Trending March 2024 # Dell Xps 17 Review: A Masterful Windows Workhorse # Suggested April 2024 # Top 4 Popular

You are reading the article Dell Xps 17 Review: A Masterful Windows Workhorse updated in March 2024 on the website Moimoishop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Dell Xps 17 Review: A Masterful Windows Workhorse

Pros

Solid performance for the price

Massive, bright, colorful display 

Offers four Thunderbolt 4 ports 

Long battery life

Cons

Heavy and thick 

Mediocre keyboard

Lacks USB-A, HDMI, or Ethernet

RTX 3060 is the quickest available GPU

Our Verdict

Dell’s XPS 17 is a well-rounded workhorse that delivers battery life, build quality, and performance in equal measure.

Are you looking for a laptop that can do it all? Whether you’re at your desk or traveling across the country? The Dell XPS 17 might be your next laptop. This massive laptop is a versatile machine that’s enjoyable to use day-to-day and packs strong overall performance. The display is also beautiful and battery life is impressive. While the keyboard is nothing to write home about, we feel the pros far outweigh the cons. Read on to learn more.

Dell XPS 17 9720 (2024) specs and features

The base Dell XPS 17 has an Intel Core i5-12500H processor with integrated graphics, 8GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, and a 1920×1200 display. My review sample packs multiple upgrades, however, including an Intel Core i7-12700H processor, Nvidia RTX 3060 mobile graphics, and a 4K touchscreen.

CPU: Intel Core i7-12700H

Memory: 32GB

Graphics/GPU: Nvidia RTX 3060

Display: 3,840 x 2,400 IPS Touchscreen

Storage: 1TB SSD

Webcam: 720p with IR camera, dual-array microphone

Connectivity: 4x Thunderbolt 4 with DisplayPort Alt Mode and Power Delivery, 1x SDcard reader, 1x 3.5mm combo audio jack

Networking: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2

Biometrics: Fingerprint reader, IR camera

Battery capacity: 97 watt-hours

Dimensions: 14.74 x 9.76 x .77 inches

Weight: 5.34

MSRP: $1,649 base, $2,799 as tested

Dell’s upgrade pricing is tame, as my review sample’s substantially quicker hardware adds $1,000 to the price. A $2,799 laptop is hardly affordable, of course, but Dell’s overall pricing feels competitive in the segment. A similarly equipped MacBook Pro 16 starts at $3,099, while a similar Razer Blade 17 retails for the same $2,799 (but has half as much RAM). 

Design and build quality

IDG / Matthew Smith

This is a 17-inch laptop with a 16:10 display. It’s a truly massive piece of glass that dominates the entire experience. Dell uses slim bezels to keep the laptop as small as possible given the display offered, and this effort is successful. The XPS 17 is more compact than the LG Gram 17 (though LG’s laptop is lighter), Razer Blade 17, or HP Envy 17.

There’s an old-school feel to the Dell XPS 17. Most of this is the laptop’s sheer size – at nearly 15 inches wide and 10 inches deep, this beast is noticeably larger than laptops I’d normally consider large, such as the HP Spectre 16, Dell XPS 15 and MacBook Pro 16, feel significantly smaller than the XPS 17.

The XPS 17’s size is easy to overlook when the laptop is closed on a table. Dell’s XPS 13, 15, and 17 all share the same general portions and use similar materials, so they look similar at a distance. This helps the XPS 17 strike a slim, modern pose despite its size. 

Build quality is excellent, as well. There’s surprisingly little flex to be found in the display lid, chassis, and keyboard deck. This rigidity could make the XPS 17 a nice improvised weapon in the event of a zombie apocalypse. 

Keyboard and touchpad

IDG / Matthew Smith

There’s a more functional benefit to XPS 17’s size: it has gobs of interior space. The laptop’s huge palmrest provides ample space in all directions. Most owners will have no trouble finding a comfortable typing position.

Dell leans into this with a center-aligned keyboard that lacks a numpad. Choosing to ditch the numpad, which is common on many 17-inch laptops, keeps the keyboard centered on the laptop’s surface and above the touchpad. It’s an extremely comfortable layout. 

The keyboard itself is less impressive. Key feel is shallow and ends with a vague, spongy bottoming action. This is countered by quality keycap materials and smooth key travel. It averages out to a passable experience that falls behind alternatives like the LG Gram 16 and MacBook Pro 16. Even the Acer Swift 3 16-inch, a much less expensive laptop, is a bit more pleasant. 

Touchpad quality, on the other hand, is top notch. The touchpad surface is massive, measuring six inches wide and almost four inches deep, by far the largest touchpad I’ve used on a Windows machine this year. It feels responsive and offers plenty of space for using WIndows’ multi-touch gestures. My palms often land on the edges of the touchpad, due to its size, but unintended inputs aren’t an issue. 

Display, audio

IDG / Matthew Smith

The base Dell XPS 17 has a 17-inch 1,920 x 1,200 IPS non-touch display, but my review sample was upgraded to the 3,840 x 2,400 IPS touchscreen. It can’t quite match Apple’s Liquid Retina XDR, or OLED, but certainly has strengths. 

Maximum brightness is extremely high at up to 550 nits, higher than the 500 nits promised by Dell. This is so high that outdoor use becomes possible despite the display’s extremely glossy coat. High brightness comes with elevated black levels, however, so movies and streaming shows can look washed-out in dark scenes.

Color performance is superb. I measured 100 percent coverage of the sRGB and Adobe RGB color gamuts, as well as 98 percent of DCI-P3. Put simply, the XPS 17 can display a wide range of color – as wide as you’ll find on any laptop sold today. Color accuracy is outstanding, as well, so content looks as its creator intended. 

Sharpness is truly top-tier. A resolution of 3,840 x 2,400 on a 17-inch display translates to 266 pixels per inch, which is as good as it gets on a laptop of this size. The extreme pixel density provides clarity in 3D games, wonderful clarity in 4K streaming content, and crisp edges around fine text. 

Gamers should note the XPS 17 lacks Nvidia G-Sync and the display has a maximum refresh rate of 60Hz. These sacrifices are made to enable switchable graphics, a decision that improves battery life. 

While the XPS 17’s display is excellent, its speakers fall short. Maximum volume is high but the audio has a harsh, sparkling quality that’s unpleasant when the volume is turned up. Dialogue comes through clearly, as do quick bass beats, but complex tracks can sound muddled. Still, the speakers are acceptable for video calls and podcasts. 

Webcam, microphone, biometrics

Work-from-home professionals will be disappointed by the Dell XPS 17’s webcam. It’s a basic 720p camera that offers merely passable video quality and struggles with low-light situations. It’s fine for most video calls but won’t pass muster if you’re hoping to impress in a virtual meeting or call in for an interview. 

The same can be said of the dual-microphone array. Most modern dual-mic arrays are passable, and the XPS 17’s is no exception, it doesn’t stand out. Audio quality is usable but has a distant, hollow quality. 

There’s some good news in biometrics, at least. The XPS 17 has a fingerprint reader built into the keyboard and supports Windows Hello facial recognition login through the IR camera. Both features are standard and work well, though I find facial recognition quicker and more reliable than a fingerprint reader. 

Connectivity

IDG / Matthew Smith

The Dell XPS 17 embraces Thunderbolt 4 in a big, warm, fuzzy bear hug. We’re talking four Thunderbolt 4 ports, all of which support DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery. All four Thunderbolt 4 are also compatible with USB4. This impressive selection means you can charge the laptop using any available port and attach multiple DisplayPort monitors.

A quick word of warning, however: the Dell XPS 17 configuration I reviewed can consume over 100 watts at load, which is more than the maximum wattage of most chargers and peripherals that can provide power over Thunderbolt 4 or USB4. Owners will want to use the charger that comes with the laptop. 

While the XPS 17 is friendly with Thunderbolt 4, it gives other ports the cold shoulder. There’s no USB Type-A, no HDMI, no standard DisplayPort, and no Ethernet. You’ll need to pack an adapter to use these connections. A 3.5mm combo audio jack is present, however. 

There is one uncommon connectivity option available: a full-sized SDcard reader. Photographers and videographers will appreciate its inclusion.

Wireless connectivity includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. It’s a small disappointment to see Wi-Fi 6E, the latest wireless standard, is unsupported. A Dell representative says this is due to the antenna design. Despite this, I measured wireless speeds equivalent to Gigabit Ethernet over short distances – fast enough that I didn’t miss the physical Ethernet port.

Performance

The Dell XPS 17 I tested had an Intel Core i7-12700H processor with a total of fourteen cores: six performance cores and eight efficient cores. This was paired with 32GB of RAM and a 1TB PCIe NVMe solid state drive. 

IDG / Matthew Smith

I’ll lead with PCMark 10, a full system benchmark that leans heavily on processor performance. It reaches a score of 7,134 on the Dell XPS 17, which is behind the other laptops in this competitive set. The difference is slim, however, and perhaps to be expected given the XPS 17 is a tad smaller than most 17-inch laptops. 

IDG / Matthew Smith

Cinebench R20 provides a stronger result for the Dell XPS 17. It eeks in a minor victory over the Gigabyte Aorus 17 and Razer Blade 17. The Ryzen-powered Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 falls noticeably behind in this test though, to be fair, that could be due to its small size (we’ve yet to test Ryzen 6900HS in a 17-inch laptop). 

IDG / Matthew Smith

The Dell XPS 17 once again falls slightly behind the pack in the Handbrake video encode test. This is a lengthy test, requiring more than 13 minutes on even the quickest machine, so it highlights differences in thermal performance. It’s clear the XPS 17 struggles to maintain processor performance over time, at least when compared to other 17-inch powerhouses. 

IDG / Matthew Smith

Shadow of the Tomb Raider once again shows the XPS 17 behind – although, in practical terms, this is not a bad result. The XPS 17 maintains a framerate well above 60 FPS in this game despite its less powerful GPU. 

IDG / Matthew Smith

The much more demanding Metro Exodus benchmark puts the Dell XPS 17 just shy of 30 frames per second. This once again shows the limits of an RTX 3060, but I think it’s a fine result for the XPS 17. The laptop is capable of solid 30 FPS gameplay at the more reasonable Ultra performance setting.

Shoppers should remember the XPS 17’s less capable graphics hardware comes with a lower price tag. A Razer Blade 17 or Gigabyte Aorus 17 can beat the XPS 17 when configured with faster hardware, but the Razer Blade 17 we reviewed had an as-tested price of $3,999 while the Gigabyte Aorus 17 was tested at $3,299. You pay for what you get. 

Dell’s XPS 17 delivers respectable performance across the board. The question shoppers should ask is this: is the XPS 17 – and its graphics specifically – quick enough for me? The answer, for most people, will be “yes.” However, gamers and professionals who use apps with GPU compute support should look to alternatives that offer faster graphics hardware. 

Battery life

The Dell XPS 17’s size makes it a difficult travel companion. It will fit in most bags designed to accommodate a 15-inch laptop, but not all, and the laptop’s five-pound weight is not easy to ignore. 

A portion of that weight is due to the gigantic 97 watt-hour battery. This is close to the 99 watt-hour size limit imposed by FAA regulations for devices passengers can bring on flights (anything larger is prohibited). 

Dell uses switchable graphics to turn off the Nvidia graphics hardware (if equipped) when it’s not required. The integrated Intel graphics hardware is used instead. This provides surprisingly good battery life in basic day-to-day tasks. 

IDG / Matthew Smith

The Dell XPS 17 lasts longer than some smaller laptops that configure more power-hungry features, such as an OLED display, and easily blows past any alternative that has discrete graphics but lacks switchable graphics. 

There is a catch. This benchmark did not engage the Nvidia discrete graphics hardware and is standardized to a brightness level of 200 nits. Firing up a 3D rendering application or 3D game will drastically slash battery life. 

Still, the XPS 17’s battery life is a best-case scenario for a large Windows laptop. The laptop can handle a packed eight-hour day of writing, editing, and video calls. 

Conclusion

There’s one word that best describes the Dell XPS 17: balanced. 

Dell’s well-rounded workhorse doesn’t set records in any particular area but delivers solid results across the board. It offers forward-looking connectivity, a massive screen, strong CPU and GPU performance, and good battery life. And it does all this at a reasonable price. This makes the Dell XPS 17 a good fit if you want a single do-it-all machine and don’t mind lugging around a large backpack when you travel. The XPS 17 can handle any task you’ll throw at it, at home or on the go. 

You're reading Dell Xps 17 Review: A Masterful Windows Workhorse

Dell Xps 17 9700 (2024) Review: Large, Impressive & Expensive

The Dell XPS range has been one of the most prominent and impressive laptop brands over the last decade and the Dell XPS 17 9700 is a big-screen machine that’s aiming to continue that tradition.

A true desktop replacement? Let’s find out.

Design & Build

The XPS 17 doesn’t break the mould, but that’s not a bad thing: the carbon-fibre coating and a shining aluminium body make for a modern laptop classic. And the XPS has diamond-cut edges, a sleek tempered shape and no extraneous silliness.

Build quality remains great and the display’s tiny bezels mean the laptop is just 248mm wide. That’s impressive for a 17.3in – the Dell is barely wider than the Apple MacBook Pro 16 and narrower than the Gigabyte Aero 15. When desktop space is hard to find, that’s welcome.

In some areas, the Dell is more ordinary. This machine looks better than the blocky Gigabyte, but it’s not as sleek as the MacBook. It also weighs 2.5kg, which makes it heavier than both competitors. If you need a light 17in laptop, consider the LG gram 17 which is just 1.35kg.

Positively, it’s got four USB-C/Thunderbolt ports, an SD card reader, Wi-Fi 6 (11.ax), a Windows Hello-enabled webcam and a power button that doubles as a fingerprint reader.

Negatively, though, there are no full-size USB ports and no HDMI output – Dell includes an adapter, but you may end up needing a proper USB-C adapter. There’s no privacy shutter on the webcam and no wired internet, as per usual.

The MacBook Pro is similar, with four Thunderbolt ports, fingerprint sensing and Wi-Fi 6 but little else. In many ways, the Aero exceeds both thanks to a better port selection, 2.5Gbps Ethernet and Wi-Fi 6.

Keyboard & Trackpad

The XPS 17 uses the same keyboard as the XPS 15 – and that’s a double-edged sword. The Dell strikes a brilliant balance, with buttons that are comfortable, consistent and with welcome softness alongside pleasing speed and crispness.

It’s an excellent typing experience, and you’ll only want to look elsewhere if you want a firmer, crisper action or more travel than these 1.3mm keys offer.

The downside is the layout – there’s no numberpad and smaller cursor keys. The area on either side of the keyboard is devoted to speakers, but on a laptop of this size there’s no excuse to not have both.

The trackpad is large and accurate, and its two in-built buttons are good enough for everyday use – but they’re too soft and push down too far when compared to USB mice.

Screen & Speakers

The display looks fantastic – those tiny bezels really emphasise the 17.3in touch panel, and this screen uses a 16:10 aspect ratio that compares well to the 16:9 ratios typically used elsewhere, with a revised resolution of 3840 x 2400 delivering extra vertical space for creative work.

The peak brightness level of 531 nits is huge and the black point of 0.26 nits is low. Both combine for a contrast ratio of 2,042:1, which is a fantastic result for any IPS display. Those figures mean the Dell serves up incredible vibrancy and depth, lashings of nuance and enough brightness to work indoors or outside.

The average Delta E of 1.82 and the colour temperature of 6,469K are top-notch, and the panel renders beyond 99% of the sRGB and Adobe RGB colour gamuts with volumes that easily get beyond 100%. It also displays an impressive 89.7% of the DCI-P3 gamut.

The XPS 17’s screen is easily good enough for any colour-sensitive photo-editing or design work – and its vibrancy and depth make it look fantastic in day-to-day use.

It’s better than both rival displays, as the Aero and MacBook panels can’t handle the Adobe RGB colour gamut. The speakers are decent, too, with a solid amount of bass and crisp, detailed mid- and high-end sound.

Find out how we test laptops.

Specs & Performance

The components are powerful, but they don’t push the envelope. The Core i7-10875H is an older six-core CPU, and the RTX 2060 Max-Q is fast enough for photo-editing and 1080p gaming – but it uses Nvidia’s older architecture, and it has a cut-back clock speed.

It is, at least, an Nvidia Studio machine, so its drivers are optimised for creative applications.

The specification is completed by 16GB of dual-channel memory and a 1TB SSD that delivers decent read and write speeds of 3,272MB/s and 2,348MB/s.

Despite not having the latest 11th-gen Intel chips, the XPS 17 is quick: a PC Mark 10 score of 5,672 and Geekbench single- and multi-core results of 1,293 and 7,661 see to that.

The XPS is a good thermal performer, too, unlike the XPS 13 9300. The exterior stayed cool and the Dell’s remained relatively quiet during tough work benchmarks – it’s quite a discreet machine. In Cinebench R23’s throttling benchmark the Dell scored 8,554, which is a decent result and far better than the Gigabyte, which indicates that the CPU didn’t suffer from serious throttling issues.

Compared to plenty of other machines, though, the Dell is not particularly fast. The Apple MacBook Pro currently uses older Core i7 and Core i9 chips that offer comparable speed to the Dell, but later this year it’ll be updated to Apple’s new M1 processor, and that chip scores around 1,700 and 7,500 points in Geekbench.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo springs to mind.

It’s easy to find more graphical power, too. The RTX 2060 Max-Q scored 28,778 points in the low-end 3D Mark Sky Diver benchmark and 5,729 in the tougher Time Spy test, but the RTX 3070 inside

In our battery life test where we loop an HD video at 120 nits brightness, the XPS 17 lasted for eleven and a half hours, which is decent – two hours longer than both rival machines.

With a light work test running it lasted for nine hours and 44 minutes, which is another top result. During a tougher work benchmark, though, the XPS lasted for just shy of three hours, and engaging the GPU and CPU in intensive work will reduce that timespan to two hours.

It’s a good result – if you’re careful you’ll get the XPS 17 through a whole workday without plugging in. But you’ll have to hit the mains if you want to push this laptop to its limits for extended periods.

Price & Availability 

The model I’ve reviewed costs £2,899/ $2,849, so it’s hardly cheap – the Aero with the same processor and its RTX 3070 graphics costs £2,599, while Apple’s MacBooks are currently both a little cheaper than the Dell, albeit with their older Core i9 CPUs.

Several alternative specifications are available. A version with a Core i5 processor and Intel’s integrated graphics – and just 8GB of memory alongside a Full HD display – costs £1,799/ $1,399.

A model with a Core i7-10750H processor and GTX 1650 Ti graphics costs £2,599 with the 4K panel and $1,749 in the US with the Full HD display.

At the other end of the scale, a variant with a Core i9 CPU and the RTX 2060 costs £3,199/ $3,799, with the American version including 64GB of memory.

You can also buy the XPS 17 9700 from Amazon, Currys PC World, John Lewis and Very – although they don’t have the cheapest model.

These alternatives are all expensive even at the base price. If you’re not fussed about fancy design, all of these specifications can be replicated for hundreds of pounds less on other machines.

There are also plenty of alternative options in our best laptop chart.

Verdict

In many ways the Dell XPS 17 is deeply impressive: it looks fantastic, the screen is a big, bold and brilliant option for creative work and its battery outlasts rivals.

In several key departments, though, the XPS 17 is a mixed bag. It’s powerful enough, but plenty of machines offer more grunt, and the stellar design is undermined by a hefty weight.

The keyboard combines great typing with a poor layout, and there are great features alongside notable omissions. It’s also expensive when you consider the components on offer here.

The Dell XPS 17 isn’t for everyone: if you need more power, more features or a lower price, you can satisfy those cravings elsewhere.

There’s also an argument that the Dell is both ageing and expensive. But if you’re willing to shell out, this is a robust, good-looking machine with a top-tier 4K display.

Specs Dell XPS 17 9700 (2024): Specs

Processor: 2.3GHz Intel Core i7-10875H

Graphics: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 8GB

Memory: 16GB DDR4

Screen: 17.3in 3840×2400 touch IPS

Storage: 1TB SSD

Ports: 4 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C/Thunderbolt 3, 1 x SD, 1 x audio

Connectivity: Dual-band 802.11ax WiFi, Bluetooth 5.1

Dimensions: 374 x 248 x 19.5mm (WxDxH)

Weight: 2.5kg

Warranty: 1yr RTB

Dell Xps 15 Vs. Macbook Pro 15: Fight!

Dell’s XPS 15 vs. Apple’s MacBook Pro 15 takes its place the same epic list of rivalries as Batman vs. Joker, Red Sox vs. Yankees, and Sheldon vs. Wil Wheaton. Both laptops are intended as workhorses for professionals on the go. And although there are many competitors out there with similar specs, the XPS 15 and MacBook Pro 15 just can’t let the other have the last word.

Gordon Mah Ung

The XPS 15 and MacBook Pro 15 face off yet again.

Ports

The new MacBook Pro 15 has basically four Thunderbolt 3-enabled USB-C ports and a single analog headphone jack (thank god Apple hasn’t killed it this year). You’d think that with $246 billion in hand, Apple would give you a break and include an HDMI dongle or even a USB-Type A to USB-Type C, but no. #ThanksApple.

Gordon Mah Ung

Dell’s XPS 15 gives you an SD card reader, USB 3.0 Type A and Kensington lock port on the right, as well as a battery meter with five LEDs.

Although Apple Scrooges you on ports, one thing you get for free is performance. The Dell XPS 15’s implementation of Thunderbolt 3 uses two lanes of PCIe Gen 3.0, while all four of Apple’s ports are four-lane implementations, which can hit 40Gbps vs. the 20Gbps of the XPS 15.

The good news for the Dell is that DisplayPort traffic is separate from the Thunderbolt 3 traffic, so you could, in theory, run your monitors and still hit 20Gbps without issue. The bad news is the MacBook Pro 15 does that, too, while giving you up to 40Gbps. Today, few can see use for that speed, but in two years who knows what will be here. So yeah.

As much as I favor Apple’s higher-performance implementation on the MacBook Pro 15, the fact that you can’t use the ports without carrying a small bag of dongles that you have to pay extra for means I’m giving this to the Dell XPS 15, just on general principle.

Gordon Mah Ung

When it comes to ports, this photo comparing the left sides of the Dell XPS 15 (top) and Apple MacBook Pro 15 (bottom) tells you all you need to know.

Keyboard

With the Butterfly design for its MacBook keyboards, Apple has gone from “making the best laptop keyboards in the world!” to “It’s not really that bad.” Or: “You get used to it, eventually.” Some will even say: “I actually like it. No, really. I’m serious.”

Gordon Mah Ung

The MacBook Pro 15’s Butterfly keyboard is controversial at best.

Winner: XPS 15, but I’m not happy about it.

Gordon Mah Ung

The XPS 15’s keyboard is a bit too cramped for my digits, but I’ll take it over the MacBook Pro’s Butterfly keys any day of the week, and three times on Friday.

Trackpad and input

Gordon Mah Ung

The MacBook Pro 15’s trackpad is so big, it could be a tablet. 

The XPS 15’s trackpad (unlike its keyboard) is also highly lauded. The Wall Street Journal, in fact, did nothing in its original review of the XPS 15 but gush over how the XPS 15’s track pad is as good as a MacBook’s. I like it, too. The surface has a little more friction to it, but it’s comfortable to use.

Winner: XPS 15

Gordon Mah Ung

The trackpad on Dell’s XPS 15 is remarkably smooth and responsive.

Size and weight

More so than how thin it is is how heavy it is. In that category, the MacBook Pro has it in spades. We weighed our MacBook Pro unit at 3 pounds, 15.6 ounces. Yeah, just call it 4 pounds. The XPS 15 is a half-pound heavier at four pounds, 8.7 ounces. 

Mind you, these are figures for the main units. Once you add the chargers, it really tilts. The MacBook Pro 15 plus its 87-watt charger (without the extended AC cable) is 4 pounds, 12 ounces. Not bad. The XPS 15 with its brick comes in at 5 pounds, 7.4 ounces. That’s a pretty big weight difference. Once you sling that on your shoulder and walk a mile through an airport, it’ll feel like a 10 pounds’ difference.

It is actually impressive to get to just under four pounds in a quad-core laptop with discrete graphics, but Apple made sacrifices to get there. More performance, in general, means more weight to keep it cooler. For example, the power brick for the Dell is 130 watts, significantly beefier than the 87-watt brick for the MacBook Pro 15.

Winner: MacBook Pro 15

Gordon Mah Ung

The Dell XPS 15 is slightly bigger in size than the MacBook Pro 15, but it’s really the weight that matters.

Price

We’ve heard about the infamous “Apple tax,” but is it just trash-talking or something real? To find out, we picked a few of the configurations (including the laptops you see here) to compare. We also added a couple of other configurations so you can see just what you get for your dollar with either company.

The MacBook Pro 15 you see here is the base model. It costs $2,399 and comes with a quad-core Core i7-6700HQ, a Radeon Pro 450 GPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD. Compare that to the Dell XPS 15 before you. For $350 less, you get a quad-core Core i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050, 16GB of RAM, 512GB SSD, and a 4K touchscreen. 

Winner: XPS 15

IDG

Apple tax? The cheapest MacBook Pro 15 costs as much as the top-end XPS 15.

Upgrades

People have been led to believe that upgrading a laptop is all but dead, because so many components have been soldered down to the motherboard. While you can’t swap the CPU or GPU anymore, it’s not true for all parts. You can, for example, buy the Dell XPS 15 you see here and in two years, open it up and drop in 32GB of RAM and a larger 1TB NVMe PCIe SSD. Not bad.

Gordon Mah Ung

You can’t upgrade the CPU or GPU in the XPS 15, but the RAM, SSD, and Wi-Fi module can be swapped out easily.

Winner: Easily the XPS 15

Performance

To find out which laptop is faster we compared the base $2,399 MacBook Pro 15 with a Core i7-6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 16GB of RAM and 250GB SSD against the $2,050 XPS 15 with a Core i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050, 16GB of RAM, and 512GB SSD.

Cinebench R15 performance

First up is Maxon’s Cinebench R15 test. This free benchmark measures CPU performance and GPU performance when tasked with rendering 3D scenes, using the same engine used in Maxon’s Cinema4D product. We used the latest version of Cinebench on both Mac and PC. 

There’s been much shade thrown at Apple for going with the older 6th-gen Skylake CPU instead of waiting for Intel’s newer 7th-gen Kaby Lake CPU. This first benchmark was to see what these quad-cores could do.

The result: It’s not huge difference unless you count the ability of Kaby Lake to handle HEVC encoding and decoding. You also get higher clocks: The XPS 15’s Core i7-7700HQ CPU has a base clock speed of 2.8GHz and a Turbo Boost of 3.8GHz, while the MacBook Pro 15’s Core i7-6700HQ has a base of 2.6GHz and a Turbo Boost of 3.5GHz (here are the detailed specs of the chips on Intel’s website.)

PCWorld

CineBench R15 backs up all of our other CPU tests: The XPS 15 is about 10 percent faster than the MacBook Pro 15 (and lower in cost, too!).

Clearly, if you have a Skylake-based laptop—whether PC or Mac—you should be in no rush at all to “upgrade” to Kaby Lake for CPU work. However, if Dell, HP, Lenovo, and just about every other PC vendor can take the time to upgrade to the latest CPU the same way any of us would change our underwear daily, Apple should be able to do the same. It’s like giving up performance because they can’t be bothered to update the specs on the website.

PCWorld

Single-threaded tasks put the 7th generation Kaby Lake about 10 percent ahead of the 6th generation Skylake chip Apple used in its newest MacBook Pro 15.

CineBench also features a built-in graphics test that measures a computer’s OpenGL performance. Although the XPS 15 stomps the MacBook Pro 15 by more than 30 percent, I’d have to say this is a lot closer than I expected it to be. I’d attribute this to the OpenGL driver performance on Windows, which is just about dead, vs. Mac OS where OpenGL is still preferred. 

PCWorld

How dismal is the graphics performance disparity between the MacBook Pro 15 and the XPS 15? The fact that the XPS 15 is “only” 35 percent faster in CineBench’s OpenGL test is actually good news for it.

Geekbench Performance

Unlike Cinebench, which uses pure CPU rendering as a test, Geekbench uses many different small algorithms modeled after what it feels are valid measurements of performance. Geekbench says the XPS 15 is about 7 percent faster than the MacBook Pro 15, which is what I’d expect.

PCWorld

Again, the updated Kaby Lake offers about 10 percent more performance than the Skylake CPU it replaces.

PCWorld

In general, the XPS 15 and its Kaby Lake CPU, is roughly 10 percent faster across the board.

Geekbench also lets you measure the peformance of a computer at OpenCL tasks, which is an open language that lets you do traditionally CPU-bound tests on the GPU. Running on the discrete graphics of the Mac and the PC, we can see a dramatic difference. It’s just not even fair.

PCWorld

The XPS 15’s GeForce GTX 1050 pretty much eats the MacBook Pro 15’s Radeon Pro 450 for lunch and then uses a Butterflykey for a toothpick.

PCWorld

If you were to rely on the onboard graphics chip to handle a compute load, the XPS 15’s Kaby Lake graphics core would be about 10 percent faster than the graphics core integrated with the MacBook Pro’s Skylake chip.

Blender Performance

Blender is an open-source popular rendering app used in many indie movies. It’s maintained on both MacOS and Windows, but performance, unlike in Cinebench, can be uneven across OS versions. For example, rendering is generally faster on Windows 7 than Windows 10, and I’ve found previous builds of Blender ran faster on MacOS.

IDG

The open-source Blender 3D program backs up other CPU-focused tests: The XPS 15 is about 10 percent faster.

Blender also supports using the graphics chip to render 3D. For this test, I tasked both laptops with a GPU render on the GPU version of the Peter Pan BMW test. The XPS 15’s GTX 1050 finish quite swiftly. The MacBook Pro 15 was much, much slower—so much slower, in fact, that it’s pretty apparent the GPU rendering on Blender just doesn’t work right. Again, I’d blame Blender first rather than the Apple, but if you have to do GPU renders: Skip the MacBook Pro 15 for the XPS 15.

PCWorld

OK, well, something isn’t right and hasn’t been for some time in Blender for GPU renders. The XPS 15 finishes in a few minutes, while the MacBook Pro 15 finishes in a few hours. Yes, hours.

Gaming Performance

The results were downright ugly.  First up is Tomb Raider running at 16×10 resolution on High. The Mac pushes about 47 fps which is OK until you realize the XPS 15 is buzzing along at 137 fps. My guess is 19×10 on Ultimate is well within reach for the XPS 15. You’re basically gassed out at 16×10 with the MacBook Pro 15, so getting to a higher resolution would mean compromising on even more visual quality settings.

PCWorld

In gaming, it’s nothing but ugly for the MacBook Pro 15 as its low-wattage Radeon Pro 450 struggles to compete with the XPS 15’s GeForce GTX 1050.

The situation is worse for Shadows of Mordor. Mind you, I wasn’t able to run the game at the exact same resolutions, so for High I opted for 1536×864 on the MacBook Pro 15 and 1680×1050 on high on XPS 15. That’s about 1.32 million pixels being rendered on the MacBook Pro 15 vs. 1.76 million pixels on the XPS 15, so the XPS 15 is actually doing about 30 percent more work than the MacBook Pro 15.

One other caveat you should note for both games being tested here: This isn’t a pure test of the GPU or CPU in either system, but also a test of the underlying OS, graphics API, driver, and the game itself.

Yes, I know you can install Windows 10 (not free) on the MacBook Pro and play games that way, but this would mean Windows 10 is superior to MacOS, and I don’t think anyone ever wants to admit that. The Shadows of Mordor performance is simply atrocious. I can run Shadows of Mordor on the XPS 15 at 19×10 on the Ultra setting and still see a very playable 48 fps, while the MacBook Pro 15 has to step down resolution (and game settings) to be even approachable to playing. Just ugly.

Winner: XPS 15

PCWorld

If you looked up ugly in the dictionary it would have a picture of the redesigned MacBook Pro 15 and its Radeon Pro 450 playing Middle-earth: Shadows of Mordor. Because woof.

Battery Life

Laptops are laptops because sometimes you do, indeed, run them on battery. While you’ve heard on the Internets that the MacBook Pro 15 has terrible battery life, the truth is it doesn’t.

What’s more impressive about those results is their relation to battery capacity. The MacBook Pro 15 packs a fairly small 74-watt-hour battery, while Dell has upped the capacity on the XPS 15 to 97 watt-hours for this year’s refresh. 

There are mitigating factors, of course. For the most part, the GPUs are likely not part of the battery life equation, as the video playback of the file is run on the CPU’s graphics chip. Skylake and Kaby Lake probably consume about the same amount of energy doing this simple task.

The Dell XPS 15, does, however have a far denser 3840×2160-pixel screen, versus the MacBook Pro 15’s 2880×1600. In PPI, that’s basically about 226 PPI on the Mac vs 293 PPI on the PC. Lighting up more pixels costs you more power. The XPS 15’s 10-point touchscreen also absorbs some power. Other incidental system power draws, such as the SSD’s, may also come into play here.

Winner: MacBook Pro 15

PCWorld

Conclusion

Major Updates In Windows 11 22H2: A Detailed Review

We are now entering into a new phase of the rollout for Windows 11.

It is Windows 11 version 22H2 and is available to eligible Windows devices as a free update.

It includes many new features and native tools in an improvised way.

But those devices having compatibility issues will not get this update notification unless the issue gets resolved.

Go through this in-depth review of the major updates in Windows 11 22H2.

The latest Windows version allows you to block the user notification for updates during active hours.

The organization’s name appears in the Update notifications when the Windows clients are associated with the Azure Active Directory tenant.

The new Windows version 22H2 provides additional improvements for specially-abled people – Focus Sessions, Voice access, natural voices for the Narrators, and system-wide live captions. For more details, you can check this guide.

Microsoft Pluton is a chip-to-cloud security technology. It is built with Zero Trust principles and provides cryptographic services, secure identity, and secure attestation.

This Pluton technology is a part of the System on Chip (SoC) and Microsoft-authored software.

Microsoft Pluton can be enabled on devices that have Pluton-capable processors running the new 22H2 version of Windows.

Malicious and vulnerable driver blocking gets automatically enabled on devices only –

For Clean Windows installation

When Smart app control is enabled

Compatible Windows 11 22H2 version will have Windows Defender Credential Guard automatically enabled.

Now you get enhanced Phishing protection in the Microsoft Defender SmartScreen.

This will protect the works and schools’ sign-in passwords against phishing.

This new version also offers additional protection for the Local Authority (LSA) process. This helps to protect the user credentials from getting compromised.

Windows’s new version allows you to deploy educational themes for the students to use in their educational institutions.

 These themes change the look and feel of the entire device with accent colors, preset wallpapers, and many other settings.

Sticker is a new feature designed exclusively for students to change the look of the desktop.

Students can choose from a wide range of education-friendly stickers. The stickers remain even if the background is changed.

Windows 11 version 22H2 is the first big OS update released to date.

It aims to provide an improved and modernized user experience.

Check out the new features available with this latest update.

Microsoft is rolling out new features and continuous innovation with Windows 11 version.

Windows 11 version 22H2 supports additional CSPs. This will help to modify & customize the Start Menu layout.

These CSP s will help you disable the Context menu and hide the app list.

Windows 11 22H2 update also introduced new Settings in the Start menu.

Now you can choose three different options –

More Pins: The More Pins section displays a single row of items and allows you to show more pins.

Default: Default section shows three rows of Pin items.

More Recommendations: This section displays two rows of pinned items and more recommended items.

The start menu comes with a new feature called Folders.

Now you can drag & drop an application over another app to create a new folder.

It allows you to add more apps to the newly created folder, rearrange those apps and remove the apps from the folder.

You can rename the folder using the Edit Folder option.

As expected, few more settings are added to the Settings app in Windows version 22H2.

The new Settings app supports managing app that was previously supported by the Control Panel only. So, you can now install, modify and repair Win32 apps.

Changes are made to the System window, and exclusive new features have been added to enhance the user experience.

Now there is no need to open a separate Settings page to calibrate the display.

Moving the cursor and Windows between monitors has been made easier in this new version.

Ease cursor movement between displays under the Multiple Displays Section can do this trick now.

Change Default graphics is the latest option added to the Graphics page.

When you use this feature, it opens a new page with the Optimizations for windowed games feature.

This is designed to unlock gaming features like – Variable Fresh Rate (VRR), and Auto HDR, and improve Latency.

The sound page shows a new warning under the Input option that microphone access is restricted in privacy settings.

In the Notification window, the Focus assist settings is changed to Do not disturb settings.

There is an Automatic option to Turn on do not disturb automatically.

The other settings allow you to set the time to automatically turn on and off the feature.

You can also set priority to the Notifications you want to receive when the Do Not Disturb feature is turned on. It is called Set priority notifications.

Focus

The Focus page also comes with a revamped window where you can start focus assist services and choose Session duration from:

Show the timer in the Clock app

Hide badges on taskbar apps

Hide flashing on taskbar apps

Turn on the Do not disturb option.

In the Power section, the values for Sleep and Screen off is reduced to save more energy.

New features like Power consumption and carbon emissions are added to teach users how choosing efficient power settings can help reduce less energy, reduce the carbon impact and improve battery life.

 A new battery-saver mode is added, like what we get in our cell phones that turn on at 20%.

This extends the battery life, limiting some background activity and notifications.

Storage is now called the Storage pool in Windows version 22H2 with a brand-new icon to resemble the setting.

Features like Storage Spaces, Physical Disks are arranged under the Breakdown section.

The feature of the snap window is almost the same but comes in a new rendition like:

When I snap a window, suggest what I can snap next to it.

Show snap layouts when I hover over a window’s maximize button

Show snap layouts when I drag a window to the top of my screen

When I drag a window, let me snap it without dragging all the way to the screen edge.

The Alt + Tab setting is now renamed as Show Microsoft Edge tabs when snapping or pressing Alt + Tab.

To open the Snap Layout, press ‘Windows + Z’ and you will get a particular number for each snap position. All you need to do is press that particular number and this will snap the window to a preferred position.

In the new version, Microsoft will remember whether you have turned on Wi-Fi or Bluetooth in theAirplane Mode and show your preference the next time.

Now you get an updated Printers & Scanners page.

When a printer or device is selected it gives detailed information, including the manufacturer, model, webpage, connection, MAC address, IP address, along with other related information.

In the Advanced Sharing Settings under Network & Internet section.

This new page ports various settings previously available only in the Control Panel, like Network Discovery, File and Printer Sharing, and Public Folder Sharing options.

The contrast theme color on the Theme page is a bit changed. You will get more distinct links now.

Besides selecting from 15 predefined themes, you can also customize the theme on your own.

Additional keyboard and key size settings are available in the Touch keyboard section.

The Touch keyboard is now introduced as Text Input.

Here you will get a newer version of the theme and Customization settings to the touch keyboard, emoji panel, voice typing and other methods.

The Taskbar allows quick access to the currently used applications.

Taskbar settings is introduced new options to enable or disable Flashing on Taskbar apps and Show recent searches when I hover over the search icon. You will find these two features under the taskbar behaviors.

Taskbar corner icons and Taskbar corner overflow settings have new names now.

They are renamed as System Tray icons and Other system tray icons, respectively.

The Taskbar context menu now shows Task Manager along with Taskbar Settings option.

To make the task easier a new Drag & Drop application is added directly in the Taskbar.

Another newly added feature added to the Taskbar is Taskbar Overflow.

This allows the users to open many applications and use them frequently as per their needs.

The new Taskbar also allows the users to a Bluetooth connection so there is no need to add a Bluetooth device from Settings.

With this new update now mute Microphone with a global shortcut.

 All you need to do is press Windows + Alt + K to mute the microphone instantly.

The Fonts Page has been re-designed, including the drag and drops to install area. It provides a Browse and installs fonts button along with that.

Windows 11 22H2 has a newly designed Task Manager to match the desktop style.

It introduces a hamburger navigation bar and a completely revamped Settings page.

The new command bar on each page allows access to everyday activities.

Besides, you will get a dark theme for the new Task manager.

On opening the context menu of a particular process, you will see a new Efficiency mode feature. Using the Alt + V keyboard shortcut, you can turn the Efficiency Mode on or off.

This will help if an app consumes high resources and you want to limit its resource consumption.

But this feature can only be used for a single process and not the entire group.

In addition to this the Task Manager includes accent color support for the Processes tab heatmap.

But to ensure readability, you will see the default blue color sometimes.

In the new version, the apps page is divided into two sections – Installed apps and Advanced apps settings.

The Installed Apps panel will show you all the installed applications and programs.

At the top right corner of the page, you will get three options to change the view of the app list.

Now the sort-by menu is available from smallest to largest files and allows you to sort by Names ( from both A to Z and Z to A chronologies).

Advanced App Settings is a new part of the Settings window that includes the remaining app settings of Apps & Features other than the Installed Apps settings.

Windows 11 22H2 has introduced the Microsoft 365 subscription information removing the Your Accounts Page’ section.

Every detail regarding your payment information, bills, OneDrive storage usage, and the people with whom you share the account will be displayed.

Family & other people is replaced by the Family section & includes all its settings.

The Other users, previously known as Family & other people, now only include the settings for creating local & Microsoft accounts for Windows 11.

The Time & language section and the Date & time pages now have a live digital clock.

In the new installations, the touch indicator option will be disabled by default on the Mouse pointer and touch section now.

The new gestures make Windows 11 22H2 OS unique and more responsive.

You can swipe up from the Taskbar to open the Start menu. Swiping down dismisses the menu.

Swiping left will open All Apps and swiping left will open Pinned Apps.

To access the Quick Settings Panel, swipe up in the bottom right corner and swipe down with 3 fingers minimize all apps.

Windows Spotlight is the latest feature in the new update. It introduces regular Bing images to personalize your desktop as was available in the Windows Dynamic theme.

Copying the file path has been made accessible in the new Windows 22H2 version.

All you need to do is select the file and press Ctrl + Shift + C. This will copy the file path instead of the folder.

This new Windows update brings good news for avid gamers. It adds a plethora of new features for a better PC gaming experience.

Auto HDR and Dynamic Refresh Rate have been added to the windows games.

So, why wait to grab the new Windows update 22H2? Stable Windows users will surely love the new additions to Windows 11.

Htc One (M8) For Windows Review: A Novel New Take On Windows Phone

Lumia, Lumia, Lumia. Lest you forget that Microsoft’s Windows Phone business is more than a single Nokia product line, HTC has released the One (M8) for Windows. It’s just as much a flagship phone as the Android version of the One (M8), and in some ways it feels even fresher thanks to the fact it runs Windows Phone 8.1, a veritable OS curiosity.

In fact, the HTC One (M8) for Windows might be the best Windows Phone available—but that’s simply because not many Windows Phone devices have been released lately. And let’s not lose perspective: Most people will probably conclude that the Android version of this phone is the better choice.

From a hardware perspective, both versions of the HTC One (M8) are virtually identical: its weight and dimensions (160 grams; 146.36 by 70.6 by 9.35 mm); its display (5.0 inches, 1080×1920 resolution); and its guts (2.3GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 801; 2GB RAM; 32GB of storage plus a microSD slot). You’ll also find the same dual UltraPixel camera on the back, and the 5-megapixel selfie camera on the front. HTC hasn’t forgotten its powerful BoomSound internal speakers, either.

Mike Homnick

Both versions of the One (M8) are nearly identical, save for the operating system each runs.

About the only difference in hardware is that the One (M8) for Windows ships standard with 32GB of internal storage, as opposed to the 16GB and 32GB options that HTC offers for its Android version. The HTC One (M8) for Windows will be sold by Verizon for $100, and by AT&T for an undisclosed price at a later date.

The case for Android

The One (M8) for Windows is definitely a solid WP8.1 device. But it’s the lesser of HTC’s nearly identical phones, if only because Android has a stronger software ecosystem, and appears to be a more efficient OS. Sure, a number of third-party alternatives can compensate for Windows Phone’s lack of productivity apps, but Microsoft’s ecosystem still suffers a serious dearth of entertainment apps. We also compared HTC’s new Windows Phone to the One (M8) Harmon Kardon Edition, and that Android phone just flew, snappily loading apps. It felt much faster than the One (M8) for Windows. And oddly, the Windows Phone version of the One (M8) took far longer to boot.

Mike Homnick

HTC also sells this neat Dot Case for about $27. Tapping on the case wakes up the phone, and beams the time and other info through tiny holes.

Oddly, we found that the Android One (M8) delivered substantially better battery life than its Windows doppleganger, playing a looping video for 6 hours and 46 minutes under full brightness. The Windows Phone version died after 5 hours and 39 minutes—almost a 20 percent difference. Nonetheless, HTC says that the One (M8) for Windows delivers 10 percent more talk time than the Android model.

Between the One (M8) and the Icon

Microsoft’s recent decision to address “affordable segments” has left slim pickings for people looking at high-end Windows Phones. Indeed, if you’re committed to the Windows Phone platform, you really have only two respectable choices: the Verizon-exclusive Lumia Icon and the One (M8). Both phones are solid, quite literally, as Nokia and HTC each chose to use aluminum, rather than plastic, bodies. And in terms of industrial design, the Icon feels more like a no-nonsense work phone, while the HTC One (M8) more adroitly bridges the gap between work and play.

Unfortunately, Microsoft doesn’t allow its hardware partners to redesign its Live Tiles interface in the way that Google allows OEMs to reskin Android. As a result, HTC services like BlinkFeed are just like third-party apps on Windows Phone. Mark Hachman

BlinkFeed somewhat duplicates Cortana, in that Cortana delivers news according to your interests. But BlinkFeed is much more visual.

The phone also includes an app for Sense TV, a well-designed remote control for your set-top box. It’s a nice service for browsing content if your provider is still saddling you with an archaic channel guide. 

Fortunately, the One (M8) for Windows is relatively free of bloatware. I was annoyed that Verizon bundled VZ Navigator, its $5/monthly navigation service, when anyone can download the free (and superior) HERE Maps from the Windows Store. Still, I was mollified a bit when I found I could uninstall VZ Navigator from our review unit.

A contentious camera

The One (M8)’s camera features will likely polarize consumers choosing between HTC’s latest model and Nokia’s Lumia phones. HTC likes to trumpet how its “UltraPixel” camera sensor lets in more light, resulting in better image quality when shooting in dark environments. This rear camera also includes a second lens, enabling a wide range of perspective effects. I also found that the One (M8)’s selfie camera has a competitive edge: It captures 5-megapixel images, offering far better clarity than virtually all other front-facing smartphone cameras, period. Mark Hachman

Refocusing a shot after taking it, or using parallax to “jiggle” it, never gets old in the HTC Photo Edit app.

On the flipside, HTC’s rear camera is limited to just 4 megapixels, its light-gathering prowess notwithstanding. Nokia’s Lumia phones, meanwhile, prioritize megapixels; the Icon, for one, captures 16-megapixel images. The upshot is that Nokia fans will likely find it hard to let go of their Lumia cameras, if only because of their increased resolution. The One M8’s camera delivers perfectly serviceable images up close, and delivers evenly lit photos in low light. The shutter lag is about half a second or less, much shorter than the Lumia cameras. But you can still notice a lack of detail in cityscapes, and in zoomed-in images and video.

A vote for novelty

The One (M8) doesn’t do enough to distinguish itself to receive my unconditional recommendation for Windows Phone users. Neither BlinkFeed nor SenseTV justify the purchase, leaving the One M8’s camera technology as the primary reason to buy the phone.

Still, the idealist in me hopes that there’s more to come from HTC’s Windows Phone vision. Microsoft recently loosened its grip on Windows Phone hardware, a policy decision that was instrumental in allowing the HTC One (M8) to come to market. That breath of fresh air makes me yearn for something more. Cloning my existing Windows Phone apps and settings onto new hardware is appealing. But I’d like to see HTC interpret Windows Phone with its Sense aesthetic, too.

HTC’s Sense 6 on Android. Would you like to see this translated to Windows Phone?

The bottom line is that I still see the Lumia Icon as the premiere Windows Phone for work and productivity, while HTC’s selfie camera, BoomSound speakers, and novel dual-camera approach justify a purchase for more creative types.

Dell Launches New Inspiron Laptops, 2

Dell has today launched a bunch of new, redesigned Inspiron laptops in India to cater to the current ‘do-from-anywhere digital lifestyle’ of consumers. These include the Inspiron 14 2-in-1, the Inspiron 13 notebook, and a couple of other laptops. So, before going to the price and availability, let’s take a look at the key specs and features of the new Inspiron series.

Dell Inspiron Series Launched in India Inspiron 14 2-in-1

Starting with the Inspiron 14 2-in-1, it is a hybrid device that comes with a detachable screen to easily turn the laptop into a tablet or vice-versa. It has a touch-supported 14-inch Full HD display with an almost bezel-less design. It can support 4 kinds of modes, namely, tablet mode, tent mode, stand mode, and of course laptop mode.

Under the hood, the device can pack the latest 11th-gen Intel Core processors or AMD Ryzen Mobile CPUs with Radeon Graphics. It can pack up to AMD Ryzen 7 5700U CPU or the 11th-gen Intel Core i7-1165G7 CPU, paired with up to 16GB of DDR4 RAM and 512GB of onboard storage.

Inspiron 13

Coming to the next one, the Inspiron 13 is essentially a thin and light laptop that offers a “best in class” screen experience along with portability. It is made out of light aluminum and weighs around 1.25kgs.

The device boasts a 13.3-inch QHD+ display and the Dell ComfortView Plus, which is an integrated TUV low-light hardware solution that allows users to spend long hours in front of their laptops without straining their eyes.

Turning to the internals, the Inspiron 13 can pack up to the 11th-gen Intel Core i7-11370H CPU coupled with up to 16GB of LPDDR4x RAM and 512GB of SSD storage. As for the I/O, the device packs 1x HDMI, 1x USB-A, 2x Thunderbolt 4.0, and a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Inspiron 14 and 15

The Inspiron 14 and 15 are similar laptops with varying screen sizes. So, as you can tell, the Inspiron 14 packs a 14-inch display, while the Inspiron 15 comes with a 15-inch panel. Other than this, all the other specs of the devices are similar to each other.

The laptops include Intel’s H-series processor along with the Nvidia MX450 GPU. Or, you can configure it to pack the latest AMD Ryzen Mobile Processors with Radeon Graphics. As per the company, the Inspiron 14 and 15 strikes a “perfect balance of style, performance, and productivity” to cater to all kinds of users in the market.

The Inspiron 14 and 15 can pack up to the 11th-gen Intel Core i7-11370H processor along with Intel’s Irix Xe GPU or the Nvidia GeForce MX450 GPU. On the other hand, the Inspiron 14 AMD model packs the AMD Ryzen 5 5500U CPU with Radeon Graphics. The Inspiron 15 AMD model, however, can pack up to AMD Ryzen 7 5700U CPU. The Intel models can pack up to 16GB of DDR4 RAM and up to 512GB of SSD storage.

Price and Availability

The Dell Inspiron 13 will be available for a starting price of Rs 68,990 and go on sale starting from July 7 in India. On the other hand, the Inspiron 14 starts at Rs 44,990, and the Inspiron 15 starts at Rs 48,990 for the Intel SKUs and Rs 57,990 for the AMD SKUs. The Inspiron 14 and 15 Intel models will be available to buy from June 18, while the Inspiron 15 AMD models will come into the market on June 22.

All of the new Inspiron models will be available to buy from Dell’s official online store and major offline retail stores across the country. They will also be available on Amazon and select Dell exclusive outlets in India.

Update the detailed information about Dell Xps 17 Review: A Masterful Windows Workhorse on the Moimoishop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!