over 300%.

Average basket value: Over 90%.

Bounce rate: Reduced by 50%.

The digital transformation looks simple, but complex matching algorithms are behind the products offered on the page.

The “before” – one buying option for the customer’s need (“lithium power station”):

The “after” – 5 buying options ordered by relevance to the customer need:

AMF Magnets, an emerging custom magnets vendor, is another example of a growing ecommerce store punching above its weight, beating Zazzle and Vistaprint in experience, and doubling their add to cart rate.

Their shopping experience “before” first-touch personalization, with only buying option to meet the buyer’s need (“red whiteboard clip”):

And “after,” with four buying options ordered by relevance to the customer need:

To find out which categories, and much more market share your brand could be owning, we built a free Scorecard tool you can run here.

Go run it now to see what ecommerce categories you could dominate, the revenue you could generate, and acquisition costs you could save while doing it.

Getting Internal Buy-In on First-Touch Personalization

There’s now no room for doubt – online customers expect personalization from the first touch.

Brands that don’t go all-in on digital transformation will not make it through the 2023s, and CEOs are getting that message.

Recently, 67% of Global 2000 CEOs polled said they put digital transformation at the center of their corporate strategy, and 35% of IT resources are already spent on creating new digital revenue streams.

The data is here – the case is clear.

Now is the time to adopt new tech that can make giant leaps without putting a strain on the internal tech stack – which is why we are now only offering Longtail UX as a fully outsourced bolt-on platform we run for our clients.

Talk to us about how to implement first-touch personalization, increase your online market share, and dramatically reduce your customer acquisition costs.

Update the detailed information about Chatgpt Updated Data Policy: What You Need To Know on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!