Trending February 2024 # Ubuntu Vs. Fedora: The Latest Versions Square Off # Suggested March 2024 # Top 3 Popular

You are reading the article Ubuntu Vs. Fedora: The Latest Versions Square Off updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Ubuntu Vs. Fedora: The Latest Versions Square Off

Ubuntu regularly claims to be the most popular Linux distribution. But, if so, Fedora is a competitive second. Both have thriving communities and are a major source of free and open source software innovation.

Regularly, you can read on mailing lists of users having grown discontented with one and deciding to migrate to the other. In many users’ minds, each is an alternative to the other.

But how do the distributions really compare?

The most reliable answer is to examine the latest releases, Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) and Fedora 13 (Goddard) — or, to be exact, Fedora 13’s release candidate, since last minute concerns delayed the final release that was expected this week by another seven days. Dealing with a release candidate does put some restrictions on the comparison, but, to judge from previous releases, not enough to affect the overall impressions.

Basically, with its reputation for innovation and its determination to provide only free software, the latest Fedora ranks among the best of the traditional distributions, with a GNOME desktop only lightly customize and branded. By contrast, Ubuntu’s latest version places a higher emphasis on usability and commercial competitiveness — so much so that it is making many of its changes inside the distribution before they are accepted by the GNOME project itself.

Yet despite these different outlooks and goals, the differences turn out to be small, especially from an end-user’s perspective.

Most of the reservations about working with the Fedora release candidate are about installation and starting the new system. To start with, the Fedora team has chosen not to focus on squeezing a usable system on to a single CD during development, leaving most users to download a CD set or a single DVD. The sole exception is the KDE spin, which does have a Live CD. While the Fedora download page promise s Live CDs for the final release, for now, the curious are left with a three hour download (unless you get lucky with BitTorrent). This decision is much less convenient than the single CD for the latest Ubuntu download.

Both Ubuntu and Fedora have simple default installs, aimed more at newer users than experts, although Ubuntu also offers a more customizable alternate installer. Each of the defaults creates a single ext4 installation partition and a swap partition, although Fedora’s default swap partition is almost a quarter larger than Ubuntu’s.

To boot, Ubuntu uses GRUB2 — the only major distribution, so far as I know, to do so. Like most distributions, Fedora continues to use GRUB Legacy, a difference that newer users will never notice and more experienced users might prefer because it is easier to edit manually.

Both distributions use Plymouth to reduce bootup time, although in practice, the Fedora release candidate took almost ninety seconds to boot on my test machine, compared to nineteen seconds for Ubuntu. Judging by the previous official releases, this difference is likely to narrow considerably after Fedora 13’s official release, but not be eliminated entirely.

Fedora desktop

Both Fedora and Ubuntu are GNOME-centered distributions, with KDE, Xfce, and other desktops as alternatives. Fedora has included fresh art for each new release for several years now, so its wallpaper compares favorably with Ubuntu’s much-discussed new color-coded scheme.

In fact, apart from the fact that Fedora’s desktop wallpaper favors shades of blue while Ubuntu’s is mostly shades of aubergine (purple), the two themes are remarkably similar, each one involving semi-abstract gradients and swirls of color. You might not think that the same artist had done both wallpapers, but they could easily be from the same school of design.

The two desktops are also easily recognized as variations on standard GNOME, with one panel at the top for menus, applets, and other basic utilities such as the notification tray and date and time, and another on the bottom for a task bar and virtual work space.

Next Page: Ubuntu and Fedora Productivity Software Selection

Still, the departures from standard GNOME that do exist are largely in Ubuntu. Working within the distribution rather than within the GNOME project, Ubuntu has rewritten the notification system, making it more useful, but also more obtrusive.

Ubuntu has also given the corners of the desktop specific functions: the top left for menus, the top right for log off actions, the bottom left for showing the desktop, and the bottom right for the trash can. Another Ubuntu innovation is the MeMenu, which attempts to create a centralized place for managing social media accounts and chats.

Undoubtedly, the largest difference in Ubuntu defaults is the placement of the title bar buttons on the left and the elimination of the window menu. This arrangement leaves a broad space on the right of each window’s title bar, which in another release or two might be filled with some other useful information.

Yet for all the discussion of this arrangement, the worst that can be said is that it is initially awkward, while the best is that you can quickly get used to the change. Despite all the attention lavished on the change, it really doesn’t affect your computing for better or worse.

Ubuntu desktop

Neither the latest Fedora nor Ubuntu strays very far from their shared GNOME roots in software selection. Both include the standard GNOME productivity applications, such as Firefox for browsing, Evolution for Email, and Empathy for messaging.

Each distro does include some applications that the other doesn’t. For example, Ubuntu includes Computer Janitor and Gwibber, while Fedora boasts Network Manager and its ABRT (Automatic Bug Reporting Tool). Yet, generally, the differences are not vast.

The greatest difference is that, because Fedora uses Shotwell for image management and Gnote instead of Tomboy for a note system, it does not depend on the controversial Mono framework. These decisions seem to have been made to help free space on the Live CD, but those who disapprove of Mono will probably welcome them.

If anything, the most important difference in the distros’ selection of productivity software is that Fedora includes only free software. If its users want to use Adobe Flash or Adobe Acrobat, they have to look elsewhere, and not in the Fedora repositories. The same goes for proprietary NVidia drivers and the MP3 codec.

Its Hardware Drivers tool in the Administration menu is essentially designed for managing such proprietary exceptions.

Yet, in the name of usability, Ubuntu does provide a link to the libdvdcss2 library for viewing videos. Although, like Fedora, it declines to include the library in its repositories because of its uncertain legal status in many parts of the world.

Even when the distributions include different applications for the same function, you frequently need to be watching closely to see the difference. The most obvious example of this similarity is Fedora’s PackageKit and the Ubuntu Software Center, the tools used for the installation of software packages.

Although developed separately and arranged differently in their windows, the functionality is almost identical, so much so that a casual user is unlikely to guess that Fedora uses .RPM packages and Ubuntu .DEB packages. Although PackageKit has more options for filtering the results that are displayed, the most visible difference is the larger size of the Ubuntu Software Center’s icons, which makes the package installer superficially more user-friendly.

The default choices in the latest Ubuntu and Fedora releases are both based on a version of the GNOME desktop that represents eight years of constant evolution. Each distribution modifies the desktop, but rarely to an extent that the other cannot duplicate it with twenty minutes of adjusting features and installing software.

Another implication of GNOME’s maturity is that apparently little can be done to improve it without radical changes. True, Ubuntu’s new default theme may be more commercial than Fedora’s in that it reminds people of Windows and OS X color scheme. Yet, overall, I have trouble seeing that Ubuntu’s emphasis on usability for the past year has enhanced the GNOME desktop to any significant degree.

No doubt that is why Ubuntu’s next release will not include the GNOME Shell.

Of course, users might have other reasons for preferring either Ubuntu 10.04 or Fedora 13. For those who just want their desktop to work, the inclusion of proprietary extras might be a reason for preferring Ubuntu. Others, believing in free software ideals, might prefer Fedora’s banning of proprietary elements. Similarly, Ubuntu’s faster boot time might appeal to some, while the easy of editing with Legacy GRUB might be the deciding factor in favor of Fedora in some cases.

To devoted fans, the differences in the distros may loom large, but I suspect that the rest of us are unlikely to agree. These days, a change of desktops within a distribution is probably going to seem a more disruptive change than switching from one GNOME-based distribution to another.

You're reading Ubuntu Vs. Fedora: The Latest Versions Square Off

Guide To Lists Of Latest Ssrs Versions

Introduction to SSRS Versions

Web development, programming languages, Software testing & others

SSRS versions

The reporting SQL services of 2023 is released on 24th June 2023, and the product version is 15.0.1102.911

Here they fixed a flaw for registering an instance of report server to provide Power BI feature via pin. They solved an issue in screen readers when reading the additional rows and columns for a table when it is exported in HTML with an original HTML document type.

The product version 15.0.1102.896 and it is released on 7th April 2023 which fixed many issues. This release solved an issue where the screen readers viewing the additional column and row for tablix when shipped to MHTML and solved the Teradata that depends on data resources that have a NULL value. This new release fixed the shortcomings in SSRS MHTML render in the old released HTML document type.

The SSRS 14.0.600.1669 released on 31st August 2023 fixed security updates and attachment support which doesn’t enable PDF documents.

The SSRS version 14.0.600.1572 released on 6th April 2023 fixed case-sensitivity URL, Jquery updated from U1 to 1.12 and fixed placing parameters in the right one. It also solved the string which is not functioning at the rendering of HTML5. The libraries of analysis services client updated the address from TLS 1 to 1.1

The SSRS version released on 13th November 2023 was 14.0.600.1451 which fixed paginated reports that don’t function correctly when snapshot enabled in filter options. The browser role and its user settings don’t have rights to download the excel sheets are fixed in this version. It fixed the failure of the Power BI report server to SSRS at the time of upgrade. After the upgrade, an invalid character appeared in the header message is also fixed. It solves the configuration components which cancel the modal windows in the database column restart the reporting services. It fixes the property of the border tool in the textbox manages the area which is not rendered in Excel format. The issue with pagination is fixed when it gets few reports struck with rendering the exact page without getting to the last report page.

The SSRS release of 14.0.600.1109 on 12th February 2023 fixed many toolbar and deadlock issues. It fixed the snapshot of the cache report which has changed the schedule to report schedule after the modification of the subscription plan. It solves the toolbar equals to false which is not operating in Express edition. Few Thai alphabets render incorrectly when exported to PDF from paginated reports. The notification that occurred during deadlock follows the data-driven policies which are fixed in this version. The embedded pictures are not showed in few scenarios when the parameter toolbar=false is implied. It fixed security updates and linked the reports UI which is not displayed. The edited subscription which is organized at irregular intervals is solved in this version. The irregular fonts and unwanted whitespaces in paginated reports are solved in nested tablix. The header row becomes blank when it’s expanded which is fixed in this version.

The SSRS version 14.0.600.892 released on 31st August 2023 fixed the behavior changes in browser role and updated the runtime of mobile reports. In the parameter area, the missing scrollbar is fixed and it aligns the header column when scrolling at bottom of the report. The deadlock is fixed when it has occurred at the execution of CRM.


Hence these are the few latest version of SSRS released to upgrade the system services by fixing the shortcoming of the previous one.

Recommended Articles

This is a guide to SSRS Versions. Here we discuss the Introduction, Lists of SSRS Versions respectively. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –

Stripe Vs. Square: How They Measure Up

There was a time when businesses could get away with only accepting cash payments, but it isn’t much of an option in today’s environment. While there isn’t much of a choice to be made of whether or not to accept credit cards, you do have a choice as to which of the best credit card processors you will use. Two of the main options small businesses have are Stripe and Square. Both are highly regarded and offer a lot of benefits. 

To give you a better idea of which is right for your business, we researched the two against each other. We examined several areas, including pricing, security, software and hardware, integrations, and customer service. Here is how the two stack up against each other.

Stripe vs. Square highlights

Both Stripe and Square are third-party payment processors that enable businesses to accept a variety of credit and debit cards, as well as digital payment methods like Apple Pay. They are both PCI-compliant, which is essential for any merchant. However, they have some distinctions and different capabilities. Here is more about who these services are best for and how they compare in specific areas.

 StripeSquareBest forE-commerce businesses and web developersBrick-and-mortar and multichannel businessesPricing2.9% + $0.30 (online); 2.7% + $0.05 (in-person)$0 – $72 monthly fee; 2.6% – 2.9% + $0.30Third-party integrationsHundreds, including QuickBooks, AWS, and NetSuiteOver 350, including QuickBooks, Wix, and DoorDashHardwareBBPOS Chipper 2X BT mobile, BBPOS WisePOS E terminalSquare mobile reader, Square Terminal, Square POS RegisterPayment methodsOnline checkout, virtual terminal, Apple/Google PayOnline checkout, virtual terminal, invoicing, POS hardware, Apple/Google Pay, Cash App, ACHCustomer service24/7 support by phone, chat, and emailPhone (Mon.-Fri. 6 AM – 6 PM PST), email, live chat

Editor’s note: Looking for the right credit card processor for your business? Fill out the below questionnaire to have our vendor partners contact you about your needs.


International cards incur an additional 1% fee, plus another 1% if currency conversion is required.


Before committing to a service, you should have a clear idea of how credit card processing fees work so that you know exactly what you are paying for.

Processing  Stripe processing 

The vast majority of Stripe’s credit card processing focus is on e-commerce transactions. To ensure you get Stripe running smoothly, it provides a host of developer resources for integrating its payment platform with your e-commerce site. As a supplement, a virtual terminal is also available. This web-based interface, Stripe Terminal, allows you to accept cards in person by manually keying in the card information. In addition to credit and debit cards, Terminal accepts Apple Pay and Google Pay. Transactions processed through Terminal are integrated with your online transactions for reporting purposes, so you can see all of your transactions in one place. 

The standard process is that payouts from Stripe sales revenue arrive in your bank account on a two-day rolling basis. If you prefer, you can set up weekly or monthly batches. Stripe has a relatively low chargeback fee of $15, which is fully refundable if the customer’s bank resolves the dispute in your favor. 

Square processing 

Square gives merchants multiple ways to accept payments, including online, invoicing, hosted checkout payment pages, point-of-sale (POS) systems and virtual terminals. In addition to major credit cards, you can accept Apple Pay, Google Pay, Cash App, Samsung Pay, and ACH for invoices.

Square holds your sales revenue in a Square Checking account. You can then transfer the money to another bank within a day. If you need it instantly, you can get it for a fee. 


Square offers more ways for your customers to pay, both in terms of location (POS) and types of payment (Cash App and Samsung Pay). It also can get money to your bank account sooner for free. However, we like that Stripe automatically transfers your money without the extra step of going into the app to move it every time. Square narrowly wins in this category.

Security Stripe security

Stripe includes several online payment security features in its standard plan.

3D Secure: This authentication method verifies a customer’s identity before an online purchase.

Card account updater: This automatically updates expired or renewed card information for saved customers, thereby reducing declined charges.

Radar adaptive acceptance: Stripe’s machine learning algorithms purport to improve authorization rates in real time, increasing sales by reducing declined transactions.

Stripe has additional security features available that allow merchants to verify the authenticity of government-issued identification by either matching photos ($1.50 per verification) or having customers key in their name, date of birth, and other data and validating it against government and third-party databases (this is only available for U.S. Social Security numbers). 

Square security

Square is PCI-compliant, encrypting customer payment information end to end. This ensures that none of your customers’ private information is stored on your servers or devices. Its card readers are EMV-compliant, which means they accept chips. This functionality can help decrease fraud incidents. Additionally, Square uses machine learning models to identify suspicious transactions. 

Square has no chargeback fees and, in a dispute, represents you with the issuing bank.


Stripe’s ability for merchants to verify cardholder identities at the point of sale makes it the winner in the security category.

Software Stripe software

Stripe offers a mobile app that allows you to search transactions, refund purchases, and view sales and customer data. You cannot use this app to process transactions, however. If you want to do that on the go, you will need to use Stripe’s mobile Terminal software.

Square software

Square’s software makes it easy for businesses that sell through multiple channels to see all of their transactions in one interface. For online transactions, Square lets you process individual transactions on your site, set up recurring transactions, and even process multi-party transactions by layering in a fee on top of third-party payments that you process through your app. 

Square can integrate with your website through dedicated developer tools, or you can use Square Checkout, which redirects customers to a Square-hosted payment page.


Square offers full CRM functionality, as it lets you link purchases to customer profiles and inventory. If you need a separate CRM tool, check out our recommendations of the best CRM systems.

Best Netbook Os: Ubuntu Vs. Xp Vs. Windows 7

What’s the best OS for use on the new ultra-portable netbook systems? I used a Samsung NC10 netbook and three operating systems to try to find out the answer.

The Samsung NC10 is a pretty standard netbook –1.6GHz Intel Atom N270 processor, 1GB RAM, 160GB hard drive, and a really nice 10.2-inch WSVGA screen. The NC10 comes with Windows XP Home as the preinstalled OS.

As you’d expect, Windows XP runs really nicely on the NC10. Despite having what many consider to be a lowly specification, a netbook is a very capable system. Given that Windows XP is now more than seven years old, the inevitability of Moore’s Law has meant that budget hardware can deliver a fantastic computing experience. The biggest problem with XP, especially for anyone who has used a more modern OS, is that it looks and feels long in the tooth.

However, no matter how tired that Windows XP looks and feels, it works very well on the NC10, and everything on the netbook is designed with XP in mind.

So, how will the little Samsung netbook feel with a different OS loaded onto it?

The two operating systems that I tried were Ubuntu 8.10 “Intrepid Ibex” and Windows 7 beta build 7000, both of which in their 32-bit flavors. (I didn’t see any point to loading a 64-bit OS onto a system with only 1GB of RAM).

The first point to make is that Windows 7 is a BETA. That means things can go wrong and if they do, you are very much on your own. Don’t expect your OEM to help you out, and don’t expect much in the way of support from Microsoft.

The second point to note is that when changing the default OS on any system it’s possible to run into trouble. Unless you are comfortable with installing, reinstalling, backing up, finding and installing drivers and general troubleshooting then you should stick with whatever OS came installed on your system.

The final point worth making is that I made sure that the BIOS firmware was the very latest code before attempting to install either of the new OSes.

The method I used for installing the operating systems was a simple one – I dug out my USB external CD/DVD drive and hooked that to a USB port. This seemed far simpler than messing about with USB flash drives.

First off I installed Ubuntu 8.10. Overall the installation process was quick and simple – something that I’ve come to expect of this particular Linux distro – and I ended up with a snappy OS.

Problem was, a lot of things seemed flaky. The most obvious of these was the fact that the trackpad seemed to behave very oddly and the Wi-Fi just wouldn’t work. I later also discovered that the special Fn (function) keys weren’t working, something which I was expecting.

These issues aren’t deal-breakers by any means, and solutions are at hand. A good source of information was Ubuntu’s own help site, which provided me with solutions to most of the issues I’d noticed. It also informed me about a few issues that I hadn’t noticed relating to the speaker sounds not cutting out when headphones are used.

At best, when running Ubuntu 8.10 on the Samsung NC10 you end up with most of the Fn keys not working (brightness does, but all others, such as monitor switching and sleep, are dead), a non-functioning Wi-Fi on/off switch and no trackpad multi-touch.

For me, while having features that I couldn’t use might bug me occasionally, I don’t think that they would be deal-breakers, although the inability to switch off Wi-Fi could be a pain at times.

From a performance perspective, the netbook has no problems handling the full desktop OS. While it’s hard to be sure, I’d say that Ubuntu is faster and snappier than XP, and applications such as Firefox and chúng tôi are quite functional. If you can live with a few non-functional Fn keys, and are up for a little problem solving, Ubuntu is overall an improvement over the pre-installed XP OS.

Next up, Windows 7 beta. The leap from XP to Windows 7 meant that there was no chance of upgrading the system. However, for a system I was going to put into daily use I wouldn’t take that shortcut because the best way to install Windows is always to carry out a clean install.

As someone who primarily uses Windows (although I do have systems running both Mac and Linux too) I like Windows 7, like it a lot. To begin with, 7 is a pleasure to install.

The time gap between popping the DVD in the drive and being at the desktop actually working is around 20 minutes, and small things such as not making the Windows Experience Index test mandatory during the first run (something which can take quite a bit of time on slower systems) represent a huge improvement over Vista.

In case you’re wondering, the NC10 scores a respectable 2.1 on the Windows Experience Index rating, making it an ideal general-purpose PC.

Next Page: Which OS is ultimately best on an Netbook?

Square Video Review: Create Instagram Videos Without Square Cropping

Instagram is a joy for some and an irritation for others. One common complaint about the photography-based social networking site and third-party photo editing apps that support it is the 1:1 ratio. While it makes Instagram images and videos iconic, it makes some photography fans nuts.

Instagram is a joy for some and an irritation for others. One common complaint about the photography-based social networking site and third-party photo editing apps that support it is the 1:1 ratio. While it makes Instagram images and videos iconic, it makes some photography fans nuts.

Square Video makes it possible for you to upload videos to Instagram using wide screen and portrait ratios so you can share your clips the way they looked when you recorded them…


This app is about as bare bones as a video-editing app can get. There are two sections. You can choose a video and trim a video. That is it. In the video choosing section, you will see a thumbnail list of all videos currently in your iPhone. Each thumbnail shows the video length and the first frame of the clip.

You can select a video from a different album by tapping the “Albums” icon at the bottom of the screen. In this section, you can also go to the Settings section, but there are not settings. It just shows you a list of the developer’s other available apps.

In the video trimming section, you will see the video in the main portion of the screen, as it will look after being rendered. For example, videos taken in landscape mode will have a white banner at the top and bottom of the frame to make the clip look like it is being viewed in wide screen. At the top of the video, you will see the play button. At the bottom of the video, the current start time and length of clipped video are displayed in the right and left corners.

At the very bottom of the screen, the videos frames are laid out, along with video trim controls so you can adjust your clip to the exact start and end time within the maximum 15-second allotment.

App Use

Just as the design of this app is bare bones, so is the execution of it. You can do two things. You can pick a video and you can trim a video.

To create a wide-screen or portrait video suitable for Instagram, tap the “Videos” icon at the top left corner of the screen. Then, pick the video you’d like to edit and share on Instagram.

The video trim section will automatically appear when you pick the clip. You will immediately see what it will look like after it has been rendered in 1:1 ratio. If your video was recorded in landscape, a white banner will appear at the top and bottom of the screen. If you recorded your video in portrait mode, the white banner will appear on the left and right side.

The app only creates a maximum length of 15-second videos, so if your clip is longer than that, you will need to trim it.

To trim the video, find the moment that you wish to start at by dragging your finger across the frames at the bottom of the screen. As you move your finger from right to left on the frames, you will see the start time change in the bottom left corner of the video.

If you want to trim the video so that it is less than 15 seconds long, touch the trim slider and drag it from right to left.

Once your video is trimmed to your liking, share it to Instragram or save it to your iPhone’s camera roll.

To share your video, tap the “Share” icon at the top right corner of the screen. You can select your iOS device’s photo and video library, or Instagram to share your video. If you choose Instagram, the video will be rendered in 1:1 ration and saved in your Camera Roll. The app will then redirect you to Instagram so you can upload the video from you iPhone’s photo and video library.

Once it is uploaded to Instagram, you will be able to see the video in its original aspect ratio instead of as a square video.

The Good The Bad Value Conclusion

While I mentioned that $0.99 almost seems too expensive, it really isn’t. It lets you render full ratio videos on Instagram. That is worth the price. If you hate being restricted to square videos on the most popular photo-based social networking site, you will love being able to share landscape and portrait sized videos instead. This app is available for the iPhone 4S and higher and fifth-generation iPod touch and higher. Download it in the App Store today.

Related Apps

Flipagram lets you create mini montage videos on Instagram that are set to music using your photos. Squareready for Video lets you create full ratio videos and includes a couple of additional options.

Does it bother you that Instagram forces you to use 1:1 ratio for photos and videos? Do you use any apps that lets you break free from the square?

Fedora 11 Touts Faster Speed

Red Hat’s community Linux effort, Fedora is out with its latest release, Fedora 11. While Fedora Linux 11 is an optimized release, some might even call it a ‘Spartan’ release, though not for lack of new features. The Fedora 11 release is officially codenamed “Leonidas” who was known as the King of the Spartans.

Fedora 11 includes faster performance and new security, virtualization, desktop and server features. The Fedora release is a preview in some respects of features that the next version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux might contain. It’s also likely the last Fedora release before Microsoft Windows 7 is officially launched later this year.

On the faster side of things, Fedora 11 aims to have a 20 second boot time, which might rival Ubuntu Linux’s 25 second boot time in its recent Jaunty release. Fedora 11 also includes the new Ext4 file system which offers better performance and the ability to handle larger file sizes. New desktop features for device identification and management are also a key part of the Fedora 11 release.

Virtualization also gets a boost in Fedora 11, with new features that enterprise users might be interested in.

“The virtualization features that we have, include an improved console,” Fedora Project Leader Paul Frields told chúng tôi “That means better input support, so when a user is moving from host to guest it’s less of a hassle to try and figure out where your input is being captured.”

Frields added that Fedora 11 also includes something called sVirt which is SELinux (Security Enhanced) containment for virtual guests. SELinux is an access control technology that has its roots in the NSA (National Security Agency) and has been part of Fedora for years. By extending SELinux to virtual guests, Fedora is enhancing the security of its virtualization technologies.

Fedora 11 also includes what Frields described as better authentication for its virtualization manager software (virtmanager).

“That allows you to compartmentalize administrator access for virtualization guests,” Frields said. “That can be important for companies that have SLAs (service level agreements) for their virtual guests.”

Windows developers will also benefit from Fedora 11. Frields explained that the new release includes Window cross compiler support. As such, Fedora 11 developers can create executables for Windows on a Fedora 11 system.

Fedora Community Portal

Alongside the new operating system release, Fedora is showing off its new community portal. The hope is that the new site will help to grow both the Fedora Linux distribution as well as the number of people that contribute.

“It’s all Web-based, so it will cut down on the number of software applications that a contributor will have to learn in order to communicate with the Fedora Project,” Frields said. The Community will be able to connect people live in a way where we can connect people that will encourage more mentorship.”

While Fedora is trying to make it easier for people to participate, its total user base is likely to continue to grow as a result of the Fedora 11 release. Frields estimated that the current total number of Fedora users is approximately 15 million. Fedora counts users based on the number of unique IP addresses that check Fedora repositories for updates.

The total number counted by Fedora includes users of multiple Fedora Linux versions. The Fedora 10 release which came out in November of 2008 has 2.4 million users.

“We expect that download numbers for Fedora 11 will be very strong,” said Frields.

Article courtesy of chúng tôi

Update the detailed information about Ubuntu Vs. Fedora: The Latest Versions Square Off on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!