You are reading the article Opinion: Final Thoughts After Migrating From Apple Music To Spotify updated in December 2023 on the website Moimoishop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Opinion: Final Thoughts After Migrating From Apple Music To Spotify
In April, I decided to give Spotify a try over Apple Music. As an Apple Music subscriber since day one, I always wondered how it was using Apple’s most important competitor in the music streaming war. After almost a month, I finally decided whether I’m going to stay as a Spotify subscriber or switch back to Apple Music.
To avoid rehashing what I’ve written in the past, here are some links to my previous coverage on the comparison between Apple Music and Spotify.
Without further ado, I’m moving back to Apple Music, here’s why:Apple One, Apple Watch app, and music library
Three things will keep me using Apple Music over Spotify and, for me, they are a pretty big deal.
Starting with Apple One, I think is more convenient to pay one subscription for a lot of services rather than paying only Spotify for one service. With the Apple One Family plan, I have 200GB of iCloud storage, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, and Apple Music, and I can share all of these services with my family. For $19.95 a month, I have way more benefits instead of paying $9.99 per month for Spotify individual plan or $16.99 for a family subscription that only includes the music service.
Another big deal is the Apple Watch app. I’m used to exercising without my iPhone nearby and the Apple Music app is way more useful. I can easily select my playlists and search among all the artists, albums, and songs that I have. I can even download playlists and albums for offline listening, which is currently unavailable on the Spotify Apple Watch app.
I also found the Spotify app a bit clunky. After two years without offering an Apple Watch app, Spotify still needs to make some improvements over its recently-launch app.
Finally, during this month, I really missed the ability to check my library with all my songs. Rather than just choosing a playlist, or album, or an artist, I just love having all my downloaded songs in one place. I also noticed how weird is the fact that I can’t download/add a single song on Spotify. I have to add or download the entire album. Can I just enjoy one song? Do I have to like all of them?Spotify: The good, the bad, and what I’ll miss the most
Now I have to go back and talk about Spotify. It is indeed a really great service and anyone who is already subscribed to it is for sure happy. The thing I enjoyed the most about using Spotify was its macOS app.
I don’t listen to a lot of songs with the Music app on the Mac but with Spotify I did. It’s an easy interface to use, I can check what my friends are listening to, and I just enjoyed it a lot. In fact, this is the place where I listen to music the most.
I’ll also miss the playlists created by artists. I know Apple Music has the same feature, but Spotify gives you additional ways to connect with artists and learn about their favorite songs and inspirations.
One thing that I didn’t appreciate about Spotify, apart from the lack of a proper library with my songs, is how much it wants me to try its playlists. Over my one month with Spotify, I felt like I was listening less to the things I already like because of Spotify’s emphasis on discovering new music.
And every time I listened to a different artist, Spotify tried hard to give me a playlist with the band and another one hundred similar artists. Again, this meant that I started listening less and less to albums and songs I already enjoyed and stayed on a loop with the same three to four everyday artists.
Two other things I felt were missing from Apple Music were a private listening mode and collaborative playlists. I always complained about Apple Music was the lack of a private listening option and creating playlists with my friends. It may have been related to the pandemic and not going out, but I actually didn’t use either of these features.
In a way, it feels like Memoji or the Slofie thing Apple promoted a few years back: it’s good to know they exist, you may try them once or twice, but with time you just forget about them. Of course, I’d be happy if Apple Music implemented these features, but now I know they’re not as important as I initially thought.
Also, I don’t think is a great idea to combo music and podcasts in the same area. I don’t know if anyone ever created a playlist with Taylor Swift songs and Office Ladies podcast episodes. It just feels weird. What about if I don’t like podcasts at all? Do I have to receive all these recommendations every day?Wrap-up
Again, I enjoyed using Spotify a lot and I think the HiFi subscription tier is going to be a great addition to the service – I hope Apple Music follows the same path. I also found it was funny how different I experience music with distinct services.
Apple Music feels more personal while Spotify seems like “Here’s what everybody is listening to, you should try it too.”
In the long term, there’s not a right or wrong answer about what is the best music streaming service. You have to think about the devices you use to listen to music, how much are you willing to pay, and how you like to experience music.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You're reading Opinion: Final Thoughts After Migrating From Apple Music To Spotify
Migrating from a SQL to a NoSQL database is a significant undertaking that requires careful planning and strategizing. It’s important to understand the differences between these two types of databases and to identify the specific use cases for which you will be using the NoSQL database. There are several different tools and techniques available for migrating data from a SQL to a NoSQL database, and it’s important to carefully evaluate the pros and cons of each option to determine the best fit for your needs.
Migrating from a SQL to a NoSQL database can be a significant undertaking and it’s important to plan and strategize carefully to ensure a smooth and successful migration.Definition
Strategies for migrating from a SQL to a NoSQL database refer to the plans and approaches used to move data and applications from a SQL database to a NoSQL database. These strategies typically involve identifying the specific use cases for which the NoSQL database will be used, evaluating the various data migration options available, testing and validating the migrated data, and planning for ongoing maintenance and updates. The goal of these strategies is to ensure a smooth and successful migration to the NoSQL database, while minimizing disruption to the application and maximizing the benefits of the new database.Here are some General Strategies
Understand the differences between SQL and NoSQL databases − It’s important to understand the differences between SQL and NoSQL databases in order to make an informed decision about which type of database is best suited for your needs. NoSQL databases are generally better suited for handling large amounts of unstructured data, while SQL databases are better suited for structured data with complex relationships.
Identify the use cases for the NoSQL database − Determine the specific use cases for which you will be using the NoSQL database. This will help you select the appropriate NoSQL database and design the schema in a way that is optimized for your use cases.
Evaluate the data migration options − There are several different approaches to migrating data from a SQL to a NoSQL database, including writing custom scripts, using ETL tools, or using a managed service. Evaluate the pros and cons of each approach to determine the best fit for your needs.
Test and validate the migrated data − It’s important to thoroughly test and validate the migrated data to ensure that it has been migrated accurately and that the NoSQL database is functioning correctly.
Monitor and optimize performance − After the migration is complete, continue to monitor and optimize the performance of the NoSQL database to ensure that it meets the needs of your application.
Plan for ongoing maintenance and updates − Migrating to a NoSQL database is not a one-time event – it requires ongoing maintenance and updates to ensure that it continues to meet the needs of your application. Plan for these ongoing efforts as part of your overall migration strategy.Important Factors While Migrating from SQL to NoSQL
There are several important factors to consider when migrating from a SQL database to a NoSQL database −
Data model − NoSQL databases have different data models than SQL databases, so you will need to determine how to structure your data in the new database.
Query language − NoSQL databases often have their own query languages, which may be different from SQL. You will need to learn the new query language and determine how to translate your SQL queries into it.
Indexing − SQL databases use indexes to improve the performance of queries, but NoSQL databases often use different indexing techniques. You will need to determine the best way to index your data in the new database.
Data integrity − SQL databases typically have stronger data integrity constraints than NoSQL databases. You will need to consider how to ensure data integrity in the new database.
Scalability − NoSQL databases are often more scalable than SQL databases. However, you will need to consider how to handle the increased load on the database as it grows.
Security − You will need to consider how to secure your data in the new database, including authentication, authorization, and encryption.
Cost − NoSQL databases may have different pricing models than SQL databases, so you will need to consider the cost of the new database.
Training and support − You may need to provide training for your team on the new database and its query language, and you will need to ensure that there is sufficient support available if you encounter any issues.Advantages of Migrating from SQL to NoSQL Database
Scalability − NoSQL databases are designed to scale horizontally, which means that they can easily handle large amounts of data and high levels of traffic by adding more machines to the database. This makes them well-suited for big data and high-traffic applications.
Flexibility − NoSQL databases are generally more flexible than SQL databases because they do not require a fixed schema. This means that you can store data in a variety of formats, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data.
Performance − NoSQL databases are often faster than SQL databases because they use different indexing and data storage techniques. This can be particularly beneficial for real-time applications that require fast access to data.
Simplicity − NoSQL databases are often easier to set up and maintain than SQL databases because they have fewer features and are less complex.
Cost − NoSQL databases can be more cost-effective than SQL databases because they are often open-source and have more flexible pricing models.
Cloud compatibility − NoSQL databases are well-suited for cloud environments because they can easily scale horizontally and are designed to handle distributed data. This makes them a good choice for cloud-based applications.Conclusion
It’s important to test and validate the migrated data, monitor and optimize performance, and plan for ongoing maintenance and updates as part of your overall migration strategy.
First of all, I’d like to say, ignore my display name. I made this several years ago and I can’t be bothered at this point to make a new account.
So Basically, in this little opinionated article I’d just like to talk about some of the things that I have picked up on or noticed that perhaps are wrong or perhaps are correct over the past few days. These include the use of the digital crown on the Apple Watch, the timing of the releases of some of the iOS and apple pay features and some other things I’ve noticed.
So starting with the digital crown. I’ve seen on some article here on 9to5Mac and on other tech sites that some have been complaining about the digital crown. One of the primary complaints that I’ve seen is that how are we supposed to know when it scrolls and when it zooms. Well after re-watching the keynote from Tuesday, I picked up on some things. The crown appears to zoom whenever zooming would usually be applicable, and scrolls whenever that is applicable, as you would expect. Very rarely do you zoom and scroll vertically on the same element. For example, on a map, the crown would obviously work for scrolling because a 1-dimensional scrolling device can’t appropriately navigate the application. But then if you are changing one of the complications on the watch face, it will obviously work for scrolling, because what purpose would scrolling have there?
Now onto the design of the watch. The design, I agree isn’t perfect, and not everybody is going to love it. However, it does look splendid, in my opinion. The way that the screen curves around to meet the main body of the device, I think is really clever and really gives it an element of a screen that covers the whole device. I noticed in the UI as well, it’s mostly black so as to make a mostly seamless transition from the screen to the bezel/edge of the device. I personally think that the sport version of the watch is quite unattractive, but the other versions, in particular the space black stainless steel with either a classic buckle or link bracelet looks absolutely stunning. I also think that the sport version is where a lot of people are getting the idea it looks bad. If you look at a lot of the photos taken in person in the hands on room, it looks really nice.
Now, moving on from the Apple Watch, I’d like to talk about some of the dates that have been mentioned recently that have caught my attention.
Both Apple Pay and the continuity features of iOS 8 have been been explicitly said or rumoured to be made available in October. This, coincidentally, is exactly when Apple has previously been rumoured to be holding another event for the iPad and potentially some updates to the mac (if they have managed to do anything without the availability of the new processors from Intel). We haven’t heard anything recently about the October event, but I am still strongly in the belief that they will be holding an event within the next month and a half for the iPad. The way the features mentioned before happen to coincide with this event suggests that perhaps there is something that will tie these features together further, that will be announced at this event or maybe there will be just be solid release dates announced at the event.
Playlists are a big part of the Spotify experience. The service makes it so easy to create them that most of us often get caught up in making endless playlists. The trouble with doing this is that duplicate songs may slip in. They’ll keep coming up if you’re listening on shuffle, and they always seem to pop up at the worst possible moments. We’ve listed a couple of the fastest methods to remove them using your computer (or mobile). Read on to find out more.Using Your Computer to Remove Duplicate Songs
Thanks to the hard work of some developers, there are a number of different programs online that will remove the duplicates from your device for free.
For example, Jose M. Perez – whose main focus is building apps that extend Spotify’s functionality – has created the Spotify Dedup: a website which easily lets you get rid of duplicates from your playlist. Here’s how to get started.
Input your account/email and password.
Allow the program to process your playlist information.
Depending on the number of playlists associated with your account, you may need to wait a few seconds.
The results will be listed for you.
If you have any issues with the program listed above, here’s a link to another that works well. The steps are quite similar to the ones described above. You simply have to log in with your Spotify account, then allow the site to process your data.
Once everything is done, you have the option to “Clean all” playlists or remove just certain songs.
It’s a quick and easy method, but you can always do it manually, with the optimal method to do so listed below.Removing Spotify Duplicate Songs Manually
It may take a little longer, but you can easily delete the songs manually from your playlist on your computer. (Within reason – it will take forever if you have thousands of songs on your playlist.)
In Spotify’s desktop client, tap on the “Your Library” tab.
Select “Playlists” to bring up all your playlists.
Go through the list and delete any duplicates by tapping on the three dots next to the song and pressing on the “Remove from this playlist” option. It shouldn’t take that long and will give you more space for new songs.Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I remove Spotify playlist duplicates using my mobile device?
You can. Just keep in mind there are no dedicated apps to achieve this. You can, however, access one of the websites we linked above from your browser and proceed from there. Since you’re already logged in to your Spotify app, you won’t have to do so in a browser.2. Does this apply to Blend playlists?
It doesn’t. Blend playlists are special playlists that mix together your tastes with that of a friend’s. You can’t add additional songs to these playlists, which means you don’t really need to worry about this issue.3. How can I continue to enhance my playlist experience in Spotify?
There are many ways to expand your Spotify experience. Start by learning how to change a Spotify playlist picture on Android and transfer a Spotify playlist to Apple Music.
Spotify has revolutionized how we consume music, and it’s nice to know that there are a few easy ways to get rid of duplicate tracks on the same playlist. On the other hand, if you want to try something else, you might want to take a look at our list of the best Spotify alternatives. We also recommend reading all about creating Spotify codes to share songs with others.
Alexandra is passionate about mobile tech and can be often found fiddling with a smartphone from some obscure company. She kick-started her career in tech journalism in 2013, after working a few years as a middle-school teacher. Constantly driven by curiosity, Alexandra likes to know how things work and to share that knowledge with everyone.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox
Sign up for all newsletters.
We all know that Google doesn’t like to support the Linux platform. While the search giant uses Linux on many of its services (such as Android and Chromebook), there is never a proper Linux desktop client for its services. This is true for Picasa, Google Drive and Google Music. While you can access Google Music from your Linux desktop with Nuvola player, it is basically a wrapper for the web interface and it doesn’t come with many of the features found in most music players. For Rhythmbox fans and users, here is a way for you to access Google Music in Rhythmbox.
Rhythmbox is the default music player for Ubuntu and it allows you to use plugins to extend its functionality. The rhythmbox-gmusic plugin adds the Google Music feature to Rhythmbox, allowing you to play your cloud music in the desktop music player.
To install, simply open a terminal and type:
apt-get installrhythmbox-gmusic python-dateutil python-requests python-validictory
Update: Add these additional commands for it to work:
Activate the Google Play Music plugin. You will now see a Google Music section in the left pane.
To access your Google Music library and playlist, you have to first login and authenticate with your Google account. Once you have done that, your music and playlist will show up in the list. You can then select any song to get it playing.Limitation of Google Music plugin
At the moment, the plugin is pretty limited in functionality. There is no context menu and you can’t create any playlist, be it for your local machine or for Google Music. The closest thing you can do is to drag the song(s) to the Play Queue. Also, your music and playlist are “read only”. That means, while you can listen to your songs, you can’t make changes to them and have them sync back to the cloud.
In conclusion, if you just want to listen to your music in Rhythmbox, this plugin will allow you to do so. You will have to create playlists in the (Google Music) web interface before you can play them in Rhythmbox.
Do you think this is a useful plugin? Or you rather use Nuvola Player or directly play from the web interface?
Damien Oh started writing tech articles since 2007 and has over 10 years of experience in the tech industry. He is proficient in Windows, Linux, Mac, Android and iOS, and worked as a part time WordPress Developer. He is currently the owner and Editor-in-Chief of Make Tech Easier.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox
Sign up for all newsletters.
If there’s one certainty in life where Apple is concerned, it’s that it targets the premium end of the market. Apple would tell you that it aims to make the best products, and that these cost money to make. A more cynical observer might say that Apple aims to make the highest margins and makes the products (and adds the marketing) it takes to achieve this.
But either way, the company has always targeted those customers willing to pay the big bucks for premium products. That approach has meant that while Samsung sells almost twice as many smartphones as Apple, it’s the Cupertino company that hoovers up almost 80% of the total profits in the industry.
But there are signs that Apple may be broadening its horizons …
In a way, Apple has long aimed to have a range of products to appeal to consumers at different price points. In Macs, for example, we had the Mac Pro versus the iMac for the desktop market, and within the iMac range we have the 27-inch 5K flagship and the 21.5-inch 4K option at the more affordable end. For laptops, there’s the now very expensive MacBook Pro range at the top end while the MacBook Air still hangs in there at $999.
But the company has more recently been more actively targeting mid-market smartphone buyers by specifically designing products for them. There was the failed iPhone 5c initially, and the iPhone SE today. The latter also emulated the iPad mini in targeting both budget-conscious consumers as well as those of us who prefer a more pocketable device.
The iPhone SE has been a big success for Apple. It became the third best-selling smartphone in the U.S. and achieved even higher satisfaction ratings than later and more expensive models. It’s almost certain we’ll see a new model next year.
And just this year Apple launched a low-cost 9.7-inch iPad costing just $329, less than half the cost of the cheapest iPad Pro model, and roughly a quarter of the cost of the most expensive one. The company’s recent earnings reports strongly indicate that this has been a massive hit.
Finally, we come to services revenue. Tim Cook noted in the company’s Q2 earnings call that Apple’s services business was ‘well on the way‘ to the size of a Fortune 100 company in its own right – and confirmed that it hit this milestone in Q3.
Services revenue climbed 22% year-on-year to total $27.8B in the last 12 months. That’s not just a Fortune 100 sized business, but – as the WSJ noted – more than Facebook’s total revenue for 2023. As the above Business Insider chart shows, services are now worth more to Apple than either Mac or iPad.
The WSJ again:
“The business is really impressive when you think about it in terms of scale compared to other publicly traded companies out there,” said Jeff Dillon, chief executive of Jackson, Mich.-based Dillon & Associates, which counts Apple among its largest holdings. “There’s a long runway to go there.”
That ‘long runway’ is another way to say that the more hardware devices you sell, the more money you stand to make from services. Apple’s 30% share of app sales is a big chunk of it, of course, but there’s also its take from other iTunes sales, Apple Pay, iCloud storage, Apple Music and its doubtless profitable AppleCare business.
In fact, if you look at the trends in Apple’s income, growth in iPhone, iPad and Mac sales is all below that seen in 2023. But services revenue is soaring.
That’s not to say that Apple is going to head too far downmarket. The App Store makes twice as much money as Google Play despite a much smaller market, and that’s precisely because Apple targets better-off consumers who are willing to spend more on apps and other services. But targeting the mid-market should significantly increase its market for services income.
And the killer feature of services revenue is that it’s recurring – and even does so reliably in the case of subscription services like iCloud storage, Apple Music and Apple’s cut of in-app subscriptions. That’s particularly important at a time when people are holding onto hardware longer.
And there’s one especially attractive element of the mid-market: students, and those early in their careers. There’s a decent chunk of these people who would like to buy Apple kit but can’t quite manage or justify it at present. If you can bring them into the ecosystem now, they will become premium product customers in the future.
So it makes perfect sense for Apple to broaden its target customer base. It will never go after the budget market – the hardware margins are too slim, and the prospect of significant services sales too poor. But going after the mid-market is a gain in the short-term, and likely a far bigger win in the long-term.
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Update the detailed information about Opinion: Final Thoughts After Migrating From Apple Music To Spotify on the Moimoishop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!