Trending March 2024 # Netgear A6200 Review: A Cost # Suggested April 2024 # Top 8 Popular

You are reading the article Netgear A6200 Review: A Cost updated in March 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Netgear A6200 Review: A Cost

If you need to connect just a single client, such as a laptop or a home-theater PC, to your 802.11ac network, a Wi-Fi client USB adapter is much cheaper than a wireless bridge. Netgear’s A6200 is one of the best.

If you need to connect several wired clients to your 802.11ac network, you should set up a wireless bridge. If you have just one client—especially a laptop, or maybe a home-theater PC—Netgear offers a better, cheaper alternative: Plug its A6200 USB Wi-Fi adapter into your PC and establish a wireless connection that’s fast enough to stream Blu-ray-quality video.

The A6200 is a dual-band adapter capable of operating on both the 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency bands (as an 802.11n device and an 802.11ac device, respectively). We tested both scenarios, comparing its 802.11n performance with that of the Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 Wi-Fi adapter integrated into our AVADirect gaming laptop, and its 802.11ac performance with that of Cisco’s Linksys WUMC710 wireless bridge.

Being a USB adapter, the A6200 draws the power it needs from the computer, whereas the WUMC710 requires AC power. Netgear’s device, however, can transmit and receive only two 802.11ac spatial streams (900 mbps aggregate), whereas Cisco’s supports three (1.3 gbps aggregate). Bear in mind that those theoretical maximum speeds are nothing close to what you’ll get in the real world, and that the USB 2.0 interface the A6200 uses maxes out at 480 mbps anyway (the Cisco product’s physical connection to its clients is either 10/100 ethernet or gigabit ethernet).

In any event, in our tests the A6200 delivered considerably less throughput than the WUMC710 did, particularly at close range (with the client in the same room as the router, separated by 9 feet). Nonetheless, the A6200 provided more than enough bandwidth to stream Blu-ray-quality video from a home server to the client regardless of distance: 221 mbps at 9 feet, 154 mbps at 35 feet, and 152 mbps at 65 feet. (We used SlySoft’s AnyDVD HD to rip the movie Spider-Man 3 from a Blu-ray Disc and saved it as an ISO image on the server. We then used SlySoft’s Virtual CloneDrive to mount the ISO image on our laptop and streamed it over the network via CyberLink’s PowerDVD 12 Ultra).

Although Netgear’s A6200 USB adapter delivered considerably less throughput than Cisco’s WUMC710 did, it was plenty fast enough to stream HD video over our 802.11ac wireless network.

The A6200 is also a good 802.11n network adapter operating on the 2.4GHz frequency band. Here again, the A6200 supports only two spatial streams (300 mbps aggregate), whereas the Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 built into our test laptop supports three (450 mbps aggregate). Intel’s adapter stomped the A6200 at close range (with signal oversaturation being the likely culprit), but Netgear’s device pulled out wins when the client was in a home theater 35 feet away from the router and in a home office 65 feet from the router. Those results are likely due to the fact that the Netgear’s two antennas were outside the laptop’s enclosure, while the Intel product’s antennas were tucked inside it.

The A6200 is also a capable 802.11n Wi-Fi adapter, delivering good performance at long range.

Speaking of antennas, the A6200’s USB connector can pivot from 180 degrees to 90 degrees, and its antenna can rotate from a negative 180 degrees to a positive 180 degrees (this flexibility adds 1 inch to the adapter’s length, which could increase its range depending on the router’s location and the antenna orientation). Netgear also provides a USB stand with a 3-foot cable that gives you many more options when it comes to placing the adapter. Netgear recommends using the stand, and that’s how we tested the adapter.

If you’re running an 802.11ac Draft 2.0 router, you have a laptop, and you want the fastest possible wireless connection to your network, Netgear’s A6200 is a no-brainer. It’s also a great choice if you’re looking to connect just one wireless PC to your 802.11ac network, because it’s far less expensive than an 802.11ac wireless bridge that has three additional ethernet ports you don’t need. If you are looking to connect several clients to your network, and they’re all in the same spot, the bridge remains the better option.

You're reading Netgear A6200 Review: A Cost

Fixed Cost Vs Variable Cost

Difference between Fixed Cost vs Variable Cost

The following article provides an outline for Fixed cost vs Variable cost. The major difference between these two costs is that the Variable depends on the output of production while the fixed cost is independent of the output.

Start Your Free Investment Banking Course

Download Corporate Valuation, Investment Banking, Accounting, CFA Calculator & others

What is Fixed Cost?

Fixed cost is defined as a cost that does not change its value with any change (Increase or Decrease) in the goods produced or services sold. Changes in activity levels do not affect fixed costs. It does not mean that the cost will remain fixed forever. It means it will be constant for a particular period of time. E.g., The interest amount charged is fixed for the period unless and until it has been renewed. Fixed cost and variable cost are the main two pillars in any industry’s production and service line. There are two types of fixed costs: Committed fixed cost and discretionary fixed cost. The fixed cost can be considered as a sunk cost.

What is Variable Cost?

=Rs 500) (5*200=Rs 1000) (5*300=Rs 1500).

Head to Head Comparison Between Fixed Cost vs Variable Cost (Infographics)

Below are the top 8 differences between Fixed cost and Variable Cost:

Key Differences between Fixed Cost vs Variable Cost

Examples of variable costs are Raw materials, labor, packaging, freight, and commission. As the volume increases, these costs will increase as one extra item to be produced requires more materials, labor, etc. Hence these costs are directly proportional to the volume of items produced.

Examples of fixed costs are rental payments, depreciation, insurance, interest payment, etc. These items do not change even if you increase the volume of production, e.g., even if you produce one extra item, the rental payment needs to do is the same So, Fixed cost.

Variable cost varies with the variation in the volume production. The fixed cost has no relation with the output capacity.

Fixed cost does not change with the volume and remains constant for a given period of time. e.g. Till the time new lease contract is not changed, the lease payment will remain fixed. Variable cost changes with the production volume.

Example of calculating the fixed cost: Supposes the total cost is Rs1000 and the total units produced are 10. Therefore, the fixed cost per unit is Rs1000/10 = Rs100. The variable cost of labor charges is 5Rs per unit of production. Therefore, for making 10 units, it would be 10*5=Rs50. The total cost of production is the sum of the total variable cost and total fixed cost.

Here the only taken variable is labor. We need to consider the variable cost for all the other items and add to the fixed cost to get the total cost as an outcome. fixed cost changes per unit. As the number of units increases, the fixed cost per unit decreases. Variable cost remains constant per unit. Variable cost is directly proportional to the change in production.

If production increases, i.e., if the number of units produced increases, the fixed cost per unit produced drops significantly, increasing the possibility of a greater profit margin and achieving economies of scale.

As mentioned above, the economies of scale production need to be increased to decrease the per-unit fixed cost. So, the risk associated with the fixed cost is higher than the variable cost.

Unless and until production takes place, variable cost does not take place, but fixed cost occurs even if there is no production. For e.g. Even if there is no laptop produced in the laptop factory but the rental charges need to be paid – that is the fixed cost. The labor charges are not paid as no production – that is the variable cost. The fixed cost cannot be controlled and has to be paid. The amount of the production level can control the variable cost.

Comparison Table between Fixed Cost vs Variable Cost

Let’s discuss the top comparison between Fixed Cost vs Variable Cost:

Basis of Comparison Fixed Cost Variable Cost

Definition The cost is fixed. Cost is variable.

Dependent Independent on the volume of production of a company. Dependent on the volume of production of a company.

Behavior Remains constant for a given time. Time-related. Changes with the output level. Volume-related.

Formula It is calculated as the total fixed cost divided by no of units produced. Formula to calculate the total variable cost is (variable cost of one item*no of items produced).

Economies of scale Greater the fixed cost company has more sales the company targets to reach the breakeven point. Variable cost remains flat in nature.

Risk associated It is riskier as the cost depends on the production level. Risk varies as the cost is dependent on the amount produced.

Occurred when These costs occur even if the quantity is produced or not. It cannot be controlled. These costs occur only when the production starts depending directly on the no of units produced. It could be controlled.

Examples Salary, tax, depreciation, insurance, etc. Cost of goods sold, administrative and general expenses on the Income statement.


Variable and fixed costs are completely contradictory to each other but serve a major role in financial analysis. Higher units of production increase profitability as the total fixed cost decreases, while variable cost helps in the contribution margin; therefore, both have unique importance in their ways.

Recommended Articles

This is a guide to Fixed cost vs Variable cost. Here we discussed the Fixed vs Variable cost key differences with infographics and a comparison table. You can also go through our other suggested articles to learn more –

Hp Separation To Cost $1.3 Billion In 2024

Breaking up is hard to do, and in Hewlett-Packard’s (HP) case, somewhat costly too. HP announced its first quarter fiscal 2024 financial results this week, sharing details on its announced strategy to separate into two companies. When the separation is complete HP Enterprise will focus on enterprise software, hardware and services while HP Inc will handle the consumer side of the business.

For the first quarter of fiscal 2024, HP reported revenue of $26.8 billion for a five percent year-over-year decline. Looking at specific segments within HP, software revenue was down by five percent, business critical systems revenue declined by nine percent while industry standard server revenue grew by seven percent.

“We saw improved performance in business critical systems and our new products are gaining traction with customers,” HP CEO Meg Whitman said during her company’s earning call. “During the quarter, we expanded our server portfolio with HP Integrity Superdome X and HP Integrity NonStop X.”

HP’s Helion cloud business was also highlighted by Whitman as being a growth point. In particular Whitman detailed a new 10 year multi-billion dollar cloud win with Deutsche Bank. HP has not yet publicly disclosed the specific dollar amount for the deal. Whitman noted that the Deutsche Bank win was a deal that took nearly two years to come to fruition.

“We’re very proud of the Deutsche Bank win and it was a full on HP effort including our enterprise group, our software business, our cloud business as well as our services business and it was a services led win,” Whitman said. “I believe the reason that we won is we had the best technical solution for what Deutsche Bank needed, which was to reduce cost, reduce cost significantly by the way increase agility and migrate to a new world order of DevOps and a cloud-based environment.”

HP Separation

On October 6, 2014, HP first announced its intention to separate into two companies. Whitman said that in her view HP is making real progress on the separation,so far.

“Recall that we are separating into two Fortune 50 companies, I mean it’s sort of hard to imagine that there are two Fortune 50 companies embedded in HP,” Whitman said. “That has included an entire organizational design and selection process the IT strategy carve out financials and many other activities.”

HP’s CFO Cathie Lesjak noted that the scale of the HP separation is unprecedented in its size and complexity. It’s a breakup that will also have many costs.

“Over the past few months we designed and quantified the expected charges related to the separation,” Lesjak said. “These charges include finance, IT, consulting and legal fees, real estate and other items that are incremental and one-time in nature and not reflective of our operational performance.”

Lesjak said that for the full fiscal 2024 year HP now expect costs associated with separation to be $1.3 billion. In fiscal 2024, there is an additional $500 million in cost that HP is now expecting as well.

“While these are large numbers, they represent less than two percent of our annual operating cost and are necessary to realize the potential of the separation into two world class companies,” Lesjak said.

Sean Michael Kerner is a senior editor at Datamation and chúng tôi Follow him on Twitter @TechJournalist ##

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock.

Cost Of Post 9/11 Wars: $4.6 Trillion

Cost of Post 9/11 Wars: $4.6 Trillion Bill for each taxpayer is $23,386

Neta C. Crawford, a BU College of Arts & Sciences professor of political science, codirects the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. She includes the costs of healthcare and disability compensation in her accounting. Photo by Cydney Scott

How do you count the costs of war?

In the Pentagon’s most recent accounting, the total authorized US spending on the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria between fiscal years 2001 and 2023 is $1.52 trillion. The bill for each individual taxpayer amounts to $7,740, according to the Pentagon.

That sounds like a lot of taxpayer money.

But Neta C. Crawford, codirector of the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, says the true cost is higher—about three times higher. Crawford, a Boston University College of Arts & Sciences professor of political science, calculates the total price tag of the post-9/11 wars at $4.6 trillion, with the bill for each individual taxpayer totaling $23,386. The numbers come from Crawford’s latest Costs of War report, released in November 2023.

The Costs of War Project has a team of some 40 scholars, legal experts, human rights practitioners, and physicians that documents the economic, political, and human toll of the post-9/11 wars and related violence in the so-called war on terror.

Speaking at a Congressional briefing by US Senator Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, Crawford said that while the Pentagon’s numbers focus on “direct war spending” by the Defense and State Departments, her calculations also include war-caused and war-related spending by the Pentagon, the State Department, the Veterans Affairs Department (VA), and Homeland Security. That spending includes the VA’s healthcare costs for about two million soldiers and disability compensation for another million soldiers.

Crawford, an expert on the ethics of war and international relations theory, said her accounting also includes the paid interest on the money the United States has borrowed for the wars. “This is not a pay-as-you-go war,” she said at the briefing. “It is rather more like taking out a home equity line of credit.”

BU Research talked with Crawford about how she became involved with the Costs of War Project, why she thinks it’s important to talk about the costs of war, and how one Vietnam veteran’s broken life got her interested in the subject.

BU Research: What do you mean when you say the costs of war don’t end when the wars end?

Crawford: Project contributor Linda Bilmes, Daniel Patrick Moynihan Senior Lecturer in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, says these wars have been paid for with a credit card. It’s like getting a mortgage. We’ve moved in, we’ve moved out, and we’ve given the debt to our kids.

There are two million men and women who’ve served and once they leave the service they become eligible for medical care and disability through the VA. An unfortunate fact of these wars in Afghanistan and Syria is that many of these veterans are sicker than in past wars. That’s partly because of exposure and just mistakes that were made. Remember those open burn pits they used to get rid of waste at military sites in Iraq and Afghanistan? Those caused respiratory illnesses. Some of it is also the very dusty environment soldiers are operating in. Often they’re carrying very heavy packs, which can cause injuries to their musculature. Deployments in the military are longer now, and people have served multiple deployments.

As a result, health insurance costs have gone up for people after duty and for veterans. Over the long term, there is the care of these veterans, who have higher rates of heart disease and lung problems, not to mention the more than 1,600 people who have lost limbs. Medical and disability costs for those people are going to peak in about 40 years. So I have an estimate that’s perhaps low for the cost of healthcare over the next 40 years.

Can you tell us more about the VA’s portion of the costs of war?

Just last year 80,000 more veterans entered the queue for disability compensation. The VA is serving about a million people for disability. The costs for those people will go up as they get older. I’m not even talking about the spiritual pain and distress for families.

What are some of the other unknowns?

We don’t know how long the wars will last. We don’t know how many veterans will be entering the system who have been serving in these wars. We don’t know the ultimate cost. I try to be conservative with my numbers.

What do you and the other Costs of War scholars hope to accomplish with these annual reports?

Our aim is to help people understand what we’ve been doing in these wars. If we can get a handle on the costs, then we can talk about the risks and benefits. Then we can have an informed public policy discussion. We also need to understand whether we’ve prevented incidents or whether it’s a wash or whether what we’ve been doing is counterproductive in the war zone.

I think it’s the job of academics and people in Congress to have these discussions. We’re trying to create the space to have an informed conversation, one that’s not driven by fear, but by evidence. Many people don’t know how to talk about war and to question what we’re doing for the last 16 years, because they’re afraid of seeming as if they don’t support the troops.

Everyone will say we want to give these men and women what they need do their jobs. But we also need to question the job: how well is it going? Are we achieving our policy objectives? You have to recognize that these objectives are moving goal posts and the metrics for success are elusive.

The second thing I think we need to question is whether there is no other way to achieve the objective of security. If the idea is that you want to prevent future terrorist attacks, are there other means besides killing as many potential or actual militant terrorists as there are over there? Can we not think about how to reduce the cause for people to become terrorists?

Since imperial Rome, you said at the briefing, great powers have “almost always believed that their wars would be short, effective, and inexpensive compared to the gains.” Does that apply to these wars?

The American people have been told that these wars would be short, low in cost in terms of lives, and low in cost in terms of funding, that the war in Iraq might even pay for itself. We were told that we’d leave the place better than it was when we came. That’s always the case when you enter wars. You have these optimistic assessments and estimates and promises about the duration, the likelihood of success, and the costs of conflict. Generally, they’re proven to be overly optimistic. We’re trying to point out that this is a pattern.

How did you get interested in the costs of war in the first place?

I’ve been working on research related to war for decades. I grew up in Milwaukee. My father was a public school teacher. He had a side job, renovating houses to sell or rent. He believed in a strong work ethic, and I was helping him by the time I was 9 or 10. I worked alongside a man named Calvin, who was a Vietnam veteran. My father said Calvin was not the same person when he came back from the war. I kept track of Calvin through my father. He was not mentally stable. He was a kind, gentle person, but he was broken by his experiences in Vietnam. The contact with Calvin was formative for me.

The moral injury, the psychic harm, the fear of terrorism people have been living with for a long time—those are all things we can’t quantify.

Explore Related Topics:

Unclutter Mac App Review: A 3

Unclutter is a 3-in-1 file, notes, and clipboard manager for Mac. But why would you need or want something like this? Well, let me ask you a question before anything else; which of the two desktop view will you prefer while working?

While there might be a few who love and strive in chaos, most users prefer an organized, minimal desktop view as it helps to be more productive, creative, and focused. Unclutter claims that it could help users maintain a clutter-free desktop while maintaining easy access to the tools they need.

And as I review the Unclutter app, these high claims are put to the test. Did they pass? Is the app actually a time/energy saver? Should you grab it or pass? Well, why don’t you scroll down and see it for yourself!

How does the Unclutter app for Mac work?

Unclutter smartly incorporates three utilities – notetaking, files, and clipboard, on a single dashboard.

Thanks to it, you can take notes quickly, easily access files from a special drop zone, and track your clipboard, making copying and pasting a breeze.

What’s great?

These united panels do not take any significant real-estate on your desktop. In fact, they are hidden when not in use, quite like the Dock (if that setting is enabled). All you have to do is move your cursor to the very top of the screen (Check this GIF to see how it works), and voila! The panel will present itself.

Plus, if you only want all or one of them, that can be done as well. Just grab and pull down the panel on the desktop.

Remarkably, the pulled down panels always stay on top. So, whether you are making notes from a YouTube video or working on a split-screen like me, it comes in handy.

To further understand why and how these features are useful, let’s look at them individually.

 A quick notetaker

Imagine the Unclutter Notes as sticky notes. It lets you write quick excerpts, to-do lists, reminders, or full-length articles if you will. Just move your mouse upward, call upon unclutter, tap plus, and start writing.

A smart file management system

So, why do you need so many files or folders on your desktop? Because you want easy & quick access. Well, that’s precisely how the Unclutter files section works. Simply drag and drop your files here and access them without missing a beat.

This section gives you full freedom, how you want to see the files – list or icons, how you want to arrange the files, and what icon item size you prefer. Remarkably, you can even store folder/file shortcuts on the panel using Command+Option keys while dragging a file.

A handy clipboard

Despite being part of a multi-utility app, Unclutter clipboard is par with some of Mac’s best clipboard management apps. Scroll through the recent clips and recall/paste them as and when needed. Notably, unless you clear the history, it is retained even after a reboot.

You can even start a text and place them in the Favorite section for future use. What I particularly love is that you can edit the clips before pasting them. Imagine you have a default mail format stored in favorites, edit it as per need, and send the mail quicker.

And that’s not all; the settings section has some more gems! You can enable up to 50 clips in the clipboard history and restrict the app from copying sensitive data from one or more apps. Now, that’s a privacy feature even Apple would applaud.

What’s so special about the Unclutter app

When files & data are well-organized, you can easily find them, saving both time and energy. This hassle-free scenario, in turn, helps you concentrate better on the task at hand and improves your overall performance and productivity.

And instead of using a separate file manager, clipboard, and notetaking app to keep things manageable and sorted, Unclutter offers all three services in one hideable window.

Incredibly, you even have options for dark/light themes, which panels to keep or remove, and which action should pull up the Unclutter panel.

Should you say yes to Unclutter?

For an app that is named Unclutter, this one boasts a quite sorted mix of fantastic features. As mentioned above, many thoughtful and helpful knick-knacks are incorporated into the app so that each panel, Notes, Clipboard, and Files are comprehensive in themselves.

I won’t claim that you will never need another file or notetaking app ever. But it could surely reduce your dependency on such an app while making things way quicker. After all, you just have to move the cursor to the top, and voila! You have access to three apps at once.

Unclutter is undoubtedly worth your time, effort, and money! To access a free trial for the app, visit Unclutter’s website.

Author Profile


A self-professed Geek who loves to explore all things Apple. I thoroughly enjoy discovering new hacks, troubleshooting issues, and finding and reviewing the best products and apps currently available. My expertise also includes curating opinionated and honest editorials. If not this, you might find me surfing the web or listening to audiobooks.

Review: Rapidx Myport Is A Neat All

Back in August, we saw the OtterSpot, a wireless charging pad system that offered both tabletop and portable charging. The RapidX MyPort is the same idea, but with a charging stand design rather than a flat pad.

Both devices aim to be the only wireless charger you’ll ever need, providing outlet-powered charging at home and power-bank charging on the move…

The strength of the OtterSpot is the ability to stack the charging pucks to charge more than one at a time.

RapidX MyPort look and feel

The MyPort looks very similar to any other wireless charging stand. It’s black plastic, with a semi-rubberized surface. It has a USB-C port in the back, and comes with a USB-C to USB-A cable – but not a charging brick. There’s a white indicator light on the front to show when it’s powered up.

So far, so standard.

The first sign that this is not a normal charging stand is the indicator lights on the side of the sloped support. Four LEDs indicate the charge status of the power-bank, in 25% increments, while a fifth LED at the top indicates the charging status of the phone or bank. Green indicates ready to charge, blue shows that it is charging.

Lift the back from the dock, and you have a portable power-bank. On the bottom are four contact points to charge the unit in the base, and two USB ports, one USB-A, one USB-C.

In use – at home

When using it at home, it’s exactly like any other charging stand. Leave it connected, and just put your phone on the stand to charge. The outlet charges both the power-bank and your phone.

Sensibly, the RapidX MyPort prioritizes your phone. When it’s not 100% charged, it directs all the available power to the phone. Only when your phone is fully charged does it then switch to charging the power-bank.

In practice, however, the bank will almost always be fully-powered as it charges when your phone is not on the stand.

I did find two drawbacks. First, the branding on the power-bank is more prominent than I would like. I prefer branding to be discreet, as it is on the Choetech charging stands I use as standard. Although the Choetech brand name looks prominent in product shots, it’s actually very faded and subtle in appearance. The RapidX branding and logo is also somewhat faded but stands out more than I would ideally like – especially as the writing is sideways when used as a stand.

Second, the wireless charging range. I use a Mujjo wallet case (older review here, iPhone 11 Pro review to follow) with two cards in the back. With my Choetech stands, my iPhone charges quite happily through the case and cards, but with the MyPort, it is rather sensitive to the placement of the cards. Sometimes it charges happily through them, sometimes it doesn’t. With one card, it’s fine.

In use – mobile

For mobile use, you have two options: wired or wireless charging. As mentioned, you get two ports, USB-A and USB-C, and can use either one or both together to charge two different devices.

As someone who just bit the bullet and swapped all my USB-A cables for USB-C ones, I’d have preferred two USB-C ports, but this is the more flexible arrangement. Both USB ports support 18W fast-charging.

But the selling point, of course, is that you get wireless charging on the move as well as at home. I found that both a jacket pocket and the phone sleeve of a bag were large enough to accommodate both power-bank and phone – and kept them tightly enough together for wireless charging.

This makes it a fantastically convenient system. At home, charge normally in the stand. When you leave, either pick up just your phone on its own or – if you need more power to see you through the day – take the bank and phone together and slide them into your pocket or bag sleeve to keep the phone charged.

Alternatively, if you’re going to be based mainly in one place while away from home, keep the power-bank separate, and then just put it on your coffee shop table or wherever and place your phone on top to keep it charged.

The MyPort powers down when you remove it from the dock: just press the power button once to switch it on, and long-press it to switch it off.

In wireless charging mode, the device supports 5W, 7.5W, and 10W charging. The iPhone 11 supports 7.5W.

Finally, the USB-C port also supports two-way power delivery, so you also have the option of charging it from a MacBook, which is a convenient coffee-shop option to keep both bank and phone charged.

RapidX MyPort pricing and conclusions

The RapidX MyPort costs $79.99. You can get a wired 10,000mAh power-bank for less than half that price. Add in a wireless charging stand, and you’re still well below eighty bucks.

So MyPort only makes sense if you want both a wireless charging stand and a power-bank, and you’re willing to pay a premium for the wireless charging capability and/or the convenience of an all-in-one solution.

But it’s a very neat setup which is completely painless to use, and for that, I personally think it’s worth the money for anyone whose iPhone regularly struggles to make it through the day on one charge.

The RapidX MyPort is available direct from the RapidX website, priced at $79.99.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Update the detailed information about Netgear A6200 Review: A Cost on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!