You are reading the article Reddit Is More Dangerous Than The Syrian Electronic Army’s Hackers updated in February 2024 on the website Moimoishop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Reddit Is More Dangerous Than The Syrian Electronic Army’s Hackers
About an hour ago, the Associated Press’s official Twitter account, @AP, issued this tweet (it’s since been removed):
Hacked @AP Tweet
Hacked @AP Tweet
I was in the bathroom reading Twitter (I know.) when this first broke, and the first thing I saw wasn’t one of the most respected news sources in the world tweeting that the White House had been bombed. I don’t follow the AP on my personal account, so the first thing I saw was this:
The next three tweets I saw about this possibly breaking news story were as follows: “there’s no way that @AP tweet is real,” “Not believing this,” and “h a c k t i m e.” Not a single person in my feed believed the tweet; the closest was Anil Dash asking for “other sources.” The jokes followed immediately–jokes about those who had bungled coverage of the Boston Bombing (the New York Post, CNN, former Reuters social media editor Matthew Keys, Reddit), and then aggressive ignoring of the tweet. My feed, largely made up of reporters, editors, writers, and other news-types, barely even bothered to make a reasoned rejection, so silly was the AP tweet and so jaded our reaction to news.
That’s the same experience everyone had; within seconds, the balance of those talking about the tweet swung from earnest disbelief to cries of “hacked,” “fake,” and scorn. By five minutes in–an eternity on Twitter!–the conversation was almost entirely about the “AP hack,” not the “news.” Even the stock market, run by alarmist algorithms, snapped back from an absurd drop in minutes.
The Syrian Electronic Army, a largely unknown group which claimed credit for the hack, has been busy the past few days, taking control of the Twitter accounts of NPR, the BBC, @60Minutes, and more. But they’re small-h hackers, nominally political and apparently accomplished at getting access but less concerned with causing real damage than in pranks and delighting in their own cleverness. When they took control of @FIFAWorldCup, they tweeted a few times about a conspiracy against the Syrian national soccer team and then a whole bunch more times saying things like “Twitter #failure” and “Syrian Electronic Army was here.” None of their work suggests that this is a serious political group trying to effect change or even mere chaos; this is probably a handful of dumb teens.
The AP tweet was not hard to pick out as a hoax. The phrasing was wrong; the AP writes “BREAKING” in loud capital letters, whereas the hacked tweet was properly capitalized; it was sent via the web whereas legitimate @AP tweets are usually sent via Social Flow, a marketing service; and the president was referred to simply as Barack Obama, a violation of the AP’s style guide. That’s on top of the fact that, well, if there was a bombing at the White House, it’s pretty doubtful that @AP, fast as they are, would be the first and only source to get the word out; they weren’t nearly the first to tweet about the Boston Bombings, for example, and this hacked tweet was not accompanied by any corroborating eyewitness reports.
Compare the effect of this fake tweet–near-instantaneous dismissal and eye-rolling–with the very worrying case of Sunil Tripathi, a Brown University student who had been missing for a few weeks. At 2:43AM early in the morning of April 19th, one Greg Hughes, an active Reddit contributor, tweeted Tripathi’s name as a possible suspect in the Boston Bombing, citing a mention on the Boston Police Department’s scanner feed. The Atlantic’s Alexis Madrigal was unable to find anything resembling Tripathi’s name in the scanner’s logs, but it didn’t matter; within hours, Sunil had become the number one suspect in the bombings for Twitter and Reddit.
He was cleared by late afternoon, when the FBI identified the Tsarnaev brothers as the primary suspects. His whereabouts are still unknown.
Hughes’s tweet was earnest; it cited a source assumed to be trustworthy (though it is not, and it doesn’t seem to have come from that source anyway), it came from someone trying to help. It was plausible. The easiest way to fool someone is to have already fooled yourself, and in publishing something he thought was true, Hughes’s tweet became far more powerful than anything a prankster group of Syrian hackers could come up with.
* * *
These two stories show both sides of the crowd-sourced hive mind with which we analyze information on Twitter. On the one hand, the masses came to the right conclusion very quickly in the case of the AP hack; if you looked at literally a single tweet besides the one from @AP, even if you weren’t sure what to think, you’d immediately have to consider the possibility that the tweet was not genuine. It caused no damage, no panic. Nobody was hurt, really; it’s hard to even blame the Associated Press. It could happen to anyone, and the AP was conscientious in conveying what had happened (and getting their Twitter feed temporarily shut down) within minutes. The power of the crowd directed people to the truth.
And yet the painfully earnest computer-chair detective work from Reddit and Twitter may well have destroyed the life of an innocent college kid from suburban Pennsylvania. We don’t know where he is or if he’s okay, we don’t know if he’ll come back or how he’ll recover from being falsely accused of mass murder if he does. When we discuss the problem of oversaturation of news–which we should, repeatedly and at length–we need to remember that. The Syrian Electronic Army’s intentions may have been to hurt, and Reddit’s intentions may have been to help, but it doesn’t matter. Misinformation is misinformation, and Reddit proved a far more effective and destructive source than the hackers.
You're reading Reddit Is More Dangerous Than The Syrian Electronic Army’s Hackers
We’ve always held that the iPhone can be like a drug, its users addicted to just one more app, just one more high score. Now comes word from the horse’s mouth, so to speak: criminals. Theft of the iPhone and other cellphones is increasing in popularity with criminals who once sold crack cocaine.
Turns out, a new twist on iPhone thefts can be more profitable – let alone, less dangerous – than selling drugs on the street…
Despite a criminal being able to pawn a stolen iPhone for about $100, a new wrinkle nets thieves “more than I can get for selling crack cocaine,” San Francisco, California Police Chief Greg Suhr tells the San Francisco Examiner.
Instead of selling the stolen phone, thieves now act as Good Samaritans, giving back the handset they “found” to victims. The grateful owner usually gives the thief $20 for returning the valuable item, more than what Suhr said a drug dealer can earn from selling crack.
Indeed, the police chief believes a rise in cell phone thefts could explain a drop in that city’s drug-related arrests.
Along with the Good Samaritan ploy, which does an end-run around the need to sell a stolen iPhone, thieves are joining forces in ways that would make the Artful Dodger of ‘Oliver Twist’ proud.
San Francisco police say they’ve seen an increase in teams of thieves working together to steal cell phones from restaurant patrons or even bus passengers. In one instance, a man eating at Taco Bell had his phone swiped by a woman, who fled the store. When the victim tried to catch the thief, two accomplices blocked his way.
The thief was later captured by police.
The same trio attempted to grab a cellphone from a victim riding a city bus. Following a tactic more common on the NFL gridiron than the streets of San Francisco, the thief reportedly slapped the phone from the female victim’s hand.
While the victim was able to grab her phone off the floor before the criminals could reach it, police say the slapping movement is enough to startle a victim, giving the thief the upper hand.
Here’s an iPhone theft gone real bad as a security cam captures a teenager attempting to steal an iPhone 4 at an AT&T Store in Downtown Washington, DC.
All of this highlights several low-tech, but useful takeaways: don’t zone-out when talking on your phone. So often, people will carry on a conversation in public and not pay attention to their surroundings. Not only is this terribly annoying to people around you who have to put up with your insufferably boring talking, but it makes you vulnerable to theft.
Secondly, if your iPhone is valuable, don’t make it easy to steal. If you are a woman, put your phone in your purse, preferably in a zipped compartment. Also, think about adding a chain to your iPhone’s case.
As one former pickpocket told ABC recently, a cell phone is “the most frequently stolen item in the world today.”
Keep that in mind the next time you pull your iPhone out of your pocket in public.
Siri is an App that can make calls and send text messages for you when you are driving or have your hands full-It can also announce any new messages on your device. It can give necessary suggestions, like texting someone that you will be late for a meeting. Siri can help you set alarms, reminders, and even give directions to a destination.
Apple Music and Siri do work together, which means that you ask Siri to find a song for you and put it on a particular playlist.
It can even suggest your favorite songs for you at the gym; all you have to do is just to tap to play. Nowadays, you can control your appliances and do many things at once with just your voice.
Using the home App, you can create a scene and name it ‘I am home,’ which will automatically open the garage, the front door, and switch on the house lights. Siri can be operated by one or more persons, but it has to be properly configured for it to be operated by many people.
How do you set up Siri to respond to more than one user?Setting Up Your HomePod for Multiple Users
It’s quite an interesting experience for more than one person to talk to your HomePod (Siri) and get recognized. It will play their choice of music and obey every command placed by them on it. The HomePod can accept up to six people to talk to it and get recognized.
You don’t have to get every member of your family their own HomePod. Instead, you can simply add them to a single HomePod by activating the multiple user features on it.Requirement for Configuration
All the people you want to add or your family members should have iPhone running on iOS 13.2 or iPad running on iPadOS 13.2, or you just have to make sure their devices are running on the latest version of iOS.
When you update the software in the Home app on your device, it will automatically update your HomePod or all the HomePods you have on your network.The Configuration
All the people or your family members that you want to be recognized by your HomePod should be a member of your home network on your Home App. If they are not, then you have to do the following:
After that, turn on “Listen for ‘Hey, Siri’” on your HomePod’s section in the Home App.
Then turn on “Listen for ‘Hey, Siri’” on your iPhone or iPad as well.
After that, turn on Personal Request on each member’s Home App and make sure ‘Find My’ is turned on.
Also ‘Location Services’
And finally, make sure your HomePod and iOS device are set to the same language.
After all these configurations have been set up, everybody that you have sent an invitation to will get a notification within their Home App, telling them that their voice is now being recognized by the HomePod.
What if someone does not get this notification? You just have to open that person’s Home App and do the following.
The HomePod may have difficulty in differentiating the voices of two or more young children. However, the HomePod will always ask ‘who are you’ if it can’t recognize your voice. You just have to reply by saying, ‘Hey, Siri, this is … (mention your name).Final Verdict
Your family members will be thrilled to find out they have access to your HomePod (Siri). They can fill your home with their favorite types of music with just a voice command.
It will also provide learning opportunities for your children as they will be able to ask ‘Siri’ different questions and get quick and accurate answers. As always, we recommend monitoring their activities to make sure that they don’t abuse the use of your HomePod.
Nobody knows just how many dogs there are in the United States, but there are plenty—and many of them live (and pee) in human cities. Turns out, canine bathroom breaks may have more of an impact on the environment than you might think.
In a new study, a team of Columbia University undergraduate and graduate researchers led by ecologist Krista McGuire looked at the impact of pee on the urban soil microbiome. They found evidence that the nitrogen content and low pH of the urine can make city soil both harder and less absorbent of rainwater, while making the soil microbiome less diverse.
The project was born out of McGuire’s observations with colleagues during other research on green infrastructure in NYC. In sites like unfenced tree pits, “the soils seemed barren, compacted, and the water from rainfall didn’t seem to penetrate very well,” she says.
The team suspected soil’s characteristics had something to do with all the dogs that urinated on those sites, so they designed an experiment to check. “We obtained soil from the city environment,” says McGuire, along with one species of commonly-used plant from the same nursery the city uses.
Both of these factors replicate what’s used out in the real world. Getting actual dog pee turned out to be harder. They approached animal shelters, which mostly turned them away, while the one shelter that acquiesced didn’t yield enough pee—the experiment required a whopping 40 gallons.
“Despite visiting the shelter twice a week for a couple months, less than 40mL [1.35 oz] of urine was collected due to difficulty in predicting when the dogs will urinate and the dogs’ refusal to continue urinating when a collecting bowl was brought near them as they were about to urinate,” the paper states.
“Ultimately, we decided to use coyote urine since coyotes are very closely related to domestic dogs, and their urine is commercially available,” McGuire says. If you’re not a gardener looking to repel deer from your tulips, you may not be aware of this, but yes, you can buy 40 gallons of coyote pee pretty easily.
Over the course of a month, they ran a greenhouse experiment, watering the plants at regular intervals with either straight water or water mixed with urine at different concentrations. They checked the soil each week. The results were dramatic: the bacterial community diversity decreased by up to a third during the experiment, and the kinds of bacteria in the microbiome changed. Meanwhile, the “runoff” from pots increased significantly, signifying that the soil was becoming less absorbent.
Outside the lab (say, outside your door), “a variety of different events can affect the impact of urine deposition,” says Gary King, a Louisiana State University biology professor who studies urban microbiomes. This experiment doesn’t address those factors—like, what if it’s raining, or what if some other pollutant has recently entered the soil?
But the results point to an important direction of research, he says. “There is a huge gap in our knowledge about basic microbial functions in the soils that are part of the system in our own built environment.”
To keep this from happening, cities like New York are investing lots of money in building and maintaining green infrastructure, from street trees to deliberately designed water capture landscapes called “bioswales.” But as this research indicates, our furry friends’ bathroom breaks may be making these interventions less effective.
Although cyberattacks caused just 6 percent of significant outages of public electronic communications networks and services in the E.U. last year, they affected more people than hardware failure, a much more common factor in service disruptions, according to a report from the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA).
Hardware failure accounted for 38 percent of all incidents and affected over 1.4 million users on average according to an annual incidents report released Tuesday by ENISA. By comparison, incidents that resulted from cyberattacks affected 1.8 million users on average.
Cyberattacks affected primarily Internet access and were the second most common cause for outages of fixed Internet service in particular, accounting for 20 percent of those incidents, ENISA said. They also accounted for around 13 percent of incidents that disrupted mobile Internet service.
The ENISA report compiles data on 79 incidents that occurred across 18 E.U. member states in 2012 and resulted in severe outages of both mobile and fixed telephony and Internet services. ENISA defines fixed Internet and telephony services as those offered through dial-up, DSL, cable, fiber, PSTN, VoIP over DSL and other wired networks.
Providers of electronic communication services are required to report significant network security and integrity breaches to national regulatory agencies, which in turn report them to ENISA and the European Commission. Nine countries did not report any incidents for 2012 and one country hasn’t implemented reporting capabilities yet, ENISA said.Organizing the chaos
The agency organized incidents into five root cause categories, but also split them by more detailed causes. The root cause categories were system failure, third-party failure, malicious actions, human errors and natural phenomena.
The most common root cause for incidents that resulted in outages was system failure. This accounted for 76 percent of outages and included incidents caused by both hardware and software issues. Most incidents in the system failure category affected switches, including routers and local exchange points, and home location registries, ENISA said.
Third-party failures accounted for 13 percent of incidents, malicious actions accounted for 8 percent, natural phenomena for 6 percent and human errors for 5 percent. Some incidents fell into multiple categories, the agency said.
Incidents caused by natural phenomena—storms, floods, heavy snowfall, earthquakes and other natural disasters—and those caused by human error resulted in the longest outages, 36 hours and 26 hours on average, respectively. However, they affected relatively low numbers of users at 557,000 and 447,000 on average.
Outages resulting from malicious actions, including physical attacks against network equipment, cyberattacks and cable theft, affected 1.5 million users on average and lasted for 4 hours.
Outages that resulted from third-party failures affected the largest number of users, 2.8 million and lasted for 13 hours, while those caused by system failures lasted nine hours and affected 2.3 million users, on average.
Outages resulting from malicious actions, including physical attacks against network equipment, cyberattacks and cable theft, affected 1.5 million users on average and lasted for 4 hours.
ENISA’s report does not include details about specific incidents and does not reveal the names of the affected service providers. However it does provide some examples of incidents it received over the past two years.
One incident caused by a cyberattack was described like this: “A series of Distributed Denial of Service attacks targeted a provider’s domain name service. Up to 2.5 million mobile Internet users were affected during 1-2 hours. The attacking IP-addresses were tracked and blocked, the load balancing units were restarted and the traffic could be recovered. As post-incident actions additional DNS servers were installed, configuration changes were made on firewalls and hardware was expanded to withstand similar attacks.”
The statistics in the report suggests that the percentage of incidents caused by cyberattacks increased in 2012 compared to 2011. However, ENISA warned that data from only two years of reporting is not enough to draw conclusions about any trends.
Overall, mobile networks were most affected by outages with 50 percent of all reported incidents affecting mobile telephony or mobile Internet services.
“In 37 percent of the incidents there was impact on emergency calls using the emergency number 112,” ENISA said.
Online privacy experts say Facebook, Instagram and Spotify are the most commonly hacked account types in the United States.
Hackers use leaked credentials to break into accounts or steal login details via phishing emails.
Businesses can secure their accounts with strong passwords, multifactor authentication, password managers and VPNs.
This article is for business owners and IT administrators who want to secure their accounts and increase overall cybersecurity.
Few things are scarier for a business than learning an account has been hacked. A compromised account can quickly balloon into a massive problem involving data breaches or even business closures.
Hackers have clear favorites when targeting accounts – and employ various techniques to breach them. Fortunately, businesses can take measures to boost account security and protect their vital data, including customer information. We’ll discuss the 10 most commonly targeted account types and share best practices for securing all your business accounts.Top 10 accounts hackers target
Like most theft, cybercrime is heavily focused on opportunity versus payoff. While hacking a bank account may be highly profitable, it is typically much better protected than other accounts. Instead, hackers will target a range of accounts that may not be immediately profitable but still have significant worth if exploited correctly.
According to a VPN Central study, here are the most commonly attacked account types:
Facebook accounts: Facebook accounts were the most commonly hacked account type in the United States by a wide margin. The study found that Google hacking-related searches for Facebook accounts numbered 67,940 on average per month.
Instagram accounts: The second most-hacked account was Instagram, with 36,220 searchers on average per month.
Spotify accounts: Spotify rounded out the top three, with 25,920 hacking-related searches conducted per month.
Twitch accounts: Twitch was in fourth place, with 10,800 average monthly searches.
Amazon accounts: Amazon took fifth place, with 6,170 average monthly searches.
Snapchat accounts: Snapchat landed in sixth place, with 6,100 average monthly searches.
Coinbase accounts: Coinbase followed Snapchat closely to reach seventh place, with 5,900 average monthly searches.
Twitter accounts: Twitter took eighth place, with 5,190 average monthly searches.
Gmail accounts: Gmail accounts were in ninth place, with 4,920 average monthly searches.
Microsoft accounts: Microsoft rounded out the top 10, with 4,000 average monthly searches.
Facebook’s preeminence as the most targeted account type isn’t surprising. Facebook is extremely popular in the U.S., with 239 million users in 2023. Such popularity significantly increases the gross number of accounts vulnerable to malicious compromise. Facebook’s integrations with Facebook Pay and general business Facebook uses mean hackers can find considerable value in taking over accounts.
This rationale largely holds true across all the most targeted accounts. Instagram’s business uses are powerful, while Twitter for business and Snapchat for business are growing in popularity, making them attractive hacker targets. Additionally, if your Amazon store or Amazon Business account is compromised, hackers can use your credentials to purchase high-ticket items. And Gmail and Microsoft accounts can provide access to broader company networks, leading to additional compromises.
To recover from a data breach, hire a forensic expert to analyze the damage, talk to a lawyer specializing in data security breaches, inform the affected parties and implement robust security measures to prevent future attacks.Everyday actions that lead to compromised accounts
Hackers compromise accounts in myriad ways. While some tactics may be as simple as getting lucky and guessing a weak password, other actions can be more involved.
Cybersecurity studies have pinpointed the most common causes of compromised accounts:
Verizon’s Data Breach Investigations Report: According to Verizon’s 2023 Data Breach Investigations Report, stolen credentials were the top cause of data breaches, as attackers compromise accounts using leaked login information. Login information is often compromised when account holders use the same email and password combinations across numerous accounts. Once login details for one account are leaked, hackers can often use this information in their other accounts.
IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report: IBM’s 2023 Cost of a Data Breach Report also found compromised or stolen credentials to be the primary initial vector through which hackers can breach accounts, cited in 19 percent of all cases. Phishing (16 percent) and cloud misconfiguration (15 percent) were the second and third most common initial attack vectors. While an average user can’t do much to secure their accounts against a business’s cloud misconfiguration, everyone should learn to recognize and avoid phishing emails designed to steal credentials.
Other typical sources of account compromise include the following:
Weak passwords: Using common or weak passwords, such as “password” or “123456,” can compromise accounts. These passwords are easily guessable by humans, and hacking software can break into accounts using these passwords in a matter of seconds.
Unsecured Wi-Fi networks: Logging in to accounts on unsecured or public Wi-Fi networks is also dangerous. Hackers can set up malicious, lookalike public Wi-Fi networks that record user data, including login credentials.
Malware: Specific types of malware can record a user’s activity and send it to a hacker, including any typed passwords or websites visited.
Unsafe password storage: Storing passwords in an unencrypted file or cloud storage account can be dangerous. If a hacker can access this file, they will have complete knowledge of every account login.
Did You Know?
Signs your computer is infected by malware include poor performance, unexpected pop-up windows, strange sounds, and unexplained file and folder changes.How compromised accounts can impact a small business
Account compromise can cause more than an inconvenience for a small business. While some accounts are quickly recovered, the compromise can last for a significant amount of time on other occasions – often without the account owner’s awareness.
Depending on the compromise’s length and severity, a business could face a range of consequences, including the following:
Compromised accounts reduce productivity. One compromised account can lead to business productivity losses, depending on the account’s importance and how long it takes to recover control of the account.
Compromised accounts may be lost entirely. Hackers may compromise a trusted business account, particularly on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, to distribute spam or malware. In such cases, the platform may permanently suspend the account. This can be particularly painful for businesses that have invested significant time to earn followers or rely on high social media engagement levels.
Compromised accounts can cause lost sales. Compromised accounts related to sales or payments can cause financial distress. The business may struggle to reclaim the account or find new workaround methods to conduct operations. Business or system downtime could also cause customers to go to a competitor.
Compromised accounts can damage a business’s reputation. A significant or highly public account compromise can cause long-lasting reputational damage. For instance, losing a high-profile Twitter or Facebook account to hackers could make a brand seem untrustworthy.
Compromised accounts can lead to more account compromises. Sophisticated hackers who compromised one business account may use that as a stepping stone to compromise additional accounts in a business.
Compromised accounts leave the network vulnerable. If a hacker manages to compromise an internal account, such as a Microsoft account, they could use this intrusion to try to compromise a business’s entire network.
Compromised accounts can lead to lost money. Hackers could use compromised accounts to access financial accounts or payment systems. This could lead to significant financial losses, along with the costs associated with system repair and potential downtime.
Compromised accounts can cause prolonged business disruption. Hackers may also deploy ransomware on a target’s network, encrypting all business data and causing significant downtime, losses and system recovery costs. According to Statista, ransomware attacks led to an average of 20 days of system downtime in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Compromised accounts can lead to sensitive information theft. In severe cases, hackers could use a compromised account to conduct a data breach. Hackers may steal sensitive intellectual property, customer information or other valuable data. For businesses with fewer than 500 employees, a joint study by IBM and the Ponemon Institute found the average cost of a data breach was $2.98 million.
Compromised accounts can create regulatory or legal consequences. Depending on the type of information breached, businesses may have to pay regulatory fines. For instance, the breach of any personal information belonging to EU citizens could lead to fines through the GDPR. Likewise, a breach of payment card data could lead to fines due to noncompliance with PCI.
Compromised accounts can cause business closure. In a worst-case scenario, account compromise could lead to business closure due to significant reputational damage and loss of sales, financial theft, or high costs due to regulatory and legal fines, ransoms, or data recovery costs.
Did You Know?
Account compromises and data breaches can happen to businesses of any size, not just big players. According to the Verizon data breach report, at least 14 percent of recorded data breaches affected SMBs. That number is likely even higher because 81 percent of data breaches affected companies of unknown size.How to protect your accounts from hackers
While account compromise can lead to significant business disruptions, a small business can take numerous concrete steps to increase its overall security. Consider the following best practices:
Use strong passwords. Mandate the use of unique, strong passwords throughout your organization.
Store passwords with password managers. Instead of storing passwords in text files or using easy-to-remember passwords, use password managers to generate and store unique passwords for each account.
Use multifactor authentication. Use multifactor authentication (MFA) on all accounts whenever possible. MFA requires a second level of authentication to log in to an account, such as a code sent to your phone or a biometric element like a fingerprint.
Use a VPN. Have your team use a VPN (virtual private network) when using public Wi-Fi or accessing work accounts outside the office.
Stay updated. Regularly update your apps and operating system. Regular updates can help prevent attackers from using discovered vulnerabilities to hack into an account.
Train your employees in cybersecurity. Host regular cybersecurity training sessions for all employees. In particular, educate employees about how to spot and avoid phishing emails.
Change passwords regularly. Change passwords across accounts on a regular schedule. If you learn that an account that shares a password with other accounts has been compromised, immediately change passwords on all accounts.
Monitor accounts for suspicious activity. If you notice anything suspicious, immediately contact the platform, use its security features to log out of the account in all locations, and immediately change the account’s password.
Poor access management can lead to data breaches. Create a robust access management policy by taking a zero-trust approach, auditing employee accounts and staying on top of compliance regulations.Business security through account security
Accounts – particularly public-facing accounts like social media or email – can be a cybersecurity weak spot for businesses. These accounts are easy for hackers to spot and target.
While most account compromise attempts don’t lead to catastrophic scenarios, sophisticated hackers can exploit account access and cause tremendous damage to a business. Fortunately, by following the outlined cybersecurity steps, businesses can go a long way toward protecting their accounts and overall business security.
Update the detailed information about Reddit Is More Dangerous Than The Syrian Electronic Army’s Hackers on the Moimoishop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!