Trending November 2023 # Intel Alder Lake Core I9 Benchmarks Faster Than M1 Max, With Major Caveats # Suggested December 2023 # Top 15 Popular

You are reading the article Intel Alder Lake Core I9 Benchmarks Faster Than M1 Max, With Major Caveats updated in November 2023 on the website Moimoishop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested December 2023 Intel Alder Lake Core I9 Benchmarks Faster Than M1 Max, With Major Caveats

Intel claimed earlier this month that its new Alder Lake Core i9 benchmarks faster than Apple’s M1 Max. As with all manufacturer claims (including those made by Apple), it doesn’t mean much until independently tested.

These tests have now been done using a chunky MSI GE76 Raider laptop, and do show that Intel’s claim is technically true – but there are some pretty major caveats …

We noted at the time that even Intel’s figures showed that its chip had massively higher power consumption, and Macworld says that benchmarks reveal the full extent of this.

First, most of the performance improvements of the Core i9 chip are marginal.

Geekbench is a general, overall usage benchmark that we use to test all of Apple’s chips in Macs and iPhones. In Geekbench 5’s multi-core CPU test, the Alder Lake Core i9 has a 5 percent lead over Apple’s processor. In the single-core test, Alder Lake’s improvement was 3.5 percent. That’s basically a draw. Alder Lake has a slight edge, but it many cases, you won’t even notice a difference.

When it comes to graphics, if you pair that Core i9 with an expensive Nvidia RTX3080 Ti GPU, then sure, the differences are dramatic. The PC achieves an OpenCL score of 143,594 against the M1 Max 59,774. But that’s not an, uh, apples for apples comparison. Use Intel’s on-board integrated GPU, and things look very different. There Intel scores just 21,097.

Macworld didn’t have an M1 Max machine to benchmark against the Intel one for Cinebench R32 (a good test of 3D modeling performance), but even paired to a high-end GPU, Intel only managed a score of 15,981 against the M1 Pro’s 12,381, so it seems likely that the M1 Max would win this one.

When it comes to power efficiency, Intel is nowhere.

During the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the Alder Lake laptop was consistently in the 100-watt range, with spikes between 130 and 140 watts. [AnandTech] found that the M1 Max’s power draw was 39.7 watts versus over 100 for the 11-gen MSI GE76 Raider. That’s a lot less than Alder Lake.

In PCWorld’s testing, the MSI GE76 Raider got 6 hours of offline video playback, a far cry from the MacBook Pro’s 17 hours. That’s a huge difference, especially in a laptop. Granted, the MSI GE76 Raider won’t venture too far from a power outlet and has completely different demands than the MacBook Pro, but Apple has managed to deliver speeds that are nearly as impressive as Intel’s best without sacrificing efficiency.

Macworld’s Roman Loyola also notes that the Windows laptop used for these benchtests costs twice as much.

The laptop tested costs $3,999 and represents the absolute top-of-the-line Intel has to offer in a laptop. Apple’s 14-inch MacBook Pro costs half as much and performs nearly as well.

That’s before we even talk aesthetics…

And sure, the Raider is a laptop in name only, and will generally be run on mains power. But if you’re going to make that argument, then the relevant comparison will be the upcoming Mac Pro against a top-end Windows desktop. That one should be interesting!

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You're reading Intel Alder Lake Core I9 Benchmarks Faster Than M1 Max, With Major Caveats

Intel’S Core I9 Extreme Processor Delivers 18 Cores Of Computing Power

The Logic Behind the Madness

A company with as much experience and prestige as Intel doesn’t just add cores to its chips all willy-nilly without having a strategy. We can assume quite safely that the i9 wasn’t made with the average home user in mind, so why would Intel just go ahead and release such a monster destined for the desktop PC and not a server environment?

There can only be one answer: AMD has become a thorn in its side with the announcement of its new “Threadripper” CPUs which boast an impressive sixteen cores.

To remain competitive, Intel has to work on improving its innovative chip architecture and gain any edge it can to continue to appeal to professionals who want good returns on their investments. The fact that there’s a market for the massive sixteen-core AMD chip gives Intel some hope of getting in on some of the action with an early release of a slightly more monstrous CPU.

Why Would You Need Eighteen Cores?

In all honesty, for the applications that even the most avid gamers run on their computers, an eight-core processor provides more than enough muscle to get the job done. Any extra core on the CPU means less attrition in the form of lag because of resource-hogging applications. Eight cores can run eight very intense processes with very little noticeable interruption to the flow of the operating system as a whole.

For professionals like 3D modelers and architects, however, the story is a bit different. Some people need as many cores as possible to run programs that do a lot of work in parallel. By jumping from eight to sixteen or eighteen cores, they’ll see a massive boost in performance. This makes them more productive, which in turn keeps their bosses happy.

Most of the programs we run in everyday life don’t reach this level of sophistication, so it would be a wasted investment to spend upwards of a thousand dollars on a processor that gives you little noticeable improvement. Applications like Skype, for example, will not be pumping all the cylinders you give it. It will try to run on one thread and keep to itself. The same goes for the majority of things we use. They will treat your CPU like a single core with the operating system allocating the power where it is appropriate. Having more cores isn’t without its uses, but it’s hard to foresee a day in the near future where you will absolutely need more than eight.

Miguel Leiva-Gomez

Miguel has been a business growth and technology expert for more than a decade and has written software for even longer. From his little castle in Romania, he presents cold and analytical perspectives to things that affect the tech world.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Intel Shows Off An Optane Memory H20 Drive, Along With Faster 670P Ssds

Intel may be selling its NAND division to storage rival SK Hynix, but the company will nonetheless introduce a newer, faster M.2 670P SSD, along with an updated Optane Memory drive.

The new 670P will feature a next-gen controller and support for Pyrite 2.0 encryption, and is rated for 150TBW for every 512GB of capacity. Intel said performance will improve thanks to better dynamic SLC cache, as well.

QLC drives store four bits of data per cell to cram as much data as possible into NAND memory. This increases capacity on the NAND, but tends to lead to sizeable performance hits. To compensate for this, drive makers configure the NAND’s unused capacity as SLC (single-level cell) as cache to improve performance.

Like most drives, the cache is dynamic and increases and decreases depending on the capacity. With the 670P, Intel said it improved this cache size to be about 11 percent larger over the previous 660P and 660P models. An empty 2TB 670P drive, for example, would have 280GB set aside as cache. About 24GB will be static cache that will remain constant no matter the drive’s capacity, and 256GB will be be set aside for dynamic cache. 

In the end, consumers should see higher performance from what has been a relatively low-cost class of SSDs. Intel said it’s selling three capacities in Q1 next year: 2TB, 1TB and 512GB. No prices were announced, but these drives will have to compete on an SSD playing field where there’s an oversupply of NAND.

Intel

New Optane Memory H20 Drive

Intel’s other consumer SSD news is a new iteration to its Optane Memory H10 drive. Like its predecessor, the Optane Memory H20 will be built using up to 1TB of QLC NAND and 32GB of Intel’s Optane memory. Optane offers magnitudes lower latency compared to traditional NAND, but can’t match its density or price.

Unlike conventional NAND SSDs that are seen as a single drive by the system, Optane Memory drives are actually two drives—but they’re still seen as a single drive by the system once the Intel RST Drive and supporting BIOS is configured to support it.

The new drive won’t arrive until the second quarter of 2023. Intel actually didn’t disclose pricing nor performance of both M.2 drives.

Intel

World’s fastest data Center SSD

In areas that won’t see service in consumer PCs, Intel also showed off its what it claims is not only the world’s fastest Optane drive, but also the fastest center drive: the P5800X.

The drive will support PCie 4.0 and is rated to hit 7.2GBps sequential read speeds and 6.2GB sequential write speeds. Random 4K IOPS read and write are rated at 1.5 million and up to 1.8 million IOPS on mixed 70/30 random IOPs.

“This is the world’s fastest data center SSD,” said Intel’s David Tuhy. “It’s a stunning product, we’re very proud of it. We think it’s a game changer.”

One telling example company officials cited was using Optane drives to buffer high speed network performance over 100GbE optical networks.

Intel said three 400GB P5800X Optane drives were able to effectively able to prevent buffer the network without saturation. Using its own 3.2TB D7-5600 SSDs would require seven of the drives.

Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated terabytes written for the 670P drive. PCWorld regrets the error.

Intel

Samsung Galaxy J Max Unboxing, Quick Review, Gaming And Benchmarks

Samsung Galaxy J Max Specifications

Edit

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy J Max

Display 7 inch IPS LCD display

Screen Resolution 800 x 1280 pixels

Operating System Android 5.1 Lollipop

Processor Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7

Chipset Spreadtrum SC8830

GPU Mali-400MP2

Memory 1.5 GB RAM

Inbuilt Storage 8 GB

Storage Upgrade Yes, up to 32 GB via microSD card

Primary Camera 8 MP, autofocus, LED flash

Video recording [email protected]

Secondary Camera 2 MP

Battery 4000 mAh

Fingerprint Sensor No

NFC No

4G ready Yes

SIM card type Single SIM

Waterproof No

Weight –

Dimensions 186.9 x 108.8 x 8.7 mm

Price Rs. 13,400

Samsung Galaxy J Max Unboxing

Samsung Galaxy J Max Contents

The Samsung Galaxy J Max comes with the following contents inside the box:

Tablet

Charger

USB cable

Startup Guide

Bluetooth Earpiece

Samsung Galaxy J Max 

Photo Gallery

Samsung Galaxy J Max 

Physical Overview

The Samsung Galaxy J Max comes with a 7-inch IPS LCD display with a screen resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels. It’s a very compact and sleek tablet with a thickness of just 8.7mm and it also feels quite light with thin bezels. It’s built out of plastic but feels good to hold and there is faux metal design running all over side of the device. Back is textured, which gives a good feel and grip while holding it.

On the top part, it has got the earpiece, 2MP front cam and the Samsung branding.

On the bottom front, it has got the two touch capacitive buttons and one physical home button. The touch capacitive buttons doesn’t light up.

On the back, it has got a 8MP camera, a flash, a speaker and a Samsung branding.

On the top, there is a 3.5mm jack and a micro-USB port for charging and Data syncing.

On the left side there is SIM card slot and a micro-SD card slot

On the right side, there’s a Volume up and down button and a Power button.

Display

It has got a 7-inch HD resolution LCD IPS display with a pixel density of 216 pixels per inch. The display is good, bright and vibrant. The display on this device is good in terms of color reproduction but lacks in terms of sharpness. It has got a 69.9% screen-to-body ratio. For a tablet, it has got a decent display and you won’t see major pixelation while using it.

Camera Overview

It sports a 8MP camera on the rear and a 2MP camera on the front and both cameras can shoot videos at 720p with 30 FPS. This is just a below average camera setup but performs decent considering it’s a tablet camera. Both cameras are good for natural lighting conditions and you cannot expect much if you have need a good camera.

Gaming Performance

Well this device performs average when it comes to gaming. The basic and the mid-level games ran just fine without any issue. But when we tested it with some heavy games, it struggled at high graphic setting, it skipped lot of frames and lagged a lot. Though they were playable with low or medium setting. GTA San Andreas was playable at medium setting but controls lagged a bit.

Heating was normal for a specific time but it got increased after few minutes but nothing major.

Benchmark Scores

Conclusion

The Samsung Galaxy J Max is a good value for money device at INR 13,400. It doesn’t have anything that makes it stand out of the crowd other than its size. The display, the build, the overall specification is good enough considering its a tablet. The one downside of this device is that it still runs on Lollipop knowing that Marshmallow has already been out. Overall it’s a decent tablet and people who are looking for a dependable tablet with decent specification, will find this tablet quite suitable for them.

Clear Fit Wimax To Intel Core Notebooks At Best Buy

Clearwire has announced that it plans to slot WiMAX modems into all the Intel Core based notebooks at Best Buy by the holidays, in an attempt to drum up business for their 4G network.  It’s unclear what affect the 4G modems will have on the price – systems tipped to be included in the promotion are the Dell Inspiron 14, Dell Inspiron 15, Dell Mini 10, and Toshiba Satellite M645, among others – but if buyers opt for a two-year CLEAR agreement they’ll get a $100 rebate.

Clearwire’s choice of Core-based machines is unsurprising, given that Intel has invested heavily in WiMAX technology.  CLEAR plans start at $40 per month and offer uncapped, true-unlimited data though of course only in areas where Clearwire has network coverage.  The company recently outed a range of USB modems and MiFi-style wireless 4G hotspots for those not willing to limit their WiMAX to a single machine.

Press Release:

CLEAR(R) 4G Mobile Broadband Service Now Available with Specially Discounted Embedded 4G Devices Nationwide via Best Buy

Broader Assortment of Embedded 4G WiMAX Laptops and Netbooks Available Starting this Summer for Back to School

All Laptops Based on Intel(R) Core(TM) Processors to Have 4G WiMAX Built-in Across All Best Buy Stores Nationwide by Holiday

Expanded Devices Line-Up and Discounted Equipment Pricing Offer Consumers Greater Access to Unlimited Data with CLEAR(R) 4G Service

KIRKLAND, Wash., Jun 21, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) –Clearwire Corporation (NASDAQ: CLWR), a leading provider of wireless broadband services, today announced the nationwide expansion of embedded 4G mobile broadband laptops in all Best Buy locations and at chúng tôi Starting today, consumers will have access to expanded choices and discounted equipment offers on Intel-based, embedded WiMAX laptops with access to CLEAR(R) 4G super fast mobile Internet service.

Just in time for summer, consumers across the country can future-proof their laptops based on Intel(R) Core(TM) processor-based from Best Buy with built-in 4G capability, enabling the devices to easily connect to CLEAR’s super fast mobile Internet service. Whether streaming videos at the beach or downloading vacation footage from the backseat of a minivan, users can experience true mobile broadband connectivity in CLEAR coverage areas. Customers can choose between several devices, including the Dell Inspiron 14, Dell Inspiron 15, Dell Mini 10, and Toshiba Satellite M645. Availability will vary by location.

CLEAR offers unlimited usage, unlike service plans from traditional wireless carriers which cap the amount of data a customer can use. CLEAR’s mobile Internet plans start at $40 per month. Bundled service options for home access can offer additional savings. Qualifying embedded 4G mobile broadband devices from Best Buy are eligible for a $100 discount when customers sign up for CLEAR service with a two-year service agreement.

“Embedding 4G technology into laptops and netbooks makes it easy for consumers to experience CLEAR’s super fast mobile Internet service on the latest devices,” said Mike Sievert, chief commercial officer for Clearwire. “The discounted summer and holiday pricing on CLEAR-ready laptops from Intel and available through Best Buy is another way Clearwire is working to meet the rapidly growing demand for true mobile broadband services in the U.S.”

“The program from Best Buy to expand the availability of fully embedded, seamlessly integrated WiMAX on laptops based on Intel(R) Core(TM) processors will make it even easier for consumers across the country to enjoy the enhanced performance of Clear’s 4G mobile broadband network,” said Erik Reid, director, Mobile Product Group at Intel. “During the back to school and holiday shopping seasons, Intel, along with Best Buy and Clearwire will continue to make an unprecedented number of embedded WiMAX laptops and netbooks available from all major PC OEMs.”

As Its Ice Sheet Melts, Greenland Is Rising Faster Than Expected

If the Earth’s crust had a theme song, it would probably be Chumbawamba’s ’90’s classic “Tubthumping”.

Allow me to explain.

In a paper published today in Science Advances, researchers led by Shfaqat A. Khan from the Technical University of Denmark found that we might have been underestimating Greenland’s ability to bounce back after thousands of years of glacial oppression, which is very bad news for estimates of sea level rise.

So first some background: the Earth’s interior has a mostly solid core at the center, a mantle that is made up of flexible heated rock and a very very thin layer (five to 30 miles thick) of solid rock at the edges of the planet. That crusty outer layer is called the Earth’s crust. During cold periods in the Earth’s history, ice starts building up on land. In large amounts, this ice becomes glaciers and ice sheets, building up into vast masses thousands of feet thick. Greenland and Antarctica have the last two significant ice sheets on Earth. With that much of a load on top of it, the crust sinks into the mantle. But when the ice melts away or gets thinner during warmer periods, the crust starts to bounce back, a process called postglacial rebound.

In other words, it gets pressed down, but it gets up again, and we’re never going to keep it down.

New GPS measurements reported in the paper found that in some areas (where the mantle might be a little springier), Greenland’s underlying land mass was rising by nearly half an inch (12 mm) every year as ice is removed. That’s a big deal because many measurements of the thickness of the Greenland Ice Sheet are based on researchers measuring the elevation of the surface of the ice. The reasoning is if the ice is taller than it was last time measurements were taken, then the ice sheet is growing. If it’s shorter, than the ice sheet is shrinking. And by taking many different measurements across Greenland, researchers can build up a picture of how much ice is being lost over time. These calculations do take postglacial rebound into account, but the new research suggests that Greenland is bouncing back faster then previous studies had accounted for.

That means that Greenland may have lost much more ice than we’d thought. The study suggests that instead of Greenland’s melting ice contributing 10.5 feet (3.2 m) to sea level rise over the past 20,000 years, the Greenland Ice Sheet has contributed around 15.1 feet (4.6 m) to sea level rise. (To put those 20,000 years in perspective see this xkcd comic for a visual of how climate has changed since then.)

Greenland is still a very icy place, and contains a lot of ice that could raise sea levels much further if they continue to melt at an accelerated rate. Researchers hope that with these new, more accurate measurements they can get a more accurate picture of how Greenland is contributing to sea level rise, helping people living in coastal cities prepare for a wetter future.

Glacier in Greenland

A glacier makes its way down a mountain in Greenland.

Into the Abyss

A helicopter and researchers help provide a much needed size perspective on the massive sheet of ice.

Sarqardliup glacier

The Sarqardliup glacier in west Greenland where it flows into the sea.

Supraglacial lake

A supraglacial lake is a lake that sits on top of a glacier. Though massive, cracks that form under the surface can drain them in a matter of hours.

Meltwater

Meltwater flowing into the oceans from the Greenland Ice Sheet can contribute to sea level rise.

Update the detailed information about Intel Alder Lake Core I9 Benchmarks Faster Than M1 Max, With Major Caveats on the Moimoishop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!