Trending February 2024 # Eu Politicians Clash Over Copyright Levies # Suggested March 2024 # Top 4 Popular

You are reading the article Eu Politicians Clash Over Copyright Levies updated in February 2024 on the website Moimoishop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Eu Politicians Clash Over Copyright Levies

An E.U. proposal to place copyright levies on cloud computing services would be a complete disaster if implemented, according to a member of the European Parliament.

Pirate Party MEP Christian Engstrom said Tuesday that he could not envision a proposal worse than that of French MEP Françoise Castex, who presented her plan for the overhaul of the Copyright Directive to the Parliament’s legal affairs committee Monday. She said her proposal will make the issue of copyright levies and downloading clearer across the European Union.

“The very principle of levies is all wrong, we should be reducing them, not increasing them,” Engstrom said in response.

Castex believes that “the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the right to copying for private use with fair remuneration to rightholders, and that it is a system worth preserving.”

The Castex proposal says that “private copies of protected works made using cloud computing technology may have the same purpose as those made using traditional and/or digital recording media and materials” and that they could therefore be subject to levies as well. The Commission should determine how these private copies of protected works could be taken into account by the private copying compensation mechanisms, she said.

It is this part of the text that Engstrom finds the most worrisome. In a worst-case scenario consumers could end up paying twice for transferring legally purchased content between their own accounts.

However, Castex said that “private copying exemption arrangements enable consumers to copy freely their musical and audio-visual material from one medium to another without the need to seek the authorisation of rightholders, provided that this is for private use.”

Digitization is having a huge impact on how cultural goods are being produced, distributed, marketed and consumed, according to Castex. Lower distribution costs can facilitate access to creative works, but at a time of budget austerity, private copying levies constitute a vital source of revenue for the cultural sector, she said.

European Commission figures show that the sum total of private copying levies collected in 23 of the 28 E.U. member states has more than tripled since the current Copyright Directive came into force in 2002 and now stands at more than €600 million ($814 million).

In her proposal, Castex urges member states and rightholders to “replace their anti-piracy campaigns with ‘positive’ campaigns highlighting the benefits of private copying levies.”

The European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) said that it was pleased with the text. The organization represents more than 800,000 creators in Europe across a range of artistic sectors.

“We particularly welcome the report’s assertion that private copying levy should apply to all material, media and services whose value resides in their private recording and storage capacity,” it said in a statement. “In addition, private copying compensation should also be payable vis-à-vis new online services such as cloud computing.”

But Digital Europe, a European association representing the digital technology industry, is strongly against the proposals.

“The current approach of financing culture and creativity by not only protecting an antiquated levy system but by expanding it to new digital developments reduces the use of technology to the consumption of cultural products. Far more it fails to acknowledge market realities and the well-documented mutual benefit and close collaboration of the culture sector and the ICT industry,” said the organization in a statement.

You're reading Eu Politicians Clash Over Copyright Levies

Posting A Copyright Notice On Social Media Doesn’t Actually Accomplish Anything

If you’ve logged into Instagram since last week, you may have seen people posting a long, typo-laden screed about a new rule going into effect that gives the company the ability to sell, use, or share your photos unless you repost a specific message denying it. I have even seen a few famous photographers doing it.

The statement sounds official, but it’s actually just the latest iteration of an internet chain letter that won’t do anything to protect your privacy or intellectual property from the social media networks or the wilds of the internet in general.

Various versions of the message exist, but they culminate with a declaration of “Instagram does not have my permission to share photos or messages.” Unfortunately, you can type this all you want—or run and shout it out loud at a semi-crowded Dave & Busters—and it still doesn’t change the fact that you have, in fact, given Instagram and other social media services the right to share your images and more.

Dig into the Instagram terms of service and you’ll find a section about permissions you give the company. These legal terms used to be even more complicated, but they got slightly simpler thanks to the European GDPR regulations, which require companies to clarify the actual cost of signing up for their services.

Under the Permissions topic, you’ll find the following phrase: ”We do not claim ownership of your content, but you grant us a license to use it.” Simply put, this means that Instagram doesn’t require you to turn over the intellectual property of your photos and videos to them completely—you still own that media and can sell it or sign it over to someone else if you want.

The terms go on to explain the license you’re granting the company. Here’s the more complicated section. “…You hereby grant to us a non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to host, use, distribute, modify, run, copy, publicly perform or display, translate, and create derivative works of your content (consistent with your privacy and application settings).”

If you’ve spent any amount of time examining the terms of service for social media networks or even photo contests held online, these phrases probably sound familiar. You’ll find very similar terms on Facebook and Twitter as well.

Back in 2012, two of those terms showed up in the Instagram agreement after Facebook purchased it: “transferable,” and “sub-licensable.” It caused an outcry. The concern was that this gave the company the ability to basically sell user photos as if they were stock images, which wasn’t technically the case and it certainly hasn’t panned out that way.

Interestingly, however, Instagram and Facebook does have a little leeway when it comes to using your name or likeness as they relate to sponsored content. For example, you may have seen sponsored Facebook posts above which you’ll find a list of other friends that have liked that content or the brand sponsoring it. In that case, Facebook and Instagram have the right to display your name and even your profile picture next to the sponsored content you liked. It’s complicated, but the system has been in place for years without much backlash.

As for Instagram sharing your private messages, the company specifically says it can share your content, “consistent with your privacy and application settings,” which means it will keep private stuff private, at least to the best of its ability. That’s not to say that someone couldn’t get access to it, however, through a hack or a data breach. If that’s something you’re very worried about, you could consider a service like WhatsApp, which is also owned by Facebook, but encrypts your messages so they’re mostly useless to a hacker.

If you’re really concerned about protecting your photo and video copyright, there is an official process through which you can submit your works on chúng tôi It’s a somewhat tedious process, but it will give you stronger legal ground on which to stand if someone infringes your photos or videos.

If you’re still not comfortable with the terms, you can terminate Instagram’s licenses to your images by deleting the content—though that’s not the case with every social media network. So, if you’re really concerned about companies using your images, you may have to suck it up and actually read those terms you typically skip during sign-up.

Advantages Of Coffeescript Over Javascript

What is JavaScript?

It is a loosely typed language that is mainly used in development. We can use javascript both in frontend as well as backend development. The nature of programs is synchronous and executed line by line. You can run javascript on any system or browser as it contains a javascript engine.

What is CoffeeScript?

CoffeeScript is a subset of javascript in a naive way and is compiled into javascript internally. It is a lightweight language in nature, having user-friendly syntaxes which are contrary to the complex syntax of JavaScript. Many languages like Perl, Python, and Ruby, along with JavaScript, have influenced CoffeeScript.

Benefits of CoffeeScript compared to Javascript

Let’s see some of the benefits CoffeeScript provides in comparison to javascript −

CoffeeScript comes up with easy-to-understand programming syntax compared to complex functions and expressions in Javascript. For Example, CoffeeScript only comes up with an option to use the === and !== operators to avoid the confusion caused by operators in javascript.

There is a probability of reducing your code by more than 50% with CoffeeScript. Therefore, the developers can understand the prewritten codes in less time, which might increase their productivity in one way.

Multiple programming languages, including python, inspire CoffeeScript; it uses the way indentation is used in python. It means there are spaces to differentiate the program.

CoffeeScript contains a method to handle more than one return value, and it is mainly implemented with the use of destructing assignment syntax. This feature of CoffeeScript is influenced by C# language because it introduced a tuple.

One more feature of CoffeeScript is inspired by C#, which uses switch statements. In the case of an accidental javascript fall, thoughts may happen, and CoffeeScript can automatically put a break after any switch or else statement to move out of the block.

CoffeeScript has a feature of class-based inheritance for the code. Being a prototype language javascript doesn’t contain class features or any other Object Oriented Programming feature.

Syntactical Differences in Functions

It’s time to check the syntactical difference between CoffeeScript and Javascript −

Functions

If we declare a function in CoffeeScript, then it is going to look like this −

The same program in Javascript will look like this −

var increased_value; increased_value = function (value) { return value + 1; }; Indentation

Like python, CoffeeScript also uses whitespaces for indentation to separate blocks of code, while JavaScript uses curly braces to represent a block of code.

Syntax CoffeeScript for x in [1..50] if x%5==0 chúng tôi "#{x}"

Same code in JavaScript −

var i, x; for (x = i = 1; i <= 50; x = ++i) { if (x % 5 === 0) { console.log(`${x}`); } }

Here is a neck-to-neck comparison between JavaScript and CoffeeScript with the help of a Table −

JavaScript

CoffeeScript

In JavaScript, different scopes like block, local, and global scopes create certain scope problems.

In CoffeeScript, there is no need to declare variables, reducing the scope problems to 0.

Bigger Code has a harder syntax to understand.

Smaller Code can be understood easily by the programmer as well.

Special characters like curly braces and semicolons are used for the indentation of the program.

Spaces are used for indentation purposes.

The JS compiler points out fewer syntax errors.

More syntax errors are pointed out by CoffeeScript, which are problematic.

Javascript is not dependent on any other programming language.

CoffeeScript is dependent on Javascript in case of any miscellaneous issues.

10 Classic Motorcycles To Drool Over

Honda CBX engine. Honda

This story originally featured on Motorcyclist.

For a motorcycle to stand the test of time it needs to be in some way significant to the motorcycle world. Some motorcycles prove their import by the length of their production run. Others, particularly ahead-of-their-time motorcycles, prove their worth by increasing their appeal long after their production run ends. It seems like Honda has produced an inordinate number of motorcycles of lasting significance and interest.

The following list is by no means comprehensive of the all-time great Honda motorcycles—and, in fact, excludes some of the most iconic, collectible motorcycles that Big Red has ever built. Rare or homologation-spec bikes like the NR750, RC30 or RC45, VFR400, NSR250R, etc., are not present here. Instead, this list comprises models that for the most part are readily available on the used market.

Some of the bikes included have persisted in Honda’s lineup for decades; others had short production runs that only served to increase their current desirability. The hard part: narrowing the list down to just 10.

Honda Super Cub

The 2023 Honda Super Cub C125 ABS. The latest version of the most used motor vehicle in the world. Honda

If there’s one motorcycle that has been immune to the march of time, it’s the Honda Super Cub. In production (in various generations) since 1958, Honda has sold more than 100 million units of the little step-through. Which reportedly makes it the highest-selling motor vehicle in history.

When Honda reintroduced the Super Cub C125 ABS to the US market in 2023, it seemed like things came full circle. For decades, the Super Cub had been a workhouse in developing nations, where its utility and affordability made it ubiquitous—far removed from the spirit of leisure that it inspired in American riders in the 1960s. These days, its practicality is just as appealing to American riders looking for basic, easy transportation as is its reputation for “niceness.” You may meet the nicest people on a Honda, but you’ll also meet practical people on a Honda. Not that the two are mutually exclusive.

2004 Honda RC51

Pictured: 2002 Honda RC51. From the era of great V-twin racebikes. Honda

When it hit showroom floors at the dawn of the new millennium with a price tag of $9,999, it put the RC moniker within reach of the (relative) masses and looked like a bargain next to the Italian competition—which it promptly started beating on racetracks around the world. For race fans, the RC51 will always be associated with its two most notable protagonists: Colin Edwards and Nicky Hayden. These days, it’s like riding racing history. The most coveted model is the SP2, particularly the 2004 Nicky Hayden replica variant.

2001 Honda Gold Wing

The 2001 Honda Gold Wing is still an amazingly competent motorcycle. In the right hands, it can put to shame many sportier bikes in the twisties. Honda

Depending on who you’re talking to, the Gold Wing could be considered Honda’s flagship motorcycle. For a company whose heritage is firmly entrenched in racing, that’s a testament to the popularity of the Wing. Now in its sixth generation, the Gold Wing hardly resembles the original four-cylinder, fairing-less machine of 1974.

The Gold Wing practically created the heavyweight touring category and is still the benchmark for two-up, long-distance touring. Honda built a gajillion of the previous generation GL1800 Gold Wings (2001–2024), so if you’re looking for impressive touring performance for a song, chances are you can find one for the right price.

1994 Honda VFR750F (RC36-2)

While the fuel-injected VFR800F is also highly lauded, the final carbureted Veefer is (to those of us who rode them) the pinnacle of VFR-dom. Honda

When it comes to Honda V-4 sportbikes, motorcyclists have long wondered “what if?”

By splicing the Interceptor family tree into two branches—the unattainable and the “plebeian”—and by focusing its sporting endeavors on its inline-four-powered CBRs, Honda denied consumers one of their greatest dreams: a mass-produced V-4 race-replica sportbike.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. Back to the VFR750F. In the ’90s, the VFR was one heck of a motorcycle: “plebeian” only in its price and availability. From ’90–‘97, the VFR showed up on Cycle World’s Ten Best list every single year. It’s not too much of a stretch to claim it’s one of the most universally acclaimed Hondas of all time thanks to its near-race-rep levels of performance and all-around usability. Honda’s reputation for refinement is no more exemplified than on the VFR, its liquid-smooth powerband a testament to the simple beauty of a cable-actuated throttle and a perfectly tuned carburetor.

Be that as it may, we can’t help but wonder, “What if the Interceptor had continued as Big Red’s sportbike platform?” And, can we please have a modern version of the RC36-2?

1993 Honda CBR900RR

The best part of the 1990s: the sportbikes. Honda

It’s no stretch to say the 1993 Honda CBR900RR was a big factor in starting the liter-class wars of the following decade. At the time, liter-class motorcycles were more GT bikes than track weapons—think Kawasaki ZX-11. So when the CBR came out in 1993, weighing 144 pounds less than the ZX-11 (yes, you read that correctly), we should have known everything was about to change.

Since then, the CBR has been a mainstay in Honda’s lineup even while other bikes, like the RC51, made racetrack headlines. Tadao Baba’s original Blade is still one of the most iconic sportbikes of all time.

1990 Honda Hawk GT NT650

In Japan, the NT650 carried the model name “Bros,” not Hawk GT. There’s probably a joke in there somewhere. Honda

Imagine if Honda unveiled a 647cc V-twin naked bike with a racy twin-spar aluminum frame and a trick single-sided swingarm designed by ELF at EICMA in 2023. It’d be the talk of the show. You’d want it. We’d all want it.

The thing is, Honda built this very thing from 1988–1990. The NT650, or Hawk GT, wasn’t a hot seller. But now it’s a cult classic. It’s greyhound-like litheness makes the SV650 look like a barrel-shaped labrador retriever.

The Hawk GT is kind of a greatest-hits album of motorcycling must-haves. It’s undeniably cool yet has a utilitarian vibe, it’s light and sporty, it’s practically bulletproof. There’s just something about it. Something universal. The Hawk is so appealing and affordable that some people own several at once.

1989 Honda GB500

Honda’s answer to the “classic 500cc British single,” the GB500 Tourist Trophy. Honda

Honda’s interpretation of the classic 500cc British single, the GB500 Tourist Trophy is another cult classic. Built from 1989–1990, the GB never sold well. First, it was a single, and Americans haven’t been too keen on singles since, well, somebody put two cylinders in a frame. Secondly, 30 years ago, classic café racer styling wasn’t as en vogue as it is today. So what we have here is an ahead-of-its time motorcycle based on an old-fashioned-style motorcycle that was never immensely popular with Americans in the first place. In other words, a marketer’s nightmare.

Anyway, the GB500′s air-cooled mill was derived from the 1983 XR500 dirt bike, and sported a single 42mm round-slide Keihin carburetor. It also had preload-adjustable Showa suspension, electric-start and a kickstarter, and a single disc brake up front. And it weighed less than 400 pounds fully fueled. What’s not to like, America?

It may not be a real-deal Velocette or BSA, but it is a classic in its own right. Then again, Honda didn’t build the GB thinking it ever would be, you’d imagine. It’s classic for the very fact that it _isn’t_ an old British single, but a motorcycle built in Japan in the ’80s by people who romanticized a glorious era before their own. In other words, it was an idea that didn’t catch on until decades later. Classic Honda.

1983 Honda VF750F Interceptor

Along with the first-gen Suzuki GSX-R750, the Honda Interceptor, in many ways, is the first iteration of the modern sportbike. Honda

Honda has long been synonymous with four-stroke V-4s, thanks in large part to the groundbreaking 1983 Honda Interceptor, one of the first production motorcycles, along with the 1985 Suzuki GSX-R750, to create the sportbike category as we know it. Americans, common thinking of the time went, only cared about straight-line performance. The Interceptor either proved otherwise, or gave us a reason to fall in love with corners. It wasn’t long before consumers went sportbike mad—ironic, considering Honda’s primary objective for the Interceptor was racetrack success.

For the 1983 season, the AMA decreased the displacement limit in the superbike class from 1,000cc to 750cc with the hope of remedying the sphincter-testing handling qualities of the era’s brute-ish superbikes. While the Interceptor won six straight races in ’83, Wayne Rainey won the championship aboard a Muzzy Kawasaki GPz750. Then Honda went on to win the next five championships.

1979 Honda CBX1000

Look at all those header pipes! Honda

The 1979 CBX seems to represent broader cultural tastes than it does the motorcycling world’s own development trends. Consider: the Interceptor’s debut was only four years away, and the “light means right” mantra not far behind it. The CBX wasn’t a sportbike per se. It wasn’t a Gold Wing either. It was just…cool. The way its 1,047cc engine dangles beneath the frame sans downtubes, giving an uninterrupted view of its six glorious chromed header pipes accentuates its six-iness. The CBX is a double-take bike because it almost looks wrong. So, so wrong.

The CBX was designed by Soichiro Irimajiri, who was responsible for the now-legendary six-cylinder RC165 and RC166 grand prix racers. You can almost hear the Honda marketing men saying, “And if a little magic happens to rub off from Hailwood’s machines, then so be it.” And that association is just about where the CBX’s racing credentials end. While Honda notoriously added cylinders to its racebikes in the ’60s in search of more revs and more horsepower, the CBX revved to a conservative 9,000 rpm and produced 105 hp. Wet weight was a burly 600 pounds.

The CBX persists in giving the impression that Honda built it just because it could. It didn’t impact the motorcycling world like the Gold Wing or Interceptor did, but here we are still talking about it. And mentioning the RC166 in the same breath.

1969 Honda CB750

The motorcycle that changed the course of the sport forever. Honda

The CB750 can be considered both a fitting end and a rapturous beginning. Taking into account all Honda’s success in grand prix racing with multicylinder machines and its reputation for mass-producing reliable, affordable small-displacement single- and twin-cylinder motorcycles, the CB750 seemed to be the culmination of Honda’s decades-long work. At the same time, it triggered the beginning of a new era in which Japanese four-cylinders became the prevalent performance-oriented motorcycle.

The CB750 changed the motorcycle world.

There are plenty of other models that could fit on this list, like the CB400 or the XR650L. What other models do you think could make the cut? Comment below.

Cyberattacks Affected More Internet Users Than Hardware Failures In The Eu Last Year

Although cyberattacks caused just 6 percent of significant outages of public electronic communications networks and services in the E.U. last year, they affected more people than hardware failure, a much more common factor in service disruptions, according to a report from the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA).

Hardware failure accounted for 38 percent of all incidents and affected over 1.4 million users on average according to an annual incidents report released Tuesday by ENISA. By comparison, incidents that resulted from cyberattacks affected 1.8 million users on average.

Cyberattacks affected primarily Internet access and were the second most common cause for outages of fixed Internet service in particular, accounting for 20 percent of those incidents, ENISA said. They also accounted for around 13 percent of incidents that disrupted mobile Internet service.

The ENISA report compiles data on 79 incidents that occurred across 18 E.U. member states in 2012 and resulted in severe outages of both mobile and fixed telephony and Internet services. ENISA defines fixed Internet and telephony services as those offered through dial-up, DSL, cable, fiber, PSTN, VoIP over DSL and other wired networks.

Providers of electronic communication services are required to report significant network security and integrity breaches to national regulatory agencies, which in turn report them to ENISA and the European Commission. Nine countries did not report any incidents for 2012 and one country hasn’t implemented reporting capabilities yet, ENISA said.

Organizing the chaos

The agency organized incidents into five root cause categories, but also split them by more detailed causes. The root cause categories were system failure, third-party failure, malicious actions, human errors and natural phenomena.

The most common root cause for incidents that resulted in outages was system failure. This accounted for 76 percent of outages and included incidents caused by both hardware and software issues. Most incidents in the system failure category affected switches, including routers and local exchange points, and home location registries, ENISA said.

Third-party failures accounted for 13 percent of incidents, malicious actions accounted for 8 percent, natural phenomena for 6 percent and human errors for 5 percent. Some incidents fell into multiple categories, the agency said.

Incidents caused by natural phenomena—storms, floods, heavy snowfall, earthquakes and other natural disasters—and those caused by human error resulted in the longest outages, 36 hours and 26 hours on average, respectively. However, they affected relatively low numbers of users at 557,000 and 447,000 on average.

Outages resulting from malicious actions, including physical attacks against network equipment, cyberattacks and cable theft, affected 1.5 million users on average and lasted for 4 hours.

Outages that resulted from third-party failures affected the largest number of users, 2.8 million and lasted for 13 hours, while those caused by system failures lasted nine hours and affected 2.3 million users, on average.

Outages resulting from malicious actions, including physical attacks against network equipment, cyberattacks and cable theft, affected 1.5 million users on average and lasted for 4 hours.

ENISA’s report does not include details about specific incidents and does not reveal the names of the affected service providers. However it does provide some examples of incidents it received over the past two years.

One incident caused by a cyberattack was described like this: “A series of Distributed Denial of Service attacks targeted a provider’s domain name service. Up to 2.5 million mobile Internet users were affected during 1-2 hours. The attacking IP-addresses were tracked and blocked, the load balancing units were restarted and the traffic could be recovered. As post-incident actions additional DNS servers were installed, configuration changes were made on firewalls and hardware was expanded to withstand similar attacks.”

The statistics in the report suggests that the percentage of incidents caused by cyberattacks increased in 2012 compared to 2011. However, ENISA warned that data from only two years of reporting is not enough to draw conclusions about any trends.

Overall, mobile networks were most affected by outages with 50 percent of all reported incidents affecting mobile telephony or mobile Internet services.

“In 37 percent of the incidents there was impact on emergency calls using the emergency number 112,” ENISA said.

Apple Sue Htc Over Iphone Patent Infringement

Apple sue HTC over iPhone patent infringement [Updated with full patent list]

Sad faces over at HTC today, we’d wager, as Apple unleashes their latest patent-related lawsuit on the makers of the Hero, Desire and Legend.  Filed in the US District Court in Delaware together with the US ITC, the suit alleges that HTC have infringed on twenty Apple patents that are all related to the iPhone, whether it’s UI, architecture or hardware.  It’s also accompanied by the usual “create your own tech, don’t steal ours” quote from CEO Steve Jobs.

“We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it … We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours” Steve Jobs, CEO, Apple

We’ll have to go dig through the lawsuit to figure out exactly which patents Apple reckons HTC have illicitly borrowed, but we’re guessing it’s the same bevy of multitouch tech that they’ve previously threatened Palm over.  Apple maintains they hold the intellectual rights to much of the multitouch gesture technology we’ve grown used to seeing included in modern smartphones, such as pinch-zoom.

Update:Full list of supposedly infringed patents (of which there seem to be 10, not the 20 Apple suggest in their press release) from Gizmodo:

The ‘331 Patent, entitled “Time-Based, Non-Constant Translation Of User Interface Objects Between States,” was duly and legally issued on April 22, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The ‘949 Patent, entitled “Touch Screen Device, Method, And Graphical User Interface For Determining Commands By Applying Heuristics,” was duly and legally issued on January 20, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘949 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

The ‘849 Patent, entitled “Unlocking A Device By Performing Gestures On An Unlock Image,” was duly and legally issued on February 2, 2010 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘849 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

The ‘381 Patent, entitled “List Scrolling And Document Translation, Scaling, And Rotation On A Touch-Screen Display,” was duly and legally issued on December 23, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘381 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

The ‘726 Patent, entitled “System And Method For Managing Power Conditions Within A Digital Camera Device,” was duly and legally issued on July 6, 1999 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘726 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.

The ‘076 Patent, entitled “Automated Response To And Sensing Of User Activity In Portable Devices,” was duly and legally issued on December 15, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘076 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit F.

The ‘105 Patent, entitled “GMSK Signal Processors For Improved Communications Capacity And Quality,” was duly and legally issued on December 8, 1998 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘105 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit G.

The ‘453 Patent, entitled “Conserving Power By Reducing Voltage Supplied To An Instruction-Processing Portion Of A Processor,” was duly and legally issued on June 3, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘453 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit H.

The ‘599 Patent, entitled “Object-Oriented Graphic System,” was duly and legally issued on October 3, 1995 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘599 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit I.

The ‘354 Patent, entitled “Object-Oriented Event Notification System With Listener Registration Of Both Interests And Methods,” was duly and legally issued on July 23, 2002 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ‘354 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit J.

Update: According to Engadget Apple have submitted over 700 pages of exhibits to support their case; HTC may have only just found out about this, but it looks like Cupertino’s legal team have been working on it for some time.  They also list the named devices in the case:

Nexus One, Touch Pro, Touch Diamond, Touch Pro2, Tilt II, Pure, Imagio, Dream / G1, myTouch 3G, Hero, HD2, and Droid Eris

Apparently while both Android and Windows Mobile devices are fingered, the former are flagged up for running Android while the latter only get a mention thanks to the DSP chips they incorporate.

Press Release:

Apple Sues HTC for Patent Infringement

CUPERTINO, California—March 2, 2010—Apple® today filed a lawsuit against HTC for infringing on 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone’s user interface, underlying architecture and hardware. The lawsuit was filed concurrently with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and in U.S. District Court in Delaware.

“We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO. “We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.”

Apple reinvented the mobile phone in 2007 with its revolutionary iPhone®, and did it again in 2008 with its pioneering App Store, which now offers more than 150,000 mobile applications in over 90 countries. Over 40 million iPhones have been sold worldwide.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.

Update the detailed information about Eu Politicians Clash Over Copyright Levies on the Moimoishop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!