Trending February 2024 # How The U.s. Coast Guard Is Fixing The N.j. Oil Spill Caused By Sandy # Suggested March 2024 # Top 3 Popular

You are reading the article How The U.s. Coast Guard Is Fixing The N.j. Oil Spill Caused By Sandy updated in February 2024 on the website Moimoishop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 How The U.s. Coast Guard Is Fixing The N.j. Oil Spill Caused By Sandy

Crews will be working for at least one to two weeks to clean up a storm-related diesel fuel spill on the New Jersey coast, according to a Coast Guard official.

The oil came from two 3.15 million gallon-capacity tanks at the Motiva petroleum storage facility, in Sewaren, N.J., damaged during Hurricane Sandy. Each contained 336,000 gallons of oil prior to the storm. The site is located on the Arthur Kill, a 10-mile-long, 600-foot wide tidal strait dividing mainland New Jersey from Staten Island, N.Y.

According to MarketWatch, Motiva has estimated that around 227,200 gallons of oil leaked from the damaged tanks. The Coast Guard has not confirmed that number. Two other nearby tanks, also holding 336,000 gallons of diesel fuel each, made it through the storm intact.

The Monday night surge from superstorm Sandy flooded a gravel-lined containment area around the tanks that was supposed to contain a spill. One tank has a visible hole, says Chief Ryan Egal of the U.S. Coast Guard, and the entire area is strewn with the kinds of debris that, carried by a hurricane wind or record-breaking storm surge, could cause a lot of damage to a fixed structure. “I’m seeing a lot of railroad ties, docks, a lot of wood, general garbage that is basically from land,” Egal says.

The storm surge both overtopped and breached the protective berm around the tanks, carrying spilled oil into surrounding waterways. Responders have seen “a lot of [oil] sheen” around Motiva’s dock on the Arthur Kill, and in the waterway’s main navigation channel, says Egal, as well as in nearby Woodbridge and Smith’s creeks. Responders have deployed 13,600 feet of containment boom so far around Motiva’s dock and at the creek mouths to contain the spill. No sheen has been sighted on the New York side of the waterway, Egal states.

“Also, a lot of the responders are local,” he says. “They come here and do this and then have issues at home.” More than 1.4 million homes and businesses in New Jersey were still without power on Friday, according to Reuters.

On the up side, regular air testing by the Coast Guard’s Atlantic Strike Team has turned up no problems so far for both clean up workers or the nearby residential community, says Egal, one of the team’s hazardous materials specialists. Oxygen levels are normal; there are no detected levels of carbon monoxide or hydrogen sulfide; and volatile organic compound levels are consistent with what might be created by regular street traffic.

The Arthur Kill flows along a largely industrialized section of the New Jersey coast, just a few miles south of Newark International Airport. But it’s got a gentler side as well: the New York bank is mostly saltwater marsh, and in New Jersey, conservation groups have counted around 90 species of wild birds breeding in the greater Arthur Kill watershed. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists several dozen “species of special emphasis” that call the Arthur Kill area home: plants and animals that aren’t considered threatened or endangered, but who depend heavily upon this environment to survive and thrive.

“The marsh areas are definitely a long term issue,” says Chief Egal. “We can’t go in there and clean up.”

You're reading How The U.s. Coast Guard Is Fixing The N.j. Oil Spill Caused By Sandy

Crypto Recovery Rally Is No More! But What Caused The Disruption?

The on-setting of another crypto winter can stop the crypto recovery rally at the end of 2023

The highly volatile crypto market has started experiencing some hard and drastic crypto crash with popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or stablecoins like Tether and Terra. The crypto crash season started in 2023 and reached its highest peak from May to July 2023. Crypto investors are stuck in-between waiting for a crypto recovery rally or set to incur huge losses in this bear market rally. But crypto recovery rally helped Bitcoin to reach US$24k from US$17k in 2023. Thus, crypto investors are highly disappointed that the crypto recovery rally has stopped occurring in the crypto market post-crypto crash ecosystem. Let’s dig deep into the causes of disruption in the highly volatile crypto market. Crypto investors were coping with the crypto winter season due to several crypto crash cases. The improvement in prices of Bitcoin, Tether, Ethereum, and many more provided hope to crypto investors that the drastic period of the crypto crash is getting over through this crypto recovery rally. But the bear market rally has been successful in creating tension among crypto investors.  Long-term crypto investors hold onto their cryptocurrency assets with faith in a crypto recovery rally. There are multiple cryptocurrency projects from Ethereum, Shiba Inu, Cardano, and more that are helping in improving the current prices. But crypto investors have the understanding that the crypto market is nowhere near the status of crypto market in 2023. Meanwhile, some crypto analysts have analyzed that cryptocurrency liquidity has started recovering as the market cap of stablecoin has stopped dropping in the crypto market. It is still down by around 20% from the all-time high range. Still, the pause in the crypto recovery rally has started tightening the financial conditions for crypto investors. It has been speculated that the situation will be hard for the cryptocurrency cycle to the bottom level without fiat leverage growing.

The highly volatile crypto market has started experiencing some hard and drastic crypto crash with popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or stablecoins like Tether and Terra. The crypto crash season started in 2023 and reached its highest peak from May to July 2023. Crypto investors are stuck in-between waiting for a crypto recovery rally or set to incur huge losses in this bear market rally. But crypto recovery rally helped Bitcoin to reach US$24k from US$17k in 2023. Thus, crypto investors are highly disappointed that the crypto recovery rally has stopped occurring in the crypto market post-crypto crash ecosystem. Let’s dig deep into the causes of disruption in the highly volatile crypto market. Crypto investors were coping with the crypto winter season due to several crypto crash cases. The improvement in prices of Bitcoin, Tether, Ethereum, and many more provided hope to crypto investors that the drastic period of the crypto crash is getting over through this crypto recovery rally. But the bear market rally has been successful in creating tension among crypto investors. Long-term crypto investors hold onto their cryptocurrency assets with faith in a crypto recovery rally. There are multiple cryptocurrency projects from Ethereum, Shiba Inu, Cardano, and more that are helping in improving the current prices. But crypto investors have the understanding that the crypto market is nowhere near the status of crypto market in 2023. Meanwhile, some crypto analysts have analyzed that cryptocurrency liquidity has started recovering as the market cap of stablecoin has stopped dropping in the crypto market. It is still down by around 20% from the all-time high range. Still, the pause in the crypto recovery rally has started tightening the financial conditions for crypto investors. It has been speculated that the situation will be hard for the cryptocurrency cycle to the bottom level without fiat leverage growing. It has been speculated that the crypto market still will need two to three months to gain a more stabilized situation for crypto investors. It is because another crypto winter with crypto crash cases can be set in for popular cryptocurrencies. Thus, crypto investors can prioritize budget, and savings, create diversified portfolios and make smart investment decisions with cryptocurrencies and possibly incur losses.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Of The Galaxy S23 Is Manufactured By Samsung

Although the existence of a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip has long been assumed to be present in every Samsung Galaxy S23 model, a recent rumor says that Samsung and Qualcomm may have worked together to produce a custom version of the chip. Additionally, some speculations claim that the new course taken may change a sort of Samsung tradition that involves using two distinct processors depending on the reference market. When it came to the South Korean market and other less interesting ones (including Europe), Samsung shifted to the Exynos rather than the Snapdragon, which was normally installed in the USA and other countries.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 of the Galaxy S23 will be manufactured by Samsung rather than TSMC

A new rumor from 9to5Google further supports the notion that the next top-of-the-line handsets from the Korean manufacturer will exclusively include the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. According to materials that the reporters claim to have seen, we will discover a “custom” version of the Qualcomm processor. This version, which appears to have been given the name “Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Mobile Platform for Galaxy,” at least temporarily, is actually an overclocked version of the processor, with a clock speed that will go as high as 3.36GHz, where the “base” of the main X3 core stopped at 3.2 GHz.

Gizchina News of the week

Join GizChina on Telegram

Samsung Galaxy S23 and Galaxy S23+ rumored specifications

6.1-inch (S23) / 6.6-inch (S23+) (2340 x 1080 pixels) FHD+ Infinity-O Dynamic AMOLED 2X Display, 48-120Hz adaptive refresh rate, 240Hz Touch Sampling Rate in Game Mode, up to 1750 nits brightness, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection

3.36 Octa-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 4nm Mobile Platform with Adreno 740 GPU

8GB LPDDR5X RAM with 128GB/256GB UFS 4.0 storage

Android 13 with One UI 5.1

Dual SIM (nano + nano)

50MP rear camera with LED Flash, f/1.8 aperture, OIS, 12MP 120° Ultra Wide sensor, f/2.2 aperture. 10MP Telephoto lens with f/2.4 aperture, 3x optical zoom, OIS, 4K 60 fps, 8K 30fps

12MP front camera with f/2.2 aperture

Dust and Water resistant (IP68)

S23 Dimensions: 146.3 x 70.9 x 7.6mm; Weight: 167g

S23+ Dimensions: 157.8×76.2×7.6mm; Weight: 195g

5G SA/NSA, 4G VoLTE, Wi-Fi 6E, 802.11ax (2.4/5GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, UWB  (S23+ only), GPS + GLONASS, USB 3.1, NFC

3900mAh (S23) / 4700mAh (S23+) battery with support for 25W (S23) / 45W (S23+) fast charging, Qi wireless charging, Wireless PowerShare

But the speculation around this processor doesn’t end there. Some publications claim that the “Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Mobile Platform for Galaxy” will also feature a unique exception. In fact, it would appear that Qualcomm would have chosen to use Samsung-owned facilities for the fabrication of this specific chip, as it did for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 last year.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra rumored specifications

6.8-inch (3088 x 1440 pixels) Quad HD+ Infinity-O-Edge Dynamic AMOLED Display. 1-120Hz refresh rate, 240Hz Touch Sampling Rate in Game Mode, up to 1750 nits brightness, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection

3.36GHz Octa-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 4nm Mobile Platform with Adreno 740 GPU

8GB / 12GB LPDDR5X RAM with 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.0 storage

Android 13 with One UI 5.1

200MP rear camera with ISOCELL HP2 sensor, OIS, f/1.7 aperture. 12MP 120° Ultra Wide sensor with f/2.2 aperture. 10MP Telephoto lens for 3x zoom, f/2.4 aperture, OIS. 10MP Periscope lens for 10x zoom, f/4.9 aperture, 100x Space Zoom, Laser autofocus, 4K 60 fps, 8K 30fps, LED Flash

12MP front camera with f/2.2 aperture

Dust and Water resistant (IP68)

Dimensions: 163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9mm; Weight:233g

5G SA/NSA, 4G VoLTE, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, UWB, GPS + GLONASS, USB 3.1, NFC

5000mAh battery with 45W fast charging, Qi wireless charging

Two immediate effects would result from this: first, Samsung would have had more immediate and direct control over the chips, and second, this change would strongly encourage the two firms’ cooperation. And who knows, perhaps the first of future surprises will be a processor that has been overclocked.

China’s Huawei And Zte Grilled By U.s. Committee Over Spying Concerns

A U.S. congressional committee appeared to come away still in doubt about the security of networking equipment from Chinese firms Huawei Technologies and ZTE after holding a Thursday hearing in which the two companies tried to dispel allegations that they were tied to the Chinese government.

“I’m a little disappointed today. I was hoping for more transparency, more directness,” said the Chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, Representative Mike Rogers. “There is a sphere of government influence in your companies of which you either can’t identify their roles and responsibilities or won’t. Either way, its unacceptable.”

Thursday’s hearing was held as part of an investigation launched by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee to find if Huawei and ZTE posed a security threat to the nation given the increasing cyber attacks allegedly coming from China. U.S. officials are concerned networking gear bought from Huawei and ZTE could in fact be used by the Chinese government to spy on U.S. activities and steal sensitive information.

Both Huawei and ZTE, however, have tried to clear their reputations and on Thursday executives from the companies denied they had any ties with the Chinese government, stating that their firms would never sabotage a customer’s network. Both companies are also committed to improving cyber security, and following U.S. laws, they added.

“Huawei is an independent private employee-owned company,” said Charles Ding, a corporate senior vice president with the company. “Neither the Chinese government nor the PLA (People’s Liberation Army) has an ownership interest in our company, or any influence on daily operations, investment decisions, profit distributions or staffing.”

“The Committee’s central question has been: would ZTE grant China’s government access to ZTE telecom infrastructure equipment for a cyber attack?” said Zhu Jinyun, ZTE senior vice president for North America and Europe. “Mr. Chairman, let me answer emphatically: No! China’s government has never made such a request. If such a request were made, ZTE would be bound by U.S. law.”

During the congressional committee’s nearly year-long investigation, Huawei and ZTE have tried to answer questions regarding their operations and financing. But despite the efforts, Rogers said in the opening of Thursday’s hearing that the companies had provided “little actual evidence” to resolve the committee’s concerns, which included refusing to provide certain documents because they would violate China’s state-secret laws.

“It is strange the internal corporate documents of purportedly private sector firms are considered classified secrets in China. This fact alone gives us a reason to question their independence,” Rogers said.

But Huawei’s Ding said in a written statement for the hearing that the company had already provided a “wealth of information.” Some of the information asked for would have also been impossible to provide under the three-week time frame the committee had given the company, he wrote.

“The requests also sought highly sensitive, proprietary business information, which, we respectfully submit, no responsible company, foreign or domestic, would voluntarily produce,” the statement added.

During Thursday’s hearing, committee members also grilled Huawei and ZTE’s representatives with questions on their relationships with the Chinese government. These included inquiries as to whether the Chinese government directly funded any company activities, and whether the companies were selling products at a loss in the U.S., which executives from both Huawei and ZTE denied.

U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, however, said a key question was whether Huawei and ZTE had the independence to “say no” to the Chinese government. He then cited a Chinese state security law that would allow the Chinese government to inspect the communication equipment belonging to any company or individual.

Both company executives said they were unfamiliar with the law, but added that they would never harm a customer’s networks. Schiff, however, said that despite the companies’ good intentions, Chinese law and state of the country’s courts would prevent them from denying authorities access to such equipment.

“The plain language of Chinese law would require you to make your equipment available to the Chinese government upon their request, and I see no opportunity for you fight that in the Chinese court system,” he said.

Both Huawei and ZTE have been trying to expand their business in the U.S., but the companies, especially Huawei, have seen a resistance to their business activities. Last year, Huawei was denied participation in building a national wireless network because of security concerns, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce.

U.S. Representative Dutch Ruppersberger said in his opening remarks on Thursday that the investigation against Huawei and ZTE was not “political jousting” or “trade protectionism masquerading as national security,” and pointed to how China is hacking into U.S. networks and stealing intellectual property from the nation.

Huawei, however, contends its difficulties in the U.S. stem from misconceptions that have distorted the company’s record. To illustrate this, Huawei commissioned Dan Steinbock, an expert on U.S.-China trade relations, to write a report on the company, which was released the day before the hearing. In it, Steinbock argues U.S. lawmakers have yet to provide firm evidence to support their concerns against the company

“Today, Huawei is one of the most misunderstood companies in America,” the paper said. “Huawei’s activities in America are not a threat, but an opportunity to the United States.”

Top 5 Data Sets Showing The U.s. Dominance In The Semiconductor Industry

For instance, TSMC can not produce Huawei’s chips because the U.S. government says so. Why? This is because TSMC uses some U.S. technologies in the production process. If the U.S. takes away these technologies, TSMC, a Taiwanese company will face troubles. Let us now take a look at the five major aspects where the U.S. dominates

1. Global Share

In the 1980s, the global market share of the US semiconductor industry suffered a significant decline due to the impact of Japan. However, by 1997, the United States regained its leadership with more than 50% of the global market share. Well, since that time, the U.S. is not losing grip on this position. Today (2024), the total global market share of US semiconductor companies is 46%, the highest in the world. The second highest is South Korea with a total market share of 21%.

The European continent is not so keen on the semiconductor market. Thus, despite its huge size with 44 countries, it collectively has just 9% and this is even including Japan. While Taiwan manages 8% of the global semiconductor market share, China has 7%. Sales of US-based semiconductor companies will grow from $71.1 billion in 2001 to $ 257.5 billion in 2023. This is a significant increase and a compound annual growth rate of 6.65%.

2. Manufacturing process

Most of the semiconductor manufacturing in the United States is completed by American companies. The data shows that in 2023, 79.8% of the semiconductor wafer manufacturing capacity in the United States will come from companies headquartered in the United States. Semiconductor companies with headquarters in the Asia-Pacific region account for 9.5% of U.S. domestic production capacity, as shown in the chart below:

3. Export

U.S. semiconductor industry exports will total $62 billion in 2023. It is the fifth-largest U.S. export after refined oil, aircraft, crude oil, and natural gas. Of all electronics exports, semiconductors account for the largest share of U.S. exports. So long as the U.S. continue to have such major export, it will control the industry. Once you are not on good terms with the U.S., it will simply block its export and isolate you.

Gizchina News of the week 4. Research and development and expenditure

In 2023, U.S. semiconductor companies, including fabless, will spend $90.6 billion in R&D and capital spending. Among them, the total investment in research and development is $50.2 billion, with a compound annual growth rate of about 5.9% in the past two decades. Total investment per employee, as measured by total investment in research and development, new plant and equipment, grew to a record $206,000. The U.S. semiconductor industry is second only to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries in terms of R&D spending as a percentage of sales (18%), which is well ahead of China at 7.6% and Taiwan at 11%.

5. Employment and productivity

According to the SIA report, the number of talents directly involved in the semiconductor industry in the United States is 277,000. However, for every semiconductor person, 5.7 other jobs can be pulled. It means that the semiconductor industry creates 1.6 million jobs in the U.S.

Chinese semiconductor market is growing rapidly

Yole, a well-known semiconductor analyst firm, released its latest analysis of the global packaging market last year. It also provides insights into the growth rate of emerging and mature markets, capacity, capital expenditure and supply chain.

OSATs are increasing their revenue

Fixing The T: Advice From Terriers For Mbta’s New General Manager

Fixing the T: Advice from Terriers for MBTA’s New General Manager Apple Pay for Charlie Cards, longer trolleys where possible, service until 2 a.m. are among dozens of reader suggestions

Feature image by Justin Yeung via Unsplash. All icons by Designer/iStock

Transportation

Fixing the T: Advice from Terriers for MBTA’s New General Manager Apple Pay for Charlie Cards, longer trolleys where possible, service until 2 a.m. are among dozens of reader suggestions

Pretty much everyone agrees the MBTA is broken. The troubled Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, which oversees subway, bus, commuter rail, and ferry service in 176 communities across the state, has battled service cuts, deadly accidents, safety incidents, staffing shortages, and ongoing speed restrictions on the T that continue to make daily commuting a headache for hundreds of thousands of commuters. The latest snafu occurred this week when a Green Line B trolley derailed at Packard’s Corner Monday afternoon, creating a traffic logjam on Comm Ave for hours and requiring west-bound passengers to be bused from West Campus to Washington Street. 

Governor Maura Healey appointed Phillip Eng, former president of the Long Island Rail Road, as the MBTA’s new general manager this spring. With so many members of the BU community reliant on the T, we asked you to share your ideas on how to improve the T and restore confidence in the beleaguered system.

You did not disappoint. Read on to see the suggestions—and let us know any other ideas in the Comment section. 

Fares and costs

Photo by aphotostory/iStock

Schedules, timeliness, and speed

Buses

Photo by tupungato/iStock

The Green Line

Photo by Dave Green

Better integration of existing systems and improving overall service and infrastructure 

Bring back the Orange Line through Washington Street in the South End. It will help increase access to medical care at Boston Medical Center, a safety net hospital, and dental care at our dental school’s clinic. Currently patients have to take the bus to the Boston University Medical Campus, which many times is not the most direct route and may impinge on their ability to see a doctor or dentist for care. It would be wonderful if they brought that back as a second branch of the Orange Line. It could branch off at Tufts Medical Center and end at Nubian Station, which is a large hub for buses. This would connect many people taking the bus to Nubian with the T.

A more general improvement would be to have a system where you can tap to pay with NFC so that people could pay with their credit cards or phones when entering the bus or T.

I’ve commuted on the MBTA daily for almost a decade now. One of the key problems with the trains is the signaling and track infrastructure. They need to be updated so that the trains can run at full speed. We should be targeting speeds of 60-65 mph and the infrastructure needs to be able to support it. Another issue is the lack of consistency with when trains should arrive. It shouldn’t be acceptable to have 20 or so minutes between one train and the next. In areas like the southern part of the Red Line, it makes sense to have a bit longer between trains, as Ashmont and Braintree lines converge at JFK, but even then, passengers should be waiting less than 10 minutes per train.

Communications 

Photo by Janice Checchio

Miscellaneous recommendations 

Explore Related Topics:

Update the detailed information about How The U.s. Coast Guard Is Fixing The N.j. Oil Spill Caused By Sandy on the Moimoishop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!